Jump to content

Y&R: Old Articles


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 14.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Thinking back to the character of Dr Joshua Landers, one time hubby to Nikki.

In casting and writing that role, they seemed to go with the blandest actor and character possible.

There was not much chemistry between Josh and Nikki and not much storyline, except for the crazy wife.

Josh wasn't given any backstory or relatives. He was just there to be Nikki's husband and as source of conflict with Victor. Did Jack have much to do with Nikki and Josh?

They didn't delve into Joshua's psyche and explore his attraction to her or his feelings about Victor.

Why was Nikki attracted to Joshua? Did she deliberately choose someone the antithesis of Victor?

Imagine if Joshua was a stronger character who went up against Victor or insisted Nikki have nothing to do with him. Maybe his medical background be brought in-a patient accuses him of inappropriate behaviour and Victor funds her legal action.

There should have been years of story for this marriage.

But it seems Joshua was a plot device and they didn't want an actor or character that might successfully overshadow Jack or especially Victor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In retrospect, Joshua and Veronica Landers do seem less like fully fleshed-out characters and more like means to an end (the end, of course, being Nikki's brush with death and reunion with Victor).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dr. Josh was Nikki's rebound from Victor disappointing her (remember Nikki thought she and Victor were about to reunite, then Victor went to Kansas to be with Hope and Adam in the aftermath of Cliff's death). Also a plot device to keep Nikki and Victor apart.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nikki marrying Josh was pretty random, especially since it happened not long after Nikki’s ill-fated marriage to Brad and as @kalbir mentioned it occurred at a point where Victor and Nikki were to reconcile before Victor left to look after Hope in the wake of Cliff’s death. 
 

I don’t recall there being much animosity between Victor and Josh at all other than Josh occasionally annoyed that Victor could show up at the ranch anytime and Victor questioning Josh about Veronica and giving Josh the usual “Don’t hurt her” warning. Josh had been the doctor to save baby Noah so I think there was mutual respect. 
 

Heath Kizzier was a part of a trio of bland leading men hired for prominent new characters in 1996 along with Leigh McCloskey (who was very boring in Dallas) and Granville Van Dusen. I’m not sure what was going on with the casting department at the time but they made some odd choices. I know the writing wasn’t the strongest at the time but none the three showed any charisma nor were dynamic at all to make any lasting impressions. 
 

I mean was anyone at all interested in the Ashley/Kurt/Hope triangle? I did feel bad for Hope who’s exit was her furious that Victor had married Diane.

Jack and Nikki had zero reason to interact at by 1997 so I don’t think Josh and Jack had much interaction aside from being acquainted with each other. I recall Jack and Jill were teased in the fall of 97 when things weren’t going too smooth with Keith anymore for Jill. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@soapfan770 1996 was just a mess overall. There was Nick and Sharon eating the show up until the spring, then the lull started in the fall which carried through the first half of 1997. In between was Who Shot Victor and in all honesty that was the only storyline worth watching that year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL so true @kalbir. Now I do remember enjoying the Olivia vs. Nathan drama and Nate’s kidnapping at the time as well although it retrospect was a pretty irresponsible way for Nathan’s character to end. Still both Rowell and especially TLW should have won the Emmy. 
 

1996 was an off year for all the CBS soaps. Y&R was wildly uneven, B&B was a mess (Brooke and the dolls?), ATWT imploded in a blaze like of glory, and GL’s storylines inspired righteous indignation. Thankfully at least 3 of the 4 fared much much better in 1997. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • We get it, you don't like this show or the actors. You've said that over and over again, Mr. Vanguard America/VDARE.
    • Lol at the WSB hot guy asking Joss if she was okay with betraying her friends.  Of course she is! Chase coming in hot at Dante was a choice. It's also quite hypocritical since Chase is lying to him about Dante's own child and making Lulu the bad guy.  Talk to the grown woman yourself Chase.  Don't make Dante do it. Lulu and Laura had some great scenes. The Rocco/Danny party is obvious an anvil for something happening and probably the Gio secret coming out. The Willow/Drew/Nina scenes were kind of anti-climatic?  I get why Nina chose this path as the way to get rid of Drew, but will anyone ever find out Drew was sleeping with Nina?  
    • I was reading the NYT article on Roku's purchase of FrndlyTV. As anyone who has read my posting knows, I think re-airing old soaps is an imprudent idea. However, I will admit that if large media companies are looking for more streaming content.  And, if advances in AI continue to make the digitization process faster and cheaper.  Those of you who want the owners of the IP to release anything in their vaults may have reason to be hopeful.  Because the makers of TV's want to get into streaming in order to encourage young people to get back in the habit of updating their TV devices every few years.  And, Roku's plan is market exclusive content, that you have to buy a Roku device to view.  And you-know-who has a ton of content to sell.
    • This was  the messiest hour of television I’ve seen since Kenya Moore asked “who is this hoe?”
    • details of the current Health Secretary RFK Jr's insane beliefs - Doesn't believe that germs cause illness; suggests HIV doesn't cause AIDS; suggests antidepressants are behind mass shootings; believes that vaccines are harmful; suggests chemicals in water are changing children's gender identities... and is quick to promote supplements to prevent and treat diseases, such as recently recommending vitamin A for measles and falsely claiming children who die from the viral infection are malnourished. https://arstechnica.com/health/2025/04/rfk-jr-s-anti-vaccine-stance-is-rooted-in-a-disbelief-in-germ-theory/
    • Please register in order to view this content

      I missed the reference at the time, but those DAYS writers really like jokey character names.
    • Unfortunately they are not using this goddess to her potential.
    • Tamara Tunie is a goddess in my opinion.  She can totally bring the mesmerizing acting, when Anita is written for in an active way.  Anita is less interesting when written as a talk-to or a reciter of past events.  I think she'll be more in an active role at some point in the relatively near future? Pretty sure Daphnée is going to bring it soon!
    • At this point I think the core four are highly overrated. And Tamara Tunie's place on this show is an unexpected disappointment.
    • Have to say it, Michael Dietz looked stunningly handsome. The silver fox look suits him perfectly. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy