Jump to content

Ranking the GOAT SOAP


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Of all the daytime dramas that were still on the air by 2000, where would you rank them in terms of overall quality for the entirety of their runs? (That includes writing, acting, and production value). And list some reasons why you would rank a particular soap in the order you did.

My list:

1 GH: able to balance romance, business, and action adventure storylines, great sweeps plots such as the metro court, Luke & Laura were extremely impactful to the genre as a whole

2 YR: best production value, background music, set design, and solid storylines especially in the 80s and 90s

3 ATWT: very effective at a multi generational cast like Bob, Kim, Lisa, Carly, Emily, Lilly, Parker

4 OLTL: effective at creating an urban and youth appeal, great attempts at socially conscious plots

5 AMC

6 DAYS: loved the 90s period which bread life into characters like Sammy Lucas Stefano, Bo & Hope, John & Marlena; silly super natural storylines muddy the reputation of the show and soaps in general

7 GL

8 B&B: Great production value in the 80s and 90s especially, heavily repetitive storylines revolving around romance leads to trashy plots and pairings.

Edited by ironlion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Hard to argue with that list even if I wasn't a viewer of all of them.  I've watched plenty of classic GH to fall in love with its legacy.  I would rank Days a little higher, behind ATWT.

Edited by Spoon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just for shits and giggles.
 

1. Y&R (a lush, cinematic, thoroughly realized soap, which had the rare benefit of the vision of one writer, Bill Bell, for over 30 years, including the work of his protégé Kay Alden)

2. AMC (like Y&R, helped modernize soaps with daring, progressive content, with the singular perspective of Agnes Nixon, delivered soap’s most famous modern character in Erica Kane)

3. ATWT (Irna’s baby and the first blockbuster soap originating on TV, kept a lot of her DNA even as the show declined, introduced the legendary Hughes family and Lisa the vixen; underwent a major renaissance under Doug Marland)

4. GH (reinvented by Gloria Monty, took the genre to pop cultural heights never seen before or since; balanced James Bond adventures with family/romance/workplace drama; Labine/Guza both elevated and grounded the show in the ‘90s. Still I’d rank Bell/Nixon/Irna’s creations ahead of it)

5. GL (the original, dating back to radio; probably the soap alongside AMC with the most warmth and heart and sense of community; too erratic quality-wise to rank much higher, but the Curlee era was perfect soap)

6. OLTL (beyond underrated for successfully reinventing itself many times over and for its inclusiveness; still entertaining but lost a lot of its social vision during the Rauch years, only to recover it splendidly during Gottlieb/Malone)

7. DAYS (where Bill Bell first truly soared with his larger-than-life yet grounded perspective in the ‘60s and ‘70s; reinvented as an engaging romance/adventure show in the ‘80s; re-emerged as a gonzo fantasy show under JER’s polarizing vision, which deteriorated into madness later on.)

8. B&B (underrated and overshadowed by Y&R but balanced intimacy and the grandiose gesture, e.g. the fashion shows and over-the-top set pieces, very well. Bringing Sheila on was a stroke of genius, and Brooke Logan and Stephanie Forrester are two of soaps’ most indelible creations.)

9/10. PC/Passions: Meh and bleh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do see alot of similarities between Y&R and AMC in terms of having a core set of middle aged main players Erica/Adam/Brooke/Tad+ & Victor/Nikki/Jack/Ashley+, along with the glamour and romance element.

Y&R is my favorite soap but I always find myself ranking GH above it.

Edited by ironlion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love GH but there’s something about it that lacks a core to me, at least as long as I’ve been watching. Maybe because aside from the Quartermaines, it’s been much more about the bonds between adult friends and lovers than the passage of familial bonds, at least during the years I’ve watched. Feels a bit less rooted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always find this sort of question interesting and fun, but also difficult to answer for two reasons.

1. All the soaps have tremendous variances in quality during their lifetimes, with both excellent and atrocious years to consider.

2. Since many of the vintage soaps ran/have run for decades, many people responding to the question (myself included) have not seen the entire runs of the series first-hand, and I am always leery about critiques based on incomplete experience with any form of entertainment. Can we really give thumbs up or thumbs down to material we have not seen?

In my mind, I tend to rephrase the question as, "What do you consider to be the greatest soap of all time from your viewing history?"

With that being said, I would vote for The Guiding Light. It had an unparalleled run of quality from 1950 to 1982 (maybe pushing that to 1983, before the massacre of the vets), and then again from about 1989 to 1993-ish. So more than 35 years.

Granted, I felt the writing slipped in quality during James Lipton's runs (circa 1967 and 1974; I forget exactly, after all these decades), but stalwart producer Lucy Rittenberg was always there to keep the light shining bright and on course. So even when the writing was somewhat weaker, the series continued to be a good soap. For the rest of the 1950-to-1982 time period, the writing was quite good-to-excellent.

Knowing that Irna Phillips was guiding the show from 1937 to 1949, I'm tempted to opine that it was undoubtedly great then as well, but since my history with TGL only began in 1950, I won't try to critique the first dozen years which I did not experience first hand.

If I did go with my gut and assume the years 1937-1949 were as good as all Irna's other work during her heyday, then TGL's run of quality would be...half a century!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Interesting that Donald May has been mentioned twice. He's on my dreamcast list for Alan. He was somewhat older than Stewart and Bernau, but he could have played either role. An actor I thought about for Mike was Dan Hamilton. He played a role on GL during the 60s, but enough time had passed that it shouldn't have been a problem. He usually played smarmy characters but it would have been cool if they had gone against typecasting.
    • I like Jed Allan, it has to be someone who can play authority but "good" authority to oppose Alan's bad. As mentioned upthread, can you imagine how it would have been with Alan and Mike against each other, with Roger in the mix. But I would have had Roger, ever the opportunist to try to take advantage of their fighting to make his own headway.  Maybe that could have been the storyline, Mike involved with Alex, but the constant fighting with Alan causes a rift (she like Mike fighting Alan when it is to her advantage, but he can be a bit self righteous and I can see him demanding her to disavow Alan publicly..) so that is how Roger lands in her bed, much to the consternation of BOTH Alan and Mike. I would like to have a woman of a certain age being fought over by two men (really three if you count Alan.
    • Please let May have less garbage time. The Y&R threads have shrunken, whereas I can barely keep up with the Beyond the Gates threads.
    • The Liam cancer story was a failure from day one. It didn't start at point A but at a late point C. My aunt had brain cancer, and it isn't being told properly or correctly.
    • OMG, did Gio look good. Do not get me started on how good he looked. Lord. It's as if the writers realized Lulu had almost no scenes with her mother, so they wrote all this material for a 2-day Lulu/Laura therapy session. It was nice to see them connect, but I scratched my head yesterday when Lulu tried to connect her adoption story to Laura's life. That was a stretch to me, and I sign the writers were working overtime. Today, the script eventually got to the right place, but I thought it was overboard to see Lulu so worked up that she was near tears. That's investment in a story that's become an obsession.  
    • Absolutely is.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm on record as being happy about the mature turn with these new writers, but that goes away every time I see Leo, who's apparently as big a favorite under these women as he was with RC. And yeah, Javi could work, but as long as he's with Leo, he sucks, too.
    • I find Javi so obnoxious and almost as insufferable as Leo, but I still think he might have potential.  The show needs to ditch the Leo romance and give Javi some other interests and relationships.
    • Leo is insufferable. Why is he still on this show?  Javi can leave too. He adds nothing to the show. So now Shawn is going to commit a crime?

      Please register in order to view this content

      Everything Leo wears is ugly.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy