Forums
-
Discussion
-
- 2
- posts
-
- 45,442
- posts
-
- 194,800
- posts
-
- 122,588
- posts
-
- 57,538
- posts
-
- 21,628
- posts
-
- 11,509
- posts
-
- 39,810
- posts
-
- 5,756
- posts
-
-
Non-Soap Related
-
- 33,008
- posts
-
- 109,682
- posts
-
- 24,591
- posts
-
- 1,687
- posts
-
-
Resource Archive
-
- 32,801
- posts
-
- 133
- posts
-
- 625
- posts
-
- 11,862
- posts
-
- 6,185
- posts
-
- 205,394
- posts
-
- 301,304
- posts
-
- 41,681
- posts
-
-
Soap Opera Network | Archive
-
- 2,100
- posts
-
-
Who's Online 4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 17 Guests (See full list)
-
Forum Statistics
50,036
Total Topics1,413,378
Total Posts
-
Posts
-
By NothinButAttitude · Posted
I just couldn't let it go. Again, I just wish that Beth would've ended by herself and learned it was OK to not be dependent on a man. I agree that JE's Beth was a whole different character. While she was a damsel at times, she still has some fight in her. BC's Beth was just a train wreck and the only reason I cared for her was b/c of BC. -
I didn't mind them that much in GL's last year, as I thought it sort of made sense in closing out the show and focusing on the problems of their children, but Beth was so, so badly damaged in the '90s and '00s that I just had to ignore most of her recent past. Judi Evans just felt like a completely different character. -
By NothinButAttitude · Posted
Beth/Phillip should've never been endgame PERIOD. Especially, after they had Beth birth a child with Alan of all people. Beth was a character that had so much potential, but each passing regime, the writers stayed decimating the character. Honestly, it would've been refreshing to see Beth end alone and be OK with it. Much like Reva, Beth was always defined by the man she was bedding instead of herself. -
-
It sucks that it's cancelled because of bts infighting, not because it is a bad show. *eyeroll*
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
-
Blog Entries
-
-
Blog Statistics
-
Total Blogs183
-
Total Entries7,004
-
