Jump to content

DAYS OF OUR LIVES Moves to Peacock From NBC on September 12


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I don't know. It all just seems a bit rushed which is often never a good sign.

The announcement should have read that 2022/23 would be Days final season on NBC before moving to its new home on Peacock. This would have given writers more time to wrap up stories on Network TV while being able to create a fresh start for the soap on Peacock that would allow for casual viewers or unaware streamers to pick up or dive in to the show. It would also allow for promotion of the switch over an extended period of time to allow viewers to make the switch more seamlessly. 

The only benefit I see with this transition is that there will be no pause in new episodes, which for retention, I believe is a good sign. Viewers won't have to wait months or a year for new episodes. However, everything about this sudden move, from the fact it has seemed to come out of nowhere down to episodes just being the same old stuff that's already being produced for NBC, screams like a last ditch effort by Days but also Peacock. No offense but Days is not going to save Peacock and if Peacock is this desperate than it's not a great sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 961
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Very rushed.  I think what will happen is that the shows that have already been taped by DAYS will go to Peacock. Supposedly they are doing January 2023 then the rest of the shows will be taped for the rest of the season to run through Sept. 2023 as per the contract. Then in Sept. 2023 DAYS will be cancelled or reformatted into a 3 episode week for streaming. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're right...anything is possible. There's nothing in the announcement that says Days will continue with its original format of 5 hour long episodes per week. I can see Peacock doing more of these 5 episode specials like Beyond Salem or maybe producing something more similar to a telenovela with 80-150 episodes per year "book" style and release all the episodes at once on a yearly basis. Netflix has heavily invested in telenovelas lately and they've found great success.

Edited by GLATWT88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Whether Days is on Peacock after Sept. 2023 when the current contract runs out remains to be seen. Honestly, I do not see Days surviving past Sept. 2023. Moving it to Peacock was because of the contract.  The ratings will not be significantly higher on Peacock especially since Days will be in Peacock Premium.  I do not think Comcast/Universal is going to turn DAYS into a telenovela. NBC should have just cancelled Days and let it finish up on NBC through Sept. 23. It is all about money. Making it and saving all the costs.

Edited by JoeCool
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. My initial and gut feeling is that this is a way to get rid of Days.

I also didn't mean that they would turn Days into a telenovela in a traditional sense, but some telenovelas nowadays have multiple seasons or series. So instead of Days producing 200+ daily episodes. Stories can be condensed to a telenovela of 120+ episodes that are released all at once to viewers each year. Stories can have a set course and some can wrap by the end of the season - taking viewers through a story beginning to end, while other stories can be left to pick up on the next season. It would reduce the number of episodes produced, but also create content that is more accessible to the modern viewer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, pretty much. Even if it does survive beyond September 2023 (big if, yes), there's really no sense in producing 200+ 40 minute episodes per year. Add that even if they continue to produce episodes for somewhat regular consumption for several times per week, I don't think they need to be more than ~21 minutes; the reason why they expanded soaps in the first place was because it was more cost effective to fill airtime, but creatively, soaps do better with a shorter format imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Count me among the skeptics doubting that Peacock will feature the entire DOOL library. It’s hard to see Sony or NBC going to expense of digitizing all those old episodes. I read elsewhere that Peacock will feature the the last five years of episodes. That sounds more realistic since they’re already in digital format. And then they could put up a few special episodes from before that era to pacify fans: the first episode, Doug and Julie’s wedding, Bo and Hope’s wedding, Marlena seemingly getting killed by the Salem Strangler, etc.

I also think that if the show is renewed past the 2022-23 season, it will be for these little five episode limited series a la Beyond Salem. Maybe once a month or even just once per quarter. No way will they show five episodes per week. Broadcast soaps were designed for viewers who tuned in 2-3 times per week. That’s why there’s so much repetition. With streaming, viewers can catch every episode if they want, so they simply won’t need as much content.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know this is not ideal and many people are upset.  But the talk that this is being done as a way to just get rid of DAYS altogether is not realistic.  If they wanted the show gone they could very easily have announced the show is done when this contract is up.

They are attempting to draw viewers to Peacock, with something they think is a big enough asset to do it.  They want the show to help them succeed.  The question is will viewers tune in?

And moving them to less than 5 days a week would honestly be for the best.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Currently, the confines of network programming demand that soaps build to an exciting moment before every commercial, at the end of every episode, with special considerations for Friday and sweeps.  Streaming is obviously free of those constraints.  So, I wonder how that will effect pacing and storytelling?

So, many of elements of what defines a soap were developed in order to sell household products that I don't know what a serialized story with no ending would look like on a streaming platform where everyone consumes it differently?

Imagine a twenty year old college student in 2025 with a free afternoon and their parent's Peacock password in college.  Where would they start watching?  How would they know the characters?  It doesn't feel like something you would choose to jump into; especially 60 years into the story...

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Valid concerns, none of which I expect will be addressed. I think is just a case of dumping clearance merchandise into a outlet store. (Although I'm now imagining the ghost of Gloria Monty making a valiant effort to tailor DOOL into a show that follows modern streaming conventions.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now that is an excellent analogy. The cynic in me says that this is a best of all worlds for NBC: do a ‘soft cancellation’ of DAYS off network, burn off the last year’s worth of episodes while potentially luring viewers to Peacock, and all while giving a public pitch that they’re moving DAYS forward into streaming. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Days intends to survive on Peacock. TPTB best step it up. In its current incarnation it's horrible. Ron needs to go. Days also needs to be aesthetically modernized. A budget of loose spare change on a streaming service is just beyond pitiable. I see people on social media happy over the move. But what's the point. If the show is still horrible. The divisiveness i see on twitter and Days fb groups from the fanbase. Is far more entertaining than the soap itself.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy