Jump to content

DAYS OF OUR LIVES Moves to Peacock From NBC on September 12


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 961
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I think they are legitimately trying to shore up Peacock's subscribers, and think it and DAYS might be able to help each other. But I also think they are expecting far too much if they believe an aging, low-budget soap's customer base will pay a premium fee for a non-revamped program in the same poor creative and budgetary condition, on a fledgling streaming service that has very little draw to new customers for other pay content. Y&R or B&B might still be able to help Paramount Plus if they did something new, but Paramount Plus has a considerable product base already (the Star Trek renaissance, etc) and doesn't need it, and Y&R and B&B are in better shape at least budget and numbers-wise.

I don't believe they have any loyalty to DAYS continuing beyond the remaining cycle unless it does the impossible, namely helps boost Peacock considerably. That is an impossible task for DAYS in its current state. So I think they see it as either it helps Peacock somehow, or they burn off its contract and let it go. That's not the same thing as intentionally killing it, but it's essentially the same attitude - if it dies, it dies. A real commitment and investment would've meant more advance notice and a much bigger revamp of the overall show, a la AMC and OLTL. I don't see a real commitment.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The way Ken Corday puts things is off putting, but I don't see a problem with him saying this isn't your mothers Days of Our Lives. ALL of these soaps need to evolve the storytelling. These soaps are most chaste than what we got in the 80s and 90s. Primetime, cable and streaming are giving us cutting age modern stories and these soaps are still giving us this dated mess we've seen time and time again, which is why the show is in the shape it is now. 

The troubling part of his interview is that he said we have to wait until February to see changes. The show is in AWFUL shape right now and has lost some key cast members. This isn't a good time to convince people to switch and PAY to watch the show. They're at a disadvantage because even if they revamp things in February, they're already so far into the season that it may not help in terms of a renewal on Peacock. They're going to have to really promote that time and hope the writers are up to the job. That is what's going to determine the long term future on Peacock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Another colossally stupid, short-sighted, boneheaded decision from NBC/Peacock/Corday Productions. I think all they had to do was digitize one year or 6 months of older episodes, and that would have been enough to rope in a bunch of new subscribers disenchanted with the current show. They need all the subscribers they can get, especially now, to show support for the show when it makes its initial transition. They could have done 1984, the year of the original prisms story, or 1995, the year of the possession. I would have especially signed up for 1984. Such a wasted opportunity; just more to add to the mountain of other wasted opportunities.

It seems like NBC could care less if this succeeds or not; they have not gone out of their way to do anything special or pull out any stops at all..

Edited by Jdee43
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Pretty much. It's like moving a show on its last legs into an impossible time slot - if it succeeds there (which might be a fairly low bar) it's great, if it doesn't... oh well. Is that intentionally killing it? Well, maybe by indifference to it. DAYS was always going to go online at one point, but they aren't exactly nurturing it to make that transition effectively.

If it does get renewed beyond September next year, it'll be in an entirely different format.

 

ETA: one thing that might work in DAYS's favour, besides increased subscriptions, is if they notice that DAYS viewers interact and watch other shows - ie people'll log in daily on Peacock, watch DAYS and then something else, especially since there's still ads on some tiers to my understanding.

Edited by te.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That’s how I read as well. DAYS might be cheaper than a lot of other program types and at least add volume to the Peacock streaming inventory which they can promote. Hours and hours of entertainment options…

however, if the subscriber numbers won’t go up, the daily format or even the entire show is dead by next year.

and making a show, which most people watch out of habit because it is on TV at a certain time, premium for a streaming service site is a wild bet. Maybe those Beyond Salem tryouts worked well enough for Peacock which lacks blockbuster content so far, so that all worries are unnecessary. But I wouldn’t count on it. Switching DAYS to peacock in the free service section for a couple of months before moving it behind the pay-wall would be much smarter, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
    • Under all of Madonna's social media today there is this wave of negative, toxic, absurd comments by Lady Gaga fans telling her how Gaga surpassed her in concert in Copacabana. I mean... Who the hell cares? Why are these fan communities so freaking toxic??? I'm sure Madonna doesn't care... But still. Have some respect for M. Leave her social media alone. Go cheer Gaga and be happy. Why come and spew hate on M??? Crazy world.
    • FYI, again, Ruth/Letitia is not in either of these 2 episodes. So that concludes the 4 episodes I had from Nov. 1983. I don't have the October episodes.
    • Eddie has begun uploading the 1990 episodes. I'm so happy about that. I was mindfully taking a break till there's plenty of episodes I can binge watch when I feel like it. Now that 1989 is complete... I can't wait to press play on February 1989 and resume where I left off.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Me when someone asks me to be proper and demure. 
    • This is just a guess but I feel like the fact that they keep mentioning her dead husband is for a reason. We know Martin has a secret that likely involved someone dying. Martin's victim could be Alan which Leslie/Dana either knows about or finds out and she uses that to blackmail the family into letting her crimes slide.  
    • Just thinking how the Ruth/Leticia guest spot really cemented how Days had changed. Stunt casting with a campy/comedy character in a 'wacky' storyline was something that a few years previously would have been completely out of place on Days (and most other soaps for that matter).
    • I am interested to see how they handle Leslie/Dana down the road. If she continues in this path, it would be unrealistic to have her around. Like other shows have done this with a 'villian' character and ended up with people looking stupid putting up with someone they detest. Another thought-could they be building up to a murder story? Maybe Les/Dan will be left in a coma and we will have a whodunit with several characters as suspect. It would also be a chance to redeem her I wonder how long the show will go w/o resorting to soap cliche stories-twins,switched at birth, murder mystery, long lost child etc
    • Yeah, Martin really did make me laugh when him and Smitty jumped up to drag Leslie out. I am interested in seeing how this fallout will impact his storyline as well. Especially since he is so protective regarding his family/family's image. I am interested in seeing how he will interact with Eva for the time being, they did have a warmer interaction earlier on once they met. But he seems to have doubts about her possibly being Ted's right now. I wonder how long it might take for him to come around with her. I could see the younger generation warming up to her quicker than the older ones. Though of course I think there will be anger/tension for a while regarding the reveal and her role in it. Perhaps Naomi/Chelsea will ease up on Eva first then eventually Martin/Kat might down the line. I really do love Nicole. I'm glad that DD is playing her. She really is the heart of the family and also agree the show. She is so easy to root for and I'm looking forward to seeing how things work out for her. I am enjoying the development of most of the characters on this show. I enjoy most of them including Bill with his trifling self lol. I do feel that Bill's love for his daughters is genuine and that gives him some depth. A few of the characters I don't care for that much (like Bill, Ashley, Vanessa). I wasn't too big on Andre at first, but I am warming up more to him as the actor is settling into the role. I like most of the characters on this show. Also, I am interested in seeing what happens if Eva indeed goes and lives with the new doctor that was introduced. I could see this adding another layer to her story, maybe she will become more vixen-ish, on what type of relationship they end up having. And/or maybe she will end up becoming more hardened as she deals with being an outcast, especially if she falls out with Leslie as well. I think that AM will do a good job of showcasing the different layers of this character as she deals with the fallout of the affair/paternity reveal.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy