Jump to content

Y&R: December 2016 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I like Noah telling Nick what's up. Thank god for a voice of reason in all of this. Nick the neanderthal is calmer today.

 

I agree that the Faith show is getting tiresome. Like I said, she's getting more airtime than half the cast. She's certainly been on more than, say, Neil.

 

I can't believe I'm saying this because I was so tired of her eating the show before but it was kind of nice to see Gloria and then everyone's horrified reactions.

 

Esther with Bella was adorable. I like that she's going back to the mansion but I didn't mind her at Crimson Lights either, not sure why that had to end? And it was nice that Chloe said she was lucky to have Esther as a mother.

 

Chit there's a difference between living in the past and educating your audience. They aren't going backwards by talking about the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

First, let me make myself clear.  I'm not feeding into your trolling as you can never have me beat from my early years here.  You are just another imitation of me.  I should sue.

 

I'm just using your post a crutch to state my opinion encase my opinion is disagreeable.  I could say that  Victor should dig up Phillips corpse and [!@#$%^&*] it and people would take me more seriously than you.  I'm using you as cannon fodder.

 

Anyway, what I'd like to say  to those who find the show boring is this:  You have Independence Day then you have 2001:  A Space Odyssey.  One is made to entertain and one is made to  exercise one's critical thinking skills.  Y&R at its best was the latter.

TY&R, to me, is that time doesn't age but life experiences do; Youth is relative while Restlessness is absolute.

 

Actually, I'm going to feed a bit into your trolling.  Here are a few questions.  In what ways are Jean and Shelly's stories academic in nature?  How did they ever change the way you view your life?  Did they ever tell a story that challenged or changed your perspective?

 

Answer in complete sentences and give specific examples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Exacty. I thought it suited her. I get her wanting to live at Katherine's house but working there again? I mean ... really?

 

Nope. And that forced JT and Victoria pairing just because they hump in real life? No thanks. I'm sorry but I never really got the JT love, but I seem to remember really liking his chemistry with Paul/Doug Davidson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
    • Is nobody going to mention the cringefest that is 'Carl Ivati'?
    • I've accepted we'll probably never see any of the Roger/Holly 1976-1978 storyline. Whenever any of Roger/Holly 1979 and 1980 storylines surface, those are must watch as they set in motion everything we saw a decade later.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy