Jump to content

General Hospital: March 2023 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 334
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I wonder who made the decision that this group represents the show. Very weird.

I'm sure Jordan and Curtis are there as representation but Portia and Trina are far more popular than her.

Unfortunately, no. He's slowly evolving into Woody from Toy Story.

I can't even comment on Cam forgiving Joss it makes me so mad. Why can't ANYONE stay upset with Carly or her daughter? Only "bad" people get to call them on their BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I honestly think Maxie/KS gets pretty good treatment as far as inclusion in press and whatnot.  Her stories however....

Brooklyn does get story too, but very little press.

The show hasn't care about Kristina since about 2010 and has never cared about Molly, which I have never understood.  They are both capable actresses and gorgeous women that have legacy parents, but let's just focus on Willow and Sasha instead lol.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Once again soap justice is bizarre.

Today we learned that Trina can free Esme just by going to Robert (an Australian spy, and not a US citizen, who was once suspected of treason, but somehow became a police captain, and was then elevated to DA, despite never going to law school)  and asking him to drop the charges.

A patient with a brain injury being remanded to a mental hospital, and not a rehabilitation center, is already nonsense.  But, now they write it like people who were found to be insane can be set free by the DA, and not a judge; even though they were never tried or convicted of a crime.  It is as if the writing staff at GH doesn't have access to Google.

And, let's not even mention how anyone in Port Charles can just drop into this institution for the criminally insane on a whim to visit the patients. 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

3-8

 

Cameron's leaving??? Hold up now!!!

 

And I know I've said this before, and I'll say it again...I sooo like that Liz has not upped and vanished since it appears the story with her parents dried up. First with all the Nik shenanigans. And that is still going on. Then her with Ava/Austin. Not to mention Scotty as her lawyer and the Orbecht slap. And now Victor is crossing her path. And while mostly the same story, I like that RH gets to mix it up with so many people. And now...this Cameron talk. I know, I know...I'm such a Liz fan.

 

And I see the writers are continuing to bond Laura and Esme. As expected. Great use of history with Laura's own past, leaving Nik on Cassandine Island. It honestly makes me wonder if Esme will ever get her memory back...and even more...do I want her to? 

 

I am not liking that Portia/Curtis/Trina have gone back to the land of C level storytelling after a February where Portia was running the girls!!!

Please register in order to view this content

 Way to kill the momentum. And they revealed that Marshall might have been misdiagnosed? For what purpose? It was nice to see Sprina though and I will keep on swooning...though I admit NC is less attractive to me with the haircut. lol.

 

I am happy that the Victor storyline is moving again. Well, the Victor vs Anna part of it. And Victor vs Laura a little bit. But I don't think it was a good idea to tell the Deputy Mayor so much. Victor will see right through her. Moreso now that it's been revealed she was sleeping with Victor, too. smh. And now we are seeing the writers connect Luke's death, Jennifer Smith/Ice Princess, and Cody/Britt/the Necklace together to what Victor's agenda is. Now if they tie Jake and the Peter brainwashing into this and this place Victor is looking for...it might be worth it. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation.
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy