Jump to content

Y&R December 2019 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It's too bad that we probably weren't posting in the thread at the same times @koos, so we likely missed each other's posts.  @KMan101I do agree that it's been a problem for a long time.

 

The case of that video posted upthread is kind of unusual since it involves veteran actors, usually you see that type of debacle with 'greener' actors.  When the actors are relatively inexperienced, particularly in daytime, I tend to think that the absence of a director gets compounded with the nature of how soaps are produced these days, as @BetterForgotten mentioned. I can remember reading interviews with actors who started on soaps in the 80s, 90s up until the very early '00s saying that they often found a lot of helpful advise and guidance from the veteran actors on their respective shows.  I think the way storylines are constructed and shooting schedules are done, it's less likely that you'll have a very new actor interacting with an Eric Braeden or a Jess Walton.  I know a lot of people laugh when one of Eric Braeden's followers tweet at him about a new cast member and his response is usually "Who?!!" but, in most cases, I genuinely think he's being honest, he doesn't know who that person even is because they haven't interacted at all because they're rarely even on set the same days, and that's fine but I feel like the element of younger actors interacting and gaining insight from the more experienced veterans is lacking these days.  I think, back in the day, even when actors didn't share scenes, they'd have opportunities to interact from just being on the set some of the same days.

But yeah, it's a confluence of factors why we end up seeing scenes as wildly uneven as the one upthread. Although, again, it used to be rare to see it play out with veteran actors.  I guess times truly have changed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Directors on soaps have always been constrained by time limits, but nowadays it seems they just give basic outlines and leave it to the actors.

 

It used to be morning read through off set, then blocking on set, dress rehearsal and then taping (sometimes retakes if necessary)

 

How does it work these days?

 

I know they don't retake any more, unless absolutely necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The ONLY things going for that scene were the snowflakes in the windows and the music. 

 

The way it played out, Phyllis didn't look as though she were even trying to DECIDE whether or not to tell Nick her news.   It looked as though she just walked in to confide in the hostess --- her best friend and confidante -- that she had some information about Nick's brother, but she'd determined in advance to "take the high road", and she was just letting her dear friend, the hostess, know what was going on.   How stupid.  

 

Would've been ten times better if she'd given it some thought, taken a step toward him, changed her mind, then said, "Naw, I'm taking the high road" and left.  It's really hard to watch scene after scene fall flat on its face like this.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, that Phyllis scene was horrible with the waitress. I miss Gina Tognoni, and will admit the writing is doing MS no favours either.

 

On a superficial note, Kyle looked REALLY good in that brown cardigan.

 

They really don't know what to do with Nick. 

 

Have no idea what's going on with Billy, but it sucks.

 

Nate is acting like a whole bitch to Devon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't like the way that Devon/Elena keep trying to pry into Amanda's life and how they keep clashing with Nate over that. Amanda really hasn't been bothering them, and doesn't seem concerned about them. Yet they continue to worry about her life and act upset regarding things like her relationship with Nate. I agree with Nate that they shouldn't be prying into her personal life. And both Devon/Elena have been coming across as nags. I could see their snooping leading to trouble coming to town in the form of her ex Ripley. 

 

IMO, this story is falling flat, because Devon wasn't that bothered when Amanda first showed up and seemed more concerned about the will than anything. But now that Colin has taken off wants to turn his attention to Amanda. Elena is coming across as very insecure and Amanda/Nate haven't even been interacting the past several days. I look forward to any upcoming interaction they will have. I think that Nate/Amanda continue to have good chemistry, unlike Amanda/Billy who I really don't see chemistry with. (Though, I'm fine with an Amanda/Billy friendship.) I do think that Jason Thompson is trying to generate something with them, but there really isn't anything there, IMO.

 

And the show still isn't doing much with the young set. Even Lola, who the show is now acting like Theo might be interested in. The Young set hasn't had much of a story in several weeks now. They really aren't doing much of anything. 

 

 

 

 

He and Elena have wondered if Nate has feelings for Amanda. But Nate hasn't really admitted anything to them. Nate continues to be friends with Amanda, though they haven't been shown together in several days. She's been spending more time getting to know/bonding with Billy. I do think that Nate definitely has feelings for her and I wonder how he will react once he finds out that she's been spending more time with Billy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yup.  IDC how many years Joshua Morrow has been with the show.  Nick Newman is a dead-end character, because Morrow remains VERY limited in his acting abilities.  About the only thing he's good for, IMO, is another, permanent reunion with Sharon -- and we know how he feels about that, lol!

 

Frankly, if it were up to yours truly, I'd just as soon kill off the bastard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe they should recast Noah, and possibly have some kind of father/son battle or secret lovers thing?  Or have Faith decide she wants to stay in GC and falls in love with a boy from the wrong side of the track kind of deal.  His stories should be around his older kids, because I love his interactions with Summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

re Nick

The politics story screeched to a halt and before that Dark Horse led to nothing (apart from money wasted on the set).

Nick is the easy going family minded guy (a reflection of JM it seems) so business stories don't seem to work - he's best at being a dad. 

Is there something in Nick's past that could be used to provide story? Grace's return?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Josh Griffith starts stories, characters have interesting conversations, those conversations become repetitive....and then nothing happens. The stories go NOWHERE. I cannot believe that a HW believes this stuff is compelling television.

 

Every week, we get a start to ANOTHER storyline. Unbelievable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

True.  @Cruising Soaps also has the right idea with involving Nick in his kids' lives more.  IMO, that is the only way to make JM work.

 

It's just a shame that neither he nor Amelia Heinle really has what it takes to work in business stories.  Nick and/or Victoria should be involved heavily in Newman Enterprises stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel like Nick is easier to write than Victoria (due to a limited actress in the role). I feel like Nick works best *not* working at Newman and as a rich boy at home cheating on his wife, getting into trouble and interfering with his kids lives. He always reminded me of Nikki and just like she didn't need to work I don't think he does. I prefer Nick with Sharon because it allows him to explore the type of stories he should have which is more as a father/romantic cad. Victoria is the one I wish was a strong and powerful business woman. By now she should be a force to be reckoned with. Someone that people are intimidated by and who gives as good as she gets in romantic relationships. A female Victor essentially. Nick just doesn't work as a business man (he is too dumb) and Victoria doesn't work as a romantic heroine or housewife (too cold). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agree that AH comes across as cold. Sally seemed to be exploring that in her early frosty relationship with Reed.

They should continue in that direction .Heather Tom had that steeliness also.Let Victoria become a total beech due to all the garbage she's gone through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
    • Was Blake the product of Roger raping Holly, or did that come after when they were a couple?
    • I really wish we could see that episode...absolutely, my memory could be faulty, it was a very long time ago. I'm not going to contradict what the actors said--there has to be a reason it made them so uncomfortable that they talked about it in the press and complained to TPTB. I think that was the first one where they made the point that they wanted to educate the audience about the subject.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy