Jump to content

Y&R: New Head Writer


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

In fairness, both GH and Y&R are terrible for entirely different reasons. I don't have to like one if I critique the other - JFP is a legendary hack who helped destroy GH and many other soaps, and her work at Y&R is unwatchable.

  • Replies 583
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

You can absolutely slam whichever one you choose. One is worse than the other and you expect better. I could certainly see why you'd be harder on YR. You expect better. With FrankenRon, this is their better. However, my point was to a select few [and I don't wish to rehash].

  • Members
Posted

What does Cartini have to do with the fact that Y&R is on their third writing team within the past year? Y&R's ills go beyond the RC, and the soap press and was going on before RC was even at GH.

Can any fan of Pratt's work at AMC, GH, and his various primetime shows tell me what he can do for Y&R that he did for shows?

  • Members
Posted

The first few weeks of Pratt's run will be vibrant and amazing. I'll tune in for the beginning.

Hey, I appreciate Y&R, once loved it, and understand its place in history, but the damage LML and MAB did to the show has already been too profound. There's really nothing more to do than enjoy the small pleasures in a bleak situation.

  • Members
Posted

In the poor guy's defense, he wasn't hired to bring AMC back to its homespun family/community roots and he's certainly not being hired at Y&R to return the show to the Bill Bell glory days. A Chuck Pratt is hired to raise sagging demos with big plot-driven events and lightening fast stories, to hell with character and logic. That's his forte. That's the thing he "seemingly" does best. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. His style just didn't work at AMC, which was in such sad shape when he took over anyway, nothing could've saved it. McTavish and especially Frons did so much irreversible damage. However, it could work at Y&R. No, it probably won't be a product that would do Bill Bell proud, but if he features the vets in fast-moving stories with some momentum, it could be successful.

  • Members
Posted

Vets is a key word and I just don't see it. Not since GL has Phelps had so many older characters and actors onscreen this often. An entire plot revolved around Nikki and Paul. Ashley was lured back with the promise of story. Tracy has dropped in a couple of times. Lauren spent most of JFP's first months on the front burner, including singing a contract with the show again for the first time since the 1990's. Cricket has been on the show, Jill came back from exile, and Tristan Rogers also signed a contract. All these moves seem so unlike her, and unlike what Pratt does, so expect changes quickly.

I can't think of a single actor over 50 during her GH tenure besides Tony Geary that was on contract by the time she left. Lots of people blame Frons, and that is entirely possible. But she doesn't have the best track record, and it will be interesting to see where she and Pratt have taken the show in 6 months.

  • Members
Posted

CBS is a different playing field than ABC or NBC. Jill and others know CBS skews quite old, which is why Y&R hasn't had the same youth domination or deterioration of veteran cast as some of the other shows have.

They may not write for them properly, but Y&R seems to hold on to its veterans a lot better than some other shows.

  • Members
Posted

I think the show still could have been saved. I don't even think he fatally damaged it (PP AMC was more than decent), although he did his best. But I don't think most of his material worked even as shock value melodrama. The Kendall heart story was atrocious on every level, and the Reese-turns-straight story was somehow both incredibly offensive and incredibly boring. I can't remember one good thing he did other than showing Opal a little more often, and he did try to write for the Hubbards, even if he destroyed Jessie's character in the process.

  • Members
Posted

You don't think somebody like JFP is hired to revamp to improve demos? She absolutely is, no matter what network. If she brings down costs by eliminating some hefty contracts, CBS and Sony won't be upset. She won't be removed until the damage has been done. Nobody running these shows at the network level thinks we have 20 years left. They want better ratings and demos in the short term. Of course Pratt sounds exciting to the brass, his writing can be exciting. But it's kind of like being the Michael Bay of daytime. He's all flash, and no substance, but with less budget.

  • Members
Posted

Again not really, Chuck was able to raise some ratings due to his event based story-telling (i.e. the Tornado) but people grew exhausted of him quite quickly, within 7-8 months of head writing for AMC it was hitting all time lows in all ratings and demos and was at a race to the bottom along side ATWT for the least watched soap on television. What Headwriter do you know kills a show so quickly, that not even a year into his tenure he is driving viewers away from the show? By the time his first year ended the show was an utter wreck. I remember the Fall season of 2009: happy good times with Nu!Liza, Crazy!Golddigger!Annie, Kendell shot Stuart, and Randi the beloved Prostitute of the Night.

He was only in the position for a year and a few months, before they showed him the door and Lorraine was given full reign to put the show back together. Pratt had a lot to work with, but he ruined it. Megan didn't leave the show in nearly as much shambles as he did and he still gutted AMC to the point where it was damn near unrecognizable. He was the butcher of AMC, which can't be underscored enough.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I spent years hoping we would get an oral history like the OLTL book, but it’s too late now with so many having passed away.
    • It’s also strange that it was Monica! I just don’t think of her as the staring off into space type of woman! I watched a bunch of other clips and stuff from random 1978 and 1979 episodes. I’m so used to seeing movement from Monty’s era, especially the early part, that this really is a cool relic. Pretty soon you have scenes start at the new nurses station, the elevators opening and doctors walking to the desk to get their messages from Jessie or Bobbie. People often walk towards doors while taking coats on or off, many Webber house scenes start or end with someone walking up the stairs. This episode is even more static than some of the way earlier ones I have seen, where you would have Steve or Jessie at least going from the old school nurses desk to the medicine room, Steve’s office, etc. That bland dialogue is very much like what they have now. The show picks up a lot of personality. Knowing what we know about David Hamilton and how that really started to get the ball rolling as far as viewers you really see just how vital Lesley and especially Laura were to get things moving for them. They focused on the right characters to get fast results. The show now could learn a thing or two from this.
    • It won't allow me to watch it via the link; I am only able to watch it with the app.
    • Just finished the Goldfinch. Read it in 4-5 days... and it's a huuuuge book. Well... I would rate the first 500 pages a solid 10 out of 10... but then the next 300 were kind of a letdown... so the overall impression is something like - 7/10. It's just very hard to give something a full 10 after reading A little life.  Still... loved it immensely and would probably re-read it in the future. There is a movie adaptation... starring Nicole Kidman... that I haven't seen. 
    • I realize I harp on this, but I think he spending is relevant.  She's not just buying new wigs. She's building a mansion, she's funding a sports complex, she's paying for operations for people she doesn't know, she's caring for Peaches, she's buying apartments. We saw ?her get ONE check for ONE million dollars. That's it. I may be wrong, but I thought they said she'd get a payment every 6 months. Regardless, she could not rule the roost on $1M, and the show is not doing a good job there. Pretending that doesn't matter? I can't do that.  All they had to do was add a couple lines about payouts and payments.  In other news, I would love to know just how much Anita was putting into that trust as well as what investment got her what has to be an incredible return.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy