Jump to content

Y&R: December 2016 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

Did you ever get a chance to watch Cassie in 2003? It was GREAT stuff. Cassie in a coma and pissed off Sharon abandoned the family when she woke up, Cassie trying to figure out who Frank exactly was. Cassie going on dates without Sharon's approval or Sharon trying to meet Cassie's boyfriend while Cassie blabbing she was 13/14 years old. The show made it out at Cassie was too immature for the Collen/JT/Daniel/Lily/Kevin/Sierra group but hell she was the future of Newman just as Phillip IV was the future of Chancellor. Oh and killed her off for a failed ratings and Emmy stunt backed up with a failed stunt of a return of Sheila Carter. That's how Y&R screwed us over ever since. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I've noticed him too

Please register in order to view this content

but I have no idea the actor's name

 

I never found Cassie to be annoying like most soap kids. In fact her story with Sharon and Grace at the time in 1998 is what drew me in. Faith's not the worst we've seen but sometimes the attitude they give kids just makes me wish they'd be seen and not heard, it's not that she's not a talented little girl. I was relieved she wasn't the center of attention (or even on) at Summer's party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only thing missing from Friday's episode, sorely missing, was good background music. They started the episode with a trademark Y&R move of having someone arrive in a room and look around for a minute or so, but part of why those used to work was because the cues complimented them so well and built the mood.

 

The episode was strangely lacking music for most of the scenes, except maybe before the cliffhangers to build tension and, of course, Victor and Nikki playing classical music. That worked nicely because classical music is just as dramatic as Y&R's classic scores but then they played a cheerful piece while Victor was crying about all his kids abandoning Newman and it felt very, very off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Killing Cassie off robbed Sharon of an excellent story....which was sharon being overly protective and strict in order to prevent Cassie from getting pregnant as a teen like her....and Cassie could have viewed Sharon's attempts as a subtle way of saying that cassie was a mistake...etc.   #shame

 

I do think Sharon's issues started with the death of Cassie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

That would have been beyond amazing, but Y&R stopped doing character-based drama of course. The situation with Cassie was so rich, it gave them 10 years of excellent drama, and could have given that much more -- so, they killed her.

 

 

It's not even funny how much it does need it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
    • Is nobody going to mention the cringefest that is 'Carl Ivati'?
    • I've accepted we'll probably never see any of the Roger/Holly 1976-1978 storyline. Whenever any of Roger/Holly 1979 and 1980 storylines surface, those are must watch as they set in motion everything we saw a decade later.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy