Tisy-Lish

Well, don't forget -- Iris was raised in Manhattan (aside from the time she spent in boarding schools in Europe). Mac's family was from Manhattan, and that is where Cory Publishing's original headquarters was located. So if Iris had relocated to Manhattan in 1980 she would not have been new in town -- she would have been returning home. That might have been a good concept for a believable new soap opera. I think it might have been successful if it were a 30-minute soap.

This is why I always enjoyed that little group of have-nots who occasionally gathered for breakfast at Orphie Jean's during the first year of the show. Those folks seemed real and believable. So I was always hoping that group would expand to include a few other have-nots. Maybe the maitre d at the Country Club, maybe Rowena (the Dupree's cook), maybe the personal trainer at the Country Club (forget his name), and June the formerly homeless woman now a server at Orphie Jean's. I think this sort of "chosen family" of working class folks would blend into the fiber of BTG more effectively than introducing an entirely new working class biological family.

I really like Darlene too. And the actress is wonderful, in my opinion. Just wondering -- have Darlene and Elon had any scenes together yet? If so, I must have missed them. It will be interesting to see what kind of dynamic those two have.

If Darlene is the wife of the Chief of Police for Washington DC, then she is not working class. If Elon is Chief for a small municipality, then it's more believable they'd be working class or middle class.

Agreed. How does this list of names mean anything? I think TPTB should have hired a mystery writer as a story consultant for this plasma smuggling plot. A mystery writer could help fill some of the plot holes and make the entire plot a bit less vaguely written. It is not unusual for soap operas to hire story consultants, and often they are even uncredited (although some have been credited). Story consultants do not take-over the writing of a particular plot, they typically make suggestions up-front. And later, they look over scripts before taping to add detail and authenticity. Since they are contracted for a short length of time, they are no threat to any of the show's contract writers. So we have a list of lab employees which includes Grayson's name. Is that supposed to be shocking?

Are they going to be able to pull off a believable debutante cotillion on camera with a soap opera budget? Or will it take place off camera? Will the event be cancelled at the last minute because of some plot point? Any speculation about how the cotillion will be handled?

The unexpected (and probably far too brief) returns of Malcom and Stephanie to Y&R this week have given us, by far, the most interesting and compelling group of episodes in a decade. These episodes have reminded me of the Bill Bell era, when Y&R was so much more than just a show about three billionaire families on a merry-go-round of "who is CEO of which company?". I have actually enjoyed Y&R this week.

Someone mentioned a few weeks ago, that the police station is actually in DC. Do others agree that is true? So is Elon the Chief of Police for Washington DC? If so, the Hawthorn family is certainly not working-class. At the very least, they should be upper middle-class. Of course, Elon and his wife might come from working-class families, and might hold on to some working-class traditions. But if Elon really is Chief of Police for the entire District, the three sons were not raised working-class. And the Hawthorns could probably afford (or almost afford) to live in Fairmont Crest. Of course, there is nothing wrong with this. But I think it has been implied that the Hawthorns are working-class. Perhaps I am wrong about that.

I'd be totally okay with that, as long as it was a good recast. I feel the same way about Malcom.

I'm kinda happy they are beefing-up the Winters family. But problem is -- they are all in the same generation. I think they need to add a couple of Winters elders, even if they must recast. Aunt Mimi could always return, preferably permanently. Or at least Malcom or Olivia permanently (even as recasts). If the entire on-screen Winters family is of the same generation, TPTB are losing a lot of storyline potential. Successful soap opera families are most often multi-generational.

Thank you for responding, your comments are helpful. I wish I remembered more detail, but I don't think I would have imagined this unknown actress. I suppose I could be wrong about the holiday (perhaps it could have been the Christmas Eve episode), but I really think it was Thanksgiving Eve. I could also be wrong about the year, but I seem to remember Janice in the episode, so that should narrow it down. This question has been bugging me for over 30-years. LOL.

Does anyone remember Patricia Bruder being replaced by another actress temporarily around Thanksgiving the same year Janice was on the show? I remember tuning in the episode before Thanksgiving day and the Hughes were preparing the Thanksgiving meal in their kitchen. There was a strange middle-aged blonde woman sitting at the table chatting, but her name was not mentioned in the dialogue. Everyone in the scene was treating her like a well-known friend, so I had to assume she was playing Ellen Stuart. Does anyone else remember this? Or is this episode possibly in someone's collection?

A few months ago, Suzanne was interviewed for about an hour on the Soapy podcast. Although she didn't mention Deidre, she did tell a story about some resentment with other actors. She shared that when she was diagnosed with myasthenia gravis in the mid-1980s, her appearance changed and two or three of the other actors made derogatory remarks about it. Suzanne said she was very hurt by this. She also admitted she still harbors a grudge about it, and she doubts forgiveness is in the future. Could this be the cause of the current issue between Suzanne and Deidre? I'm sure Suzanne's interview is still available, if anyone is interested in listening.

I agree. The facial structure doesn't resemble Mia's, although the hair (from Peyton Place) is similar. I personally do not think this is a photo of Mia Farrow. But that's just my opinion.

Well, that's a close shot. But this set is much bigger (to the left and to the right) than what we see here. I'm not interested in arguing about it, so believe what you want to believe.