Jump to content

Backstage Mysteries: Forever Unsolved


Recommended Posts

  • Members

For decades now, thanks to the advent of the soap press and then later the internet, daytime TV viewers have become accustomed to hearing about the various machinations behind the scenes of our favorites soaps. While many problems within the industry still remain hidden from the public, if a situation is dramatic enough, and particularly if it ends up affecting what we see on screen, information tends to leak out.

There are certain problems, circumstances, or peculiar decisions made by the powers that be, however, for which we never get an explanation, no matter how much their effect on our favorite shows baffles the audience.

The Eileen Fulton Degradation, AS THE WORLD TURNS

One aspect of ATWT that kept me scratching my head for many years, was how TPTB degraded the once-popular, one-vital character of Lisa Miller Hughes Eldridge Shea Coleman McCall Mitchell Grimaldi (Chedwyn, but we don't talk about him, LOL), and ended up treating her like a minor, almost irrelevant background player.

Here was a character who had brought fire, glamor, tension, and excitement to the series for many years. Fans loved to hate her, irate viewers wanted to smack her, and Eileen Fulton enjoyed both critical and audience acclaim.

Yet, in the final years of the series, producer Christopher Goutman and "writers" like Hogan Sheffer and Jean Passanante drastically reduced the character's importance to the point where she was...irrelevant. No storyline attention was given to Lisa. Weeks would go by where she would be unseen and unmentioned. When she was present, her scenes were generic, and her lines written as if they could be read by anyone, by any day-player, rather than by the unique individual Lisa had been in her heyday.

After years of neglect, Fulton complained about her lack of screen time to the press, but the situation seemed to get even worse. Lisa fell further into the background. As the show struggled for rating, endless vapid and often uninteresting newbies were paraded across the screen and rammed down viewers' throats, while increasingly disenfranchised viewers demanded to see more of the vets. Bob and Kim Hughes were occasionally thrown a minor bone, story-wise, and even Nancy Hughes had a few significant scenes now and then, thanks for her relationship with (gag-inducing) Katie, but Eileen Fulton and Lisa were still neglected.

In a filmed panel interview, with Goutman, Passanante, and various cast members, Goutman proclaimed that to him, Kathryn Hayes, Don Hastings, and Eileen Fulton were the core of the series. Fulton thanked him and Passanante for giving Lisa her 50th anniversary scenes, but then made a snarky remark about being otherwise ignored. (You could see Passanante flinch, although she ducked the comment.)

To me, the mystery here is, why did the show keep Fulton around for so many years, if they did not want to use her? I presume she was on contract, and had to be paid for a certain number of appearances, even during the weeks and/or months when Lisa was absent completely. So why not simply dream up a quick exit for the character, and have her leave Oakdale, thereby freeing up extra money for the production, and putting poor Fulton out of her misery?

If the reason they kept her around, albeit on the backest of the back burners, was because of her history with the series and her popularity with longtime viewers, TPTB should have understood that technically having the vets associated with the show, but barely using them, and only giving them scant, pointless material every once in a while, was more of an irritation and insult to longtime viewers than an incentive for us to stick around.

Or, maybe not. The powers that be proved to be relentlessly clueless, and never learned from their mistakes.

Once the show was gone, I wondered if Fulton (or anyone else, like Hogan Sheffer) would be forthcoming about some of the backstage goings-on, and explain Lisa's subjugation (among other curious decisions by those in charge), but we have not hear much of anything. I would love to get a tell-all series of interviews with the former cast and crew of ATWT, the way author Jeff Giles did for ONE LIFE TO LIVE, with his revealing Llanview in the Afternoon.

In the grander scheme of things, one actress' being stripped of her importance may not be the end of The World (ouch; sorry, bad pun), but I do believe that one of the principle reasons ATWT ultimately failed was its hacking away at its roots, core characters, and popular themes. Decades from now, once-loyal viewers will remember characters like Lisa, the Hugheses and the Stewarts, but who the hell is going to remember...Janet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I just don't think the last regime ever liked Fulton or thought she had anything to contribute to the show. Where fans saw a living legend unjustly cast off to the side, they saw an aging has-been soap diva whose glory days had long passed ranting to the media. And the truth was actually somewhere in between those two extremes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know if this is considered a backstage mystery so much as just a bit of personal history that I came across a few months ago. I remember the original Stavros Cassadine on GH, John Martinuzzi (now goes by John Morrissey), and that he and Genie Francis were a couple back in the day (which, btw, as a young fan, was just a weird thing to know she went home with this guy who terrorized her onscreen but, hey, I went through the same thing with Matthew Cowles and Kate Dezina from AMC, lol). Anyway, they had a very bad breakup (he was an alcoholic, she left) and whatever they did against each other still bothers her years later. He said he's friends with his exes but not with her. He never really followed GH so he found out about the Stavros recast much later and he said Genie would have opposed his doing the role.

This is the interview: http://www.authorsden.com/categories/article_top.asp?catid=30&id=40542

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Y&R was bad about not using characters to the full potential.

Patty Weaver rarely was used in any major storylines and was mostly seen singing on special occasion and asking "Table for two " ? After several decades, they burned down Gina's and Patty soon disappeared from the show.

Casey Reed and Brock Reynolds rarely had any meaty storylines or love interest that amounted to anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This seemed to hit every single soap in the late 1990's and into the 2000's. As the actors got older, the shows pushed them off the stove, not just onto the back burner. if they weren't sweet or salty grandmother types for the younger women to ask advice, off they went.

I still think ATWT missed an opportunity by not putting crazy Barbara and Lisa at odds with Carly over fashion, and Lisa discovers too late how far Barbara had truly fallen and switched sides. I could plot 1 year of stuff just for this one idea!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I did it on the fanfic that I was doing this site but I wish that they would've actually paired the trio up and had them run a fashion house together. That would've been a riot. I would've wanted Babs and Carly to be at odds--Barbara wanting to stick to tradition while Carly wants to make their lines more youthful, and for poor Lisa to be trapped in the middle. I actually even imagined Janet, who despite my personal hatred for her, being involved [a ploy via Babs] as she helped them do a domestic line, which would've further drove Carly crazy.

I agree that a fashion story between these three, all who were known to be vixens, would've been comedic gold!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have mixed feelings about Fulton. On the one hand, I don't believe she was the greatest actress. She always seemed like a butterfly in heat, just fluttering aimlessly in scenes, often forgetting her lines. She was once supposed to be the nemesis of Lucinda Walsh, but La Walsh towered above her in every scene they shared. On the other hand, Fulton could rise to the occasion once in awhile. Her acting in the "John Dixon malpractice suit/ John's revenge" storyline was a complete revelation to me.....I didn't know she had it in her!

What's not debatable is how she was treated when the show ended. Love her or hate her, Fulton was crucial to the early success of ATWT. To have her given a few meaningless lines , and being a subject of mockery on the final episode, was contemptible. But then most of what producer Chris Goutman did at the end was contemptible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True. Goutman was clueless and/or insensitive, with no understanding of the show or its audience. So much time towards the end of this beloved drama was devoted to irrelevant, often despised characters, or newbie actors (even in familiar roles like Craig) in whom many viewers simply had no emotional investment. Not having Martha Byrne back as Lily, even though Noelle Beck made the offer to step aside, was inexcusable. Not having at least Rosemary Prinz and Patricia Bruder return as Penny and Ellen, for Nancy's funeral, was really disappointing. Why was Nancy's death so much about...Katie?

Even a brief 30-second scene focusing on Lisa, during the series finale, would have been a nice gesture. She could have gotten a phone call from her ex-husband Grant Coleman, informing her that he was returning to Oakdale with something very important to ask her about. Fans could fill in the blanks of the mystery for themselves, and hope that perhaps Lisa and Grant might rekindle their romance.

So many opportunities were missed by the clueless producers and weak writers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I imagine that even Fulton realized the writing was on the wall, so to speak. As an older actress, how many other job opportunities would have come her way? As previously mentioned, very possibly keeping health coverage played into her decision to remain with ATWT, but aside from that, at least on this show she had history and a legacy to stand on. Newer viewers, writers, and producers may have found her irrelevant, but devoted longtime fans respected her contribution to the show.

Like Emily McLaughlin (Jessie Brewer) of GH, Michael Storm (Larry) of OLTL, Susan Seaforth and Bill Hayes (Julie and Doug) of DOOL, viewers continued to care about them long after producers made their presence on their shows irrelevant.

To be fair, he also screwed up the final days of the beloved ANOTHER WORLD. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy