Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

It’s always a present when “new” footage is rediscovered. Thank you for posting this! But I’m curious about who’s wedding they’re talking about in the first clip? Bill and Missy’s? I thought it was Walter and Lenore’s at first as well, but then I looked it up and Lefty Burns was already dead by the time they were married  

Edited by AbcNbc247
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Interesting, because most people forget Marland had script writers who penned the dialogue for him on ATWT.  Lemay at AW in the 1970s had a much smaller staff, and usually rewrote the dialogue his script writers had written.

I did love Marland for his wonderful plots.  They always had a beginning, middle, and end.  And they seemed organic to the characters, even though they were often extremely strong and traditional soap opera plots.   Marland obviously loved and embraced the soap opera genre. Conversely, Lemay rejected and disliked the genre he was writing for.   

I believe Lemay said he didn't like writing murder trials and medical stories.   He did write a few murders on AW, but none of them were traditional murder mysteries.  And only two had trials -- John Randolph (for killing Even Webster) and Pat Randolph (for killing Greg Barnard).  Bernice Robinson and Rocky Olsen were also murdered, and there may have been a couple of other murders I have forgotten.  But only two trials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think early exposure to Lemay gave me the mindset to enjoy the types of movie and TV that a lot of people criticize for plotlessness. "Nothing happened!" Me: "What do you mean, character X had an epiphany!" Looking back, it's pretty incredible that AW was so popular in that format, especially when you consider where we are today, when soap viewers bash anything that doesn't advance the plot. 

Loved seeing that old clip. I just have very vague impressions of Sam and Lahoma, but I know I was thrilled to see Lana Wedgeworth show up on Three's Company because I had such good feelings about her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Great scenes.  But this is rather confusing.  There are two different weddings in these segments.  During the apartment scenes, they are discussing Bill and Missy's wedding.  And the cut-in dancing segments take place in Jim and Mary Matthews' livingroom.  The later wedding in the large church is that of Lenore and Walter.  And the later dancing segments are from Walter and Lenore's wedding reception.   All of this was likely written by Agnes Nixon who created Ada, Rachel, Sam, and Lahoma and added the show's first working-class family to AW around 1967.   

Edited by Neil Johnson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, I believe the closest thing to business stories Lemay wrote at AW were when Tim McGowan embezzled most of Steve's money from Frame Enterprises while Steve was in prison; and later when Ray Gordon insisted Alice make him president of Frame Enterprises and then promptly bankrupted the company.   Those were believable plots, I suppose.  But not really what I would call business intrigue stories.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Apparently, though, he WAS very good at writing that story about Iris bugging Eliot's hotel room -- the one that got written up in the NY Times or Washington Post as being so similar to the then-ongoing Watergate scandal.  So, it seems like Lemay COULD write good, suspenseful plots when he wanted to, but that's when he WANTED to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lemay was actually very good at writing things he didn't want to write, and didn't actually like himself.  So he should have forced himself to write stronger plots more often.  The Sven storyline (probably Lemay's strongest plot on AW) brought AW to number one in the ratings, and had the audience mesmerized.  Yet, he disliked that storyline immensely and said he was embarrassed he had written it.   There were also several characters he disliked, yet wrote wonderful situations and dialogue for them.  I've always felt Lemay was stubborn and didn't want to write anything he "didn't want to write."  LOL.  But he should have had more self discipline and realized he had the talent to be a far more diversified writer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I often wonder if we make too much of Lemay's memoir?  It was written after he quit his longest and most successful job, but before he had many other experiences both in and out of the soap field. 

I recently looked back at the emails I sent after the one and only time that I ever quit a job in my entire career, and I don't feel the same way now that I did then, and I am able to find humor in things that used to infuriate me.

In my memory he wrote some of the great mystery stories, because the repercussions were widely felt throughout various characters.  His work on Friends and Lovers was mostly centered on young love.  And, I've always appreciated the nuance he brought to characters.  For example, Mac could have been just an older gentleman oblivious to the motives of his wife and daughter, (like many older rich guys on soaps), but he was bit a playboy (who could forget the bracelets that he gave to more than one woman), with an ego, and was therefore more complex than most.  We saw how Iris became more "one note" when written by other head writers and I think it is a perfect example of Lemay's artistry.

For whatever reason, I get defensive of Lemay's work because it was such a highlight of my AW fandom, and I loved the book.  But, it obviously only tells one side of the tale, and the opinions offered may not have stuck with him in his later years.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I found myself violently nodding in agreement while reading your comment. You are absolutely right (and should be applied to many comments many people made over the years) but probably even more so when you also remember the guy was also a writer.
On top of your point about strong feelings that may have faded with time or perspective he may have gained later, most writers *write* everything. They are creators not just putting simple thoughts on paper; they are "writing", molding, shaping, influencing, tweaking to create a story, elicit feelings, be compelling.
Even an ostensibly non-fiction autobiography will have been shaped by the desire to create narratives, drama, feelings in the audience.
It may not have been intentional but even as he wrote it, it may not have been the full picture of his feelings or thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always said that.  When I think about my two favorite soaps.  AW & GH.  I watched GH for the intrigue, storylines and mystery.  I watched AW for the characters.  Not that GH didn't have some great characters but it was a very plot driven show where AW was just about characters and their emotions.  When you really think about it, AW was a yawn fest and it remained that way even after Lemay.  There were a few years where they did try the GH type writing and storylines but they were terrible & began to work better again in the late 80's when the show  focused on the families again.  Frames, Corys & Matthews.  Probably by this point most viewers were not that interested in on character intrigue but more about the storylines and AW never regained success again but it does make you wonder how it was so successful in the 70's when there were no real plot driven stories.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you so much for this clip.  I would rush home from school and turn this on and discuss with classmates the next day (which was probably too intense for 5th grade)

 

Loved the Lee Randolph story.  Never will get the scene out of my mind when Lefty Burns made and gave Lee LSD

 

Barbara Rodell was a great actress.  She played mousey roles until she landed psychotic Joyce Coleman on As the World Turns

 

I saw in an interview once where Ann Wedgeworth did not have fond memories of her time on soaps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • So Doug just leaves Vanessa there with Joey? He's a f*cking loser. Vanessa needs to divorce his arse 
    • Tina Sloan tied Jerry VerDorn record when Guiding Light was cancelled - 26 years uninterrupted 
    • Very true...but TPTB all were desperate to get into prime time or films and couldn't, so they looked down on their own industry and tried to infuse themes that just didn't work in soaps. I would have thought after 9/11 the shows would have gone out of their way to provide that warmth and comfort that the audience wanted, and to bring old viewers back. Budget cuts? Just bring back kitchen sets, both ATWT and GL got rid of those besides one each..(the Snyders and the Bauers) You don't need super fancy sets if you have the writing. 
    • LMAO they didn't 

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • LY has a job on another show. She's going to be on the Legally Blonde prequel "Elle" 
    • From what I can put together, the 1980s had several actors with interrupted runs. Michael Zaslow: 1971-1980, 1989-1997 Maureen Garrett: 1976-1980, 1988-?, ?-end Christopher Bernau: 1977-1984, 1986-1988 Peter Simon: 1981-1984, 1986-1996, ?-end Maeve Kinkead: 1981-1987, 1989-1996, 1997-end Robert Newman: 1981-1984, 1986-1991, 1993-end Jordan Clarke: 1983-1987, 1989-1993, 1996, 1997-end By 1989, I believe the longest-tenured cast member without a departure was Jerry verDorn.
    • I know they were popular, but once they tamed Van's shrew, I thought Billy just brought Van down. Since they had just Nola and Billy sitting around in 97, an interesting thing would be if they had developed a friendship that turned into something else while Van was "dead". Maybe Billy lives at the Boardinghouse (to work on repaing his relationship with Bill) and works at Company instead of the stupid diner. Nola and Bridget give him a job there and Nola and Billy (who had originally been a bit antagonistic) slowly build up a relationship and then Van returns. A returned new lease on life Van would return to her "high hat ways" and take on the Spaulding's for control of the company with Billy helping her behind the scenes.  I know that Jordan was on sporadically because of his issues and them not know if they could trust him not to fall of the wagon, but they could have done it slow..and give Van and Nola a new reason to get in each others hair (I love a good Van/Nola tussle.)
    • Congratulations to Coco Gauff on her second win in one of the GS tournaments, the French Open.

      Please register in order to view this content

          Perhaps it wasn't the most well-played match in history, but that's something no one will remember in a few years time.
    • The thing with Martin (for me) is that he should have been Anita and Vernon's kid. I honestly think he would have been fine being an older or younger brother to Dani and Nicole. It also would have made his relationship and kids feel more realistic. A handsome salt and pepper late 40s/early 50s congressman who settled down and adopted kids to fit an image for politics. Not that he didn't want this lifestyle but it is what he needed to do to get ahead. Also, we don't often get older characters playing LGBT roles not just on daytime but across most media. It would have been a refreshing take. As an alternative, Sam and Ty could have been Martin's kids from an earlier marriage a la the NJ governor that was outed. We could have also seen parallels between Vernon and Anita thinking back to how they handled Martin coming out compared to the way they accepted Chelsea.  As for Martin being Nicole and Ted's kid, I do wish in this case he was not tied to a marriage and kids, so that he could date and sleep around like any other character on a soap.  Yeah, I didn't get it...but what I did get is that girl is a bit crazy like her mama.  Vanessa and Joey talking about the poker table...get these people off my screen. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Unpopular opinion, but I didn't think the show should have reunited Billy/Vanessa at all until the final stretch of the show. When watching the 1989 episodes when both Vanessa and Billy return after being off the show... I liked that Vanessa had moved on from him and that the show was hinting at her wanting to reunite with her first love Ross while looking down at Nadine for being the one Ross was dating.  And I loved the twist where Billy and Nadine teamed up to keep Vanessa/Ross apart.   This was an interesting concept that sadly the writers dropped with the show deciding to make Vanessa pine over Billy between 1990 and 1993 when they finally reunited.   To me, Vanessa pining over Billy seemed out of character. At least once Billy was carted off to prison in 1994... she and Billy divorced and stayed divorced until the final months when they finally found their way back together.  During the years when they were divorced, I liked that they had maintained a friendship and connection.. with viewers (like my late mom) wondering if they would ever decide to make it work again. I wish the show had tried that with Josh/Reva because by the time of the final episode when they rode off into the sunset, I didn't care because we'd been through the make up and break ups between them for over 10+ years by that point.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy