Jump to content

Racism and racial representation on soaps


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 722
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Surely not, but I'm sure it didn't cross their mind to have racially diverse dolls since the show lacks so much in diversity. 

 

Similarly, I think the lack of diversity comes from the top and stems from an irrational fear of scaring off the last remaining viewers. As if having black characters front and center is going to drive away white viewers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Direct link to above fb video:
https://www.facebook.com/TheYoungandtheRestless/videos/1392131277640398/

 

Youtube link to the same clip, but it might be geo-blocked outside the US:

https://www.youtube.com/embed/FqEoQBAzomI

 

The clip is from the 2006 epi that was rebroadcast today June 24.  Bryton won the 2007 Emmy for it.

 

Devon was talking about Drucilla but...

As I watched today, it felt like a parallel to Victoria Rowell. She's not crazy. She just defends what's right.

 

And even more, this clip feels to me like a parallel to everything that's going on on the world.  Carmen Mesta is being a Karen getting Dru arrested for no reason.   Carmen is afraid. Says Dru started it. etc. And Devon calls her out.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is an isolated clip, but overall, Latham wrote terribly for Dru even though she kept her front-burner. 

 

Latham had scenes like Dru breaking into Carmen's closet and madly ripping up her clothes with a pair of scissors, and of course getting physical with Carmen at Newman. She often wrote Dru like a "ghetto woman" stereotype in other parts of that story. Carmen was definitely insensitive and indirect with her animosity a lot of the time though, which was the opposite of Dru and really pushed her buttons. 

 

Can a Latina like Carmen be classed as a 'Karen?"  It's a complicated matter when all characters involved are underrepresented minorities. 

 

 

Edited by BetterForgotten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I read an old recap or summary mentioning Dru cutting up Carmen's clothes and I thought that was not really what Dru would have done.  The show wrote Phyllis cutting up Sharon's clothes, too. But Phyllis is supposed to be crazy.  Dru isn't. 


Carmen isn't a really a Karen, as you pointed out.  But I was trying to say that Dru being upset at Carmen, and even cutting up the clothes,  Dru getting physical with Carmen --- for those things Carmen wanted Dru imprisoned and the D.A said the best deal he could offer was two years in prison.  Two years in prison is not appropriate.

 

I haven't seen many of that year's episodes, but I've been reading the recaps for that year, and It seems like Carmen was written to be a manipulative character who "preys on married men" said one summary. I don't know. I haven't seen enough clips of her to get what she was really like.   Was Carmen simply being a bad person and trying to get rid of the competition for Neil and didn't care if imprisoning Dru was unjust?   Or was Carmen being a "Karen" in that the writers were using Carmen as someone who thought of Dru as ghetto/dangerous/unsafe and must be arrested?   I can't tell from reading the recaps.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yep! And it's SO frustrating.

 

I tried to get folks on social media talking about Rowell and Dru and was blown off. "It's too late" etc. It's not even about that. It's CORRECTING THE WRONG DONE TO HER.

 

The outrage viewers had over Loren Lott's firing lasted all of like a day or two until Y&R placated fans by bringing Mishael back at the same time.

 

Why is more noise not being made about a Black actress being told "we have no story for you" yet they have no trouble with everyone else. 

Edited by KMan101
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Thank you. I don't think there was much thought put into the Carmen character. However I'll say that the "Of course you don't understand, you can't hear me" was a subtle way to show how condescending and ignorant she was. For all of Latham's fault, I think we were supposed to be on Dru's side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Overall I was impressed with this week and fall out from the revealation.  I am looking forward to seeing the Nicole/Dana showdown next week.  I do wonder if June is going to be tied to Hayley.  
    • I thought Adam and Sara got married? Although I do not remember any mention of her when Adam returned for Blake's weddings. But MA certainly got the short end of the stick storywise, as Marland's obsession with therapy reared it's head. 
    • Didn’t Meg Bennett return to SFT as a writer in the last few years. I always wondered if they tried to get her back as Liza.
    • Millette Alexander got the short end of the stick once they killed off Joe. The Justin thing was a non-starter. Then she was briefly married to Alan's corrupt lawyer and HE was killed off. She was paired briefly with Adam and that ended because she believed Holly over Roger about the rape. Definitely, Marland had zero interest in her except as the therapist for the many, many of his female characters who needed therapy. It's not odd she left the show. One of the rare 1978 episodes on YT shows Alan going to Cedars for a physical check-up. He ends up with Sarah as his doctor. In between making mysoginistic comments about women doctors, he also openly flirts with her. It's very obvious they were chem testing Sarah and Alan. It's a really good scene. Bernau is both obnoxious and charming and Millette is amazing, trying to be pleasant and profesional without rolling her eyes at him, but at the same time maybe a LITTLE bit attracted to him. An interesting what-might-have-been. So it appears the Dobsons were actively looking for someone to pair her with, they just never found the right one for a long-term story.
    • I'm happy to read whatever you provide, @Paul Raven. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • First, let me say I love reading all of your takes and thoughts. They always provide a different point of view... a breath of fresh air... in this sometimes stuffy topic. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      You've inspired me to add my 2 cents about this product placement debacle.  I absolutely HATE the way they are doing product placement in BTG. I really hope this doesn't catch on or evolve into more and more of these moments. It's incredibly off-putting to place them in a highly dramatic moment where we are still on the emotional journey with the character. What is next - Dani spraying the house while having a nervous breakdown? It makes me not want to buy the product they're selling. LOL. That's just me.   
    • I always get the vibe that Martin/Smitty have an emotional abusive relationship set up... but I doubt the show will really go there with that element given that Martin is a Dupree (and we can't have the Duprees be portrayed in a negative light), and because it's a gay male relationship.   Even though abuse in the physical or emotional sense is a huge thing in a lot of gay and lesbian relationships. The Ashley/Naomi scene reads off to me for one reason....  Ashley was talking about the new scandal without any sort of mention and/or subtext.. considering she knew both Silk Press Sheila and Eva.  I'm not sure if the writers have forgotten, if Jen Jacobs isn't able to play subtext, or what.   It's just apparent the writers do not know how to write a young white millennial couple.. and perhaps they need to get a younger white script writer to be on staff... or let the actors play around with the lines to make them more natural/realistic.
    • This is as good a time as any to point out that the 90 minute show was, what I like to call  "cockamamie idea" of Fred Silverman, head of NBC Daytime Programming. He did so well at ABC & CBS but not so NBC. We learned this from a WOST interview with Pete Lemay, 2006, can be found on YouTube, audio only. Now, to be clear, Rauch was completely behind it. Only Lemay fought against it & eventually quit over it.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy