Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I'm thinking you're right. However, that was such short-sighted thinking, IMHO.

Actually, Mike Bauer *did* appear in 1989 via a phone call with Phillip, when Phillip called Mike in regards to Phillip investigating Adam (Roger). I don't know who played Mike, but it was voice only, and certainly not Don Stewart. The weirdest part of the call was Phillip saying to Mike when he called (paraphrasing), "Hey, Mike, it's Phillip Spaulding. Do you remember me?" 

Please register in order to view this content

 

I actually thought that initial phone call was going to lead to Mike being recast and coming back to Springfield, but that didn't happen.

Honestly, Mike Bauer could have easily been inserted back in at this time, whether played by Stewart or someone else. Mike had been away from Springfield for 5 years, that it was probably safe enough to try to recast. Mike Bauer had ties to most everyone in the cast, so it wasn't as if he was a brand new face in town as had been the case with Holly and Roger, but TPTB made it work for them to slide back into the cast.

As for who would have played him if Mike had been recast, Don May would have been a "slam dunk", but I honestly think May would have been a decade too old to play Mike. Nick Coster might have been firmly planted on the West Coast by 1989, so I don't know if he could have been tempted to play Mike.

The David Bailey idea made me think of another ex-Russ Matthews from Another World, Sam Groom. I think Groom would have been affable, but still could have the "Law and Order" attitude for Mike.

Edited by zanereed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought that happened. I remember Phillip asking Mo if she had Mike's number in Washington, and she was like "I think I have it somewhere..." uh, its your brother in law (even though she was estranged from Ed at that time.) I remember at the time thinking it should have been Mike crashing on the island with Alex, not Fletcher (sorry, I could not STAND Jay Hammer in those years and they kept throwing divas at him to make it work when he just worked at a pal to everyone..) and then Mike finally catching up to Alan and putting him in prison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have been casually going through some 1982, some of these I'd watched 6-7 years ago or more and am refreshing my memory while they are still there. I'd forgotten about this cable car sequence involving Mike. Does anyone know if the original sequence, in better quality, is around?  @zanereed ?

(not a big fan of that children's show score!!!)

Please register in order to view this content

It also reminded me, of course, of the iconic (well, to me and @Soapsudsand Soap Opera Weekly editors of 1997's Greatest Soap Moments issue, anyway) cable car moment with Frannie and Daryl on ATWT

Something else that bugs me about this period with Vanessa is that any time she (and this happens with Josh too, but not quite as frequently) starts complaining about other people, or even venting about work problems, the Good and Moral residents of Springfield shut her down like she started threatening to set an orphanage on fire. While the show had its share of problems through the '80s and early '90s, I do like that during that time the business characters were allowed to just casually talk - and yes, sometimes bitch - without being put through such a bizarre purification ritual. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was Marland and one of his weaknesses that I alluded to in another thread. No gossip or bitching was allowed from anyone...only BAD people complained about other people, occassionaly someone like Lisa could complain about Lucy, or Johnny or Suzie Q but that was chalked up to her eccentricities. Polite wasps do not complain or gossip on Marland's soaps. Good people all have to LIKE each other, and business people are usually bad as they let their ambition get in the way of being "honest" at all times.  I loved later GL where people gossiped about each other and good characters didn't necessarily all get along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When I go through some of these 1982 episodes, I stick on the scene with Morgan and Nola (and then Morgan and Kelly) early  in the clip. It's a prototype of the "forgiveness" and "the past is the past" that Oakdale-era Marland would layer with many therapy sessions (I think they may have had something along these lines with Bobbie on GH  too but I can't remember if he was already gone by the time she was reformed). It's such a halting scene, with so much left unspoken, and no real attempts at forcing a sense of caring, as later happened with relationships like Josh and Iva. When Morgan  talks about just wanting to move on with her life, and acknowledging her own mistakes, you can believe it (and it's one of the flashes of Jennifer Cook reminding me of Kirsten Vigard's work). And you get a shameless Kelly Speedos shot in the bargain.

There is also a lovely scene with Derek and  Nola later in the clip. I know Derek was "boring," but I find him very endearing and real. 

Lisa Brown often  seems so frantic as Nola, but in episodes like these, she is just luminous.

On paper, the idea of Hillary using the "don't  tie me down" attitude of the early '80s to vacillate between decent but dull Derek and live wire, sensitive soul Tony has a lot of potential...if the people involved had more chemistry and if I did not have to put up with Tony going on sanctimonious tirades in every other scene...

Please register in order to view this content

 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have  watched various parts of the  Carrie story - most of them in clip form from the old ClassicGL account. The most memorable parts of them took place at the Amanda dinner party where she is dressed like a child and Carrie goes around getting drunk and rattling Alan with her shameless gossiping, including a lengthy bitching session about his daughter delivered right to his face. 

Surrounding these scenes were various moments of Carrie, in melodramatic voiceover, thinking to herself about needing to get away, people she will kill if they won't let her get away, and so on. 

This is a set of scenes I hadn't really bothered to watch  until now because, frankly, I'm not a big fan of the story, but these were interesting, sometimes not for the right reasons, but interesting nonetheless.

In these, she has to spin out some big lies in order to convince Ross that Justin (who was about to call after a visit with estranged wife Jackie made him realize Carrie had threatened to harm her) had tried to rape her. She also makes wild claims that both Justin and Jackie threatened to kill her. 

The whole thing is so absurd, you just don't for a second that Ross, no matter how much he loved Carrie, would go along with it (even if Carrie Mowery's Jackie was so high-strung and twitchy I  could actually see her killing a few people...). It breaks reality and any sense of logic in a way I usually don't see with Marland. And it makes me wonder just how Marland thought Carrie could go this far and still remain on the show. I know the Carrie story was not the only falling out between Marland and Allen Potter, by any means, but I do feel like Carrie was written into such a corner that I'm surprised Marland could not see what the outcome would be.

Still, Jane Elliot is always excellent, and it's fascinating to see her in a role so unlike her other work. 

I know the idea is not new to either show, but some parts of this, especially the various occasions (the June 4th episode has another) where sleep brings out the "good" Carrie for fleeting moments, reminds me of Viki's DID sagas, especially the '95 version. @Vee @SFK 

This episode also has some lovely Ed/Maureen scenes, and some of my favorite Nola scenes, which I've probably watched about 4 or 5 times over the years, where she and Quint listen to Bertie Higgins and they get to replay her Casablanca fantasy flashback.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Marland always said he had the next phase of the story planned out, which would have been Carrie integrating her personalities.

Don't know how that would have played out onscreen (endless therapy sessions?) and how the Ross/Carrie story would have progressed.

Maybe Carrie says until she gets well she wants Ross to move on w/o her. Ross steadfastly refuses but is tempted by another?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
    • Brandon Tartikoff saved NBC primetime. Brandon Stoddard got ABC Tuesday to rebound and put an end to the Aaron Spelling hit factory.
    • Awwwww Brad. I know I shouldn't, but I feel bad for him 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And yeah, agreed that Dante having animosity towards Gio is very forced and contrived. And it also has me concerned that it means the reveal won't be happening anytime soon.
    • God, I love that woman. Another amazing interview!!
    • We can only guestimate based on other characters. Chelsea was said to be 23 in the first episodee and based on Marttin wanting to run for President in the next election, he's about 30/31. Eva and and Kat are somewhere between that  so Id say closer to 25 or 26
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy