Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

Around a month into Douglas Marland's era, as Marland is charged with finishing off Roger's storyline. It just kept building and building.  Rita's kidnapping and miscarriage, Holly and Christina fleeing to Santo Domingo, Renee's death, Mike and Ed trailing Roger to Santo Domingo. It was just a gradual build-up to Roger's eventual "death" I give Marland credit - he did a heck of a job in sending off Roger. I'm still not sure if he was working off of things the Dobsons were planning, or if this was all Marland. Regardless, it was "can't-miss" TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Its really a credit both to the writing and the production.  The use of contemporary music makes it even more exciting, along with Roger's creepy clown costume, and that still shot of Rita's horror.  They made what was probably a 10x10 set look like a huge maze.

 

I can't watch this and not compare it to Another World's use of a house of mirrors in 1989 with Felicia Gallant and the murder of Jason Frame.  GL's was much more engrossing because the inclusion of the music.  However, both plots required a suspension of disbelief as to why the town sophisticates were suddenly interested in attending a carnival.  You know that if it was not required by the plot, Rita would have sent Crissy off to the carnival with some extra while she had lunch at the club.

 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Like Marland himself said, in Christopher Schemering's book commemorating GL's 50 anniversary, he knew Roger's death couldn't be anything small, "like a shooting or stabbing."  Not after the years of havoc he had wreaked upon so many people's lives.  But, more than that, Marland, for all his deficiencies as a writer, knew the importance of structure in storytelling.  There was always tremendous build-ups and payoffs in his stories -- payoffs that, in turn, planted seeds for further stories -- so that the viewers were left satisfied at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

1980 seemed a year of transition for the show...and it was a pretty interesting year as you saw the transition.

 

I do think Marland dropped the ball a bit with the Philip paternity story with writing off Elizabeth and killing off Jackie during his tenure. 

 

Oddly I think Pam Long's take worked because she shifted the pov from the parents to Philip.  He explaining to Mindy about those years..and his confusion over how they acted.  How Elizabeth leaving hurt, how he missed Jackie, how he didn't get along with Justin and how Alan seemed almost obsessive.

 

I do recall after that scene, Mindy and Justin had a scene..and she knew Justin was hiding something and I assume she figured it out and didn't tell Phillip.

 

And Philip realizing that everyone knew except Beth was so sad to see.  Knowing all this explained Philip's actions in the coming years.  His need for control (since he had no control in his formative years), his need to protect Beth (since no one protected him), and his cynical attitude because his identity was always in question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, 1980 was definitely a transition year, but I don't really remember noticing it that much until April of 1980. That's when Roger "died", and both Jennifer and Morgan were introduced. Kelly and Nola had already been inserted into the story the prior two months - cleverly, I might add. Marland took his time, and didn't overpower current storylines by suddenly shifting focus to his new characters. He knew how to introduce those new characters by anchoring them to existing ones. Nola and her mother, Bea, were tied to Roger, Kelly was tied to Ed, and Jennifer and Morgan were initially tied to Mike (and then Amanda, Alan, etc.). From then on, the purge continued: Peter Chapman and Holly were written out, Lucille Wexler was killed off (which I hated, as Rita Lloyd was wonderful as Lucille), and Jackie was recast. 

 

Speaking of which, when Cindy Pickett left the role of Jackie in 1980, I would have rather Jackie have been killed off at that point versus being recast. Carrie Mowery just didn't have the spunk that Cindy did, and would have been better suited as a recast for Elizabeth. However, Lezlie Dalton was still under contract and I don't think had a desire to leave the show at that point.

 

In regards to the Philip paternity reveal, I think Pam Long did a fantastic job with it. It had been an "on-air secret" since 1978, so the show did an admirable job of keeping it hidden for such a long amount of time (the only thing I can recall comparable would have been Mike Horton's father reveal on DOOL). The only issue I ever had with it was as soon as the secret was revealed, Long wrote out Justin Marler! The audience never was allowed to see the new dynamic play out between Justin and Phillip. Instead, Justin left Springfield, and Phillip was more or less back in the Spaulding orbit (until Justin reappeared again in 1990). From what I understand, Tom O'Rourke wasn't planning on leaving the show, Long and Kobe decided to write the character out. I never understood that at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

https://www.soapoperadigest.com/content/guiding-light-online-reunion/?fbclid=IwAR0bBgU9Xqvb_0S2QbZLkoBSe4lSii0MuahNRPn9NzuUZA3dL58frFJhOH4

 

Bryan Buffinton and Rachel Miner will be back on The Locher Room next week! They have both grown up so nicely and I’m looking forward to hearing them reminisce.
 

Edited by Asb23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Marland speaks about leaving GL.

Having performed on a few soaps himself, he generally was unimpressed with the quality of the scripts he had seen. He was pretty sure that he could do better. And so, after attending a soap-writing seminar sponsored by Procter & Gamble, which owns many daytime dramas, Marland was hired as a writer on "Another World." He subsequently became head writer of "The Doctors," of "General Hospital" (where he created the fabled Luke and Laura characters) and, 2and a half years ago, of "The Guiding Light."

 

It was on "The Guiding Light" that he achieved his greatest success, helping transform that video fossil into one of the liveliest, most imaginatively written programs ever to hit daytime TV. During his reign as head writer, "The Guiding Light" garnered many awards including two Emmys to Marland for his outstanding stories and jumped back near the top rank of the daytime audience ratings. An admittedly hopeless romantic, he often compared his work on "The Guiding Light" to a passionate love affair. He brought the program his own sense of style, charm and grace while reinforcing the presence of such discarded mainstays as matriarch Bert Bauer, the character played by Charita Bauer since the show switched from radio to TV in 1951.

 

But in the classic soap opera tradition that he knows so well, Marland's love affair is over. The last 'Guiding Light" Installment supervised by him was aired a month ago, and a new head writer, the estimable Pat Falken Smith, is at the helm. "Sometimes something happens and you just fall out of love with a show," he said from his Connecticut home. "That sounds corny and melodramatic maybe like what someone would expect from a soap opera writer but it's the truth. Because in daytime TV, you're working seven days a week and if you really don't love what you're doing, you can't do It; it isn't fair to the show. Some people can take the money and run, I guess. But I can't, because I don't want to work that hard unless I'm in love."  Surprisingly, Marland's falllng-out with the producers of "The Guiding Light" and with the sponsor, Procter &Gamble, had nothing to do with the usual writers' complaints about Interference with the creative aspects of the program.

Beginning in January 1980, when he started as head writer, he said he was given a free hand to mold plots and characters precisely as he saw fit. The only problem was the "creative lethargy" of executive producer Allen Potter and his lieutenants. As far as he was concerned, the last straw came with the firing of actress Jane Elliot, who played the Marland-created character of Carrie Marler. He bitterly opposed the elimination of the remarkably complex Carrie role, for which he had just completed another year's worth of storyline. What troubled him most deeply about the dumping of Elliot was that producer Potter had told him (and Elliot) that the decision had been dictated by Procter & Gamble for "budgetary reasons," and that the money problem was the sole reason that her contract wasn't being renewed. Weeks later, however, he said he learned the truth that Potter himself pulled the plug on Elliot "because he said he found her to be 'a difficult actress'. Her firing was last straw for veteran soap writer Douglas Marland. the studio."

Marland continued: "Potter lied to me, and it was one of many aborted decisions that I had to accept For awhile I thought I was crazy (for believing that Potter was so two-faced), but when I talked to other creative people in this business, I realized I wasn't." Once he reached his decision to quit "The Guiding Light," he recommended Falken Smith as his replacement. Although he isn't personally that well acquainted with her, Marland was very familiar with Falken Smith's work as head writer on "General Hospital" and, more recently, on "Days of Our Lives." In fact, Falken Smith's public feud with "General Hospital" producer Gloria Monty was even more bitter than Marland's own 1979 dismissal from "GH" by the dictatorial Monty. "I knew Pat had suffered through many of the same things I did at the hands of Gloria Monty and I wish you'd quote me on that. It makes you a cohort In this business. Even if you don't know someone, you have some idea of what they must have gone through working for that woman (Monty). We should have a club and meet at least once a year to compare scars and scar tissue."

 

Marland doesn't expect to be idle for very long. He's already created a soap opera, "New Day in Eden," that'll premiere this month on cable and pay-TV systems across the country. He also spent eight weeks during the summer touring as an actor in a road company of "Gypsy." His agent is entertaining offers from several network soaps, and he expects to announce his next writing post very soon. Until then, he'll nurse the wounds from his shattered love affair with "The Guiding Light" and prepare for his next passionate soap opera romance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would love to see Nia and Monti together again. I know he reached out to Tamara Tunie twice but both times she turned him down. Though it can be because she is out here staying booked and busy acting in the states and New Zealand. On top of not wanting to talk about her days on ATWT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Being turned down by TT probably didn't feel great but that shouldn't stop him from asking other actors.

It's a different show, different dynamic, different actors, no?

 

Sometimes it also has to do with groupings. From what I've heard, Scott Bryce was non-committal when asked the first time but said yes after Hillary Bailey Smith convinced him and he found out that both she and Gregg Marx agreed to appear.

 

Also, I am pretty sure that Andrew Kavovit became receptive when Ming-Na and Melanie Smith said yes. Perhaps had Alan asked Count Stovall, and he said yes, TT might have agreed. Then again, that discussion might have been too real for Alan, lol. Still, it could have been a real BHM, treat!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    •   It's just so much fun!   She really was what made the show come together. I remember thinking what a mistake it was to write her out temporarily. I wonder how I'll feel during this rewatch, but I'm fairly certain her absence contributed to the show ending after season 5.
    • Thank you @Paul Raven The Kay/Kill stuff sounds like fire.   @soapfan770 I saw someone asking about old episodes you had... in case anyone has old tapes but not a VCR, DM me, I am willing to convert them for free.
    • I think Krista is too hot or her. I think the current actress works bc she comes across so basic. Thats not a dig but she feels very normal and relatable as an average suburban woman. I think if Krista was in the role, Id want more out of her but I dont think Jan is meant for bigger things
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJogu0uJ7mE/ DAYS 9-25-90 First Day in Drag for Jack Deveraux who is allowed to be quite pretty. Matt Ashford plays him.
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJogu0uJ7mE/ DAYS 9-25-90 First Day in Drag for Jack Deveraux who is allowed to be quite pretty. Matt Ashford plays him.
    • The sad thing about SC being a great actor is that his character has never worked. Ever. And yes if I don't know what Liam is about and just focus on acting... I can appreciate him. But as soon as I connect him to Liam... I cringe.  Maybe SC should run till he is still young and find himself a role where he can shine. 
    • As I've said before I don't believe the fact that both sisters have cheating husbands (one in the past, one more recently) is a coincidence or anything random. It's pre-thought and pre-planned and the message is clear. Cheaters can be found in all shapes, forms and sizes. Some do it in the most blatant way, they are known serial cheaters and their wives know of their past hook ups (as Dani has already said... she was willing to forgive Bill for his previous mistresses... till Hayley came) and some are more masterfully disguised in the image of the perfect husband. The fact that Dani was jealous of her sister Nicole's happy marriage in the first episodes was not a coincidence. I knew it the first second I heard it. It made me wonder and think what is beneath Nicole and Ted's picture perfect life. The show painted two very different sisters and then gave them the same crisis. It was intentional and dramatically focused on how these women acted after that... How they kept or did not keep their dignity. The contrasts and the similarities are not random. They connected the two stories very well. Telling us that beyond the gates there are secrets... lies and betrayals. And sometimes the happiest ones have the biggest skeletons in their closets. Is all of this a cliche? A soap opera serial cliche? Yes. Does it still work? Yes. And did we need to start with something that is more universal and easier to stomach by the mass audience? Yes. This is only the beginning of the show in terms of stories and themes. We will have years ahead of us to explore different aspects of these people. The first couple of months it had to be a classic sex and betrayal story that makes more people hooked. It's universal. Again. Nothing so far about both husbands being cheaters is coincidental for me. It's too early for that.
    • Thanks, these are great! Joanne Curtis, another soap character punished for having an abortion
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Yes!!! Mona feels  like one of my aunts, love the way she carries herself. Loved seeing Eva pop-up at the gambling place.  Monday was all around good soap. Can't remember the last time an entire episode held my interest.  Loving the fallout and reverberations from Ted and Shea-Butter Sheila's affair

      Please register in order to view this content

      . Tricia Mann Grant is 90s early 2000s quality FINE. As nice as it would've been to see Anita embrace Eva, I'm glad she didn't because we can squeeze a lot more years of conflict out of Eva, Leslie and the Duprees.   Lauren & Sheila, Viki & Dorian, Katherine & Jill all gave us good conflict for decades. Hopefully this follows suit. I understand the concern. Right now there's an issue of quality of black representation on shows more so than quantity of black shows. I'd like to see more predominantly black sci-fi, legal, political, supernatural or medical dramas over the typical who is sleeping with who. However, this is a soap, and this is what happens on soaps. White soap characters do these things all the time, but have the luxury of being seen as individuals, not representations of their entire race. Husbands/fathers like Todd Manning, Victor Newman and Asa Buchanan cheat, lie and swindle all the time but aren't seen as a commentary on white men. Black characters like Ted and New Dollar Bill should be able to do the same.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy