Yes, I remember seeing a scene where Ridge is lying down and the camera pans over his silhouette and in a very obvious way lingers over the outline of his body and uh, bulge, for lack of a better word.
Thinking back, B&B was the first daytime soap in my personal memory where sex was "sold" in a manner that was so blatantly obvious.
It's indisputable that it was harder to win twenty years ago when almost all the Top 10 then is now on the HOF or headed there.
Dementieva and Safina likely wish they had these draws.
I don't believe that the ratings bear out her argument about the supposed difficulty with selling women's tennis.
Emma has shown that she has skills, but I sort of agree with Flavia. Barty, Osaka, Halep, Sabalenka, Mugu, Svitolina, etc don't seem inspired with Serena all but gone. They let an 18 year old qualifier ranked 150 who panic attacked her way out of Wimby take the US Open. It's embarrassing!
Folks on Twitter are jumping all over Flavia but she's not wrong. How is the new guard letting these babies come in and clown like this?
And look at the ATP. Norrie wins Indian Wells? Zverev, Tits, FAA, Medvedev, Rublev, Shapo are supposed to be the names winning these tournies with an anomaly here and there. Is this the norm? The inspiration is gone now that the big 3 are on their last legs?