Jump to content

Y&R: New Head Writer


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 583
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

I'm just going to be blunt: SHUT UP!

How dare you tell people what they can and can't discuss when they are CLEARLY discussing Charles Pratt Jr. and how he compares to another writer in the genre.

  • Members
Posted

Lucci on Brian Frons decision to make Chuck Pratt head writer and the consequences of that action: My feelings are that Brian Frons was handed a very healthy daytime line-up when he arrived and then he hired Chuck Pratt to be head writer. Chuck said to all of us in a big team meeting that he didnt care about characters. He said, I will not be writing character-driven storylines. I dont care. In individual meetings with him, people would come out weeping and distressed because he would [dismiss their characters and histories]. Almost immediately, our ratings dropped. As actors, we did everything we could to save and respect our characters and their histories; although on paper nothing was there for us to work with. The producers listened to the fans in the focus groups, and fans are sophisticated because of columns like yours and talk shows and so on, and they knew the writing was the problem. Chuck Pratt taking AMC down didnt happen over night. And he was allowed to stay for two years. And unless it was Agnes or Lorraine, no one could dig us out of this hole.

This was Susan Lucci on Pratt really scary what she said about him. Lucci never complained in her 41 years on the show. He is arrogant and fits his own stunts vision. U will be begging for Jean P the show is bit boring but it's not offensive in fact I feel it was starting to improve but Pratt is far more destructive then Jean has ever been.

  • Members
Posted

Excuse me...I almost chocked on this statement. You are talking about the same guy that gave us the Golden Girls a few weeks ago as gay dating and getting it on?? The guy who does that for laughs so he can appear on talk shows to get buzz for GH. Yes he loves, cares for the genre he works for....NOT.

  • Members
Posted

I think in the beginning of the thread, I felt mostly amused by the humor, dark humor but still funny. By the time, I got halfway through the thread, somehow, strangely I started feeling a bit...I don't know sad?

Don't know why I should feel anything but indifference because ever since GL and ATWT got cancelled, I had prepared for things getting worse with this genre. Over the past few years, it has.

Logically, I understood years ago that this show was drifting farther away from resembling Y&R but from what I've read about this new headwriter, it sounds as if any remaining vestige of what made Y&R uniquely what it once was will be stripped away for good.

Years ago, on another board, I mentioned that Sony (not Steve Kent Sony, parent Headquarters Sony) was losing market share because their TV and electronics department was losing out big time to the South Korean brands like Samsung & LG-- who are eating Sony's lunch in the Television brand division alone and that Sony would start divesting themselves of low/no- profit divisions, if they continued to be 'in the red' financially. And Y&R was not safe as Sony could pull a P&G.

Nobody really paid attention to that post.

Well, years and lots of red ink later, Sony continues to lose market share and is divesting itself of certain non-performing divisions. The recently new CEO of Sony, this year, said he is unwilling to shed the electronics division (and he is a former engineer who believes Sony's identity is electronics like their TVs), so those cuts will be coming from elsewhere.

I don't know what, if anything this means for Y&R but I wouldn't be surprised if they were amenable to selling.

Even if the Bells don't express interest, if they could grab it up for pennies on the dollar, it may be hard to ignore. And with the way Y&R is going direction-wise, I won't be surprised if in a few years this show's worth is truly diminished to pennies on the dollar.

All, I can say is I'm grateful for You Tube, so that I can remember Y&R for what it once was way back when...-- a damn good show.

Thanks for the memories.

  • Members
Posted

Lucci never really complained either but she let it be known about Pratt. AMC suffered from not changing exec producers around 2007 to 2008. I am sad about y and r it shows they want nothing to do with what made y and r a success. Bill Bell would be rolling in his grave. Y and R has such a signature vision really only Bell could write. Pratt is a horrible fit for this show. He fit GH more then this show.

  • Members
Posted

After months of incessant trolling posts about how Pissante is great & is bringing romance galore with great, fireworky story arcs, now Bill Bell is rolling in his grave? Now you say that only Bell could write Y&R's signature vision? What happened to JP? Is she chopped liver?

And, once again, it's *than*. THAN.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks for that. It was great to see her in an interview. She's very likable. Although it was somewhat confusing. What new soap is she talking about going on audition for in 1973. Was it The Young and the Restless? The editing around that part was weird and choppy. I felt like there was a chunk missing or something. And I'm not sure why she was saying she got colorectal cancer from HPV and said it's because she never got the HPV vaccine but then said she's never had anal sex. I'm not a doctor but that didn't seem to make any medical sense. I don't know. Maybe I'm tired. It just seemed like some of this interview didn't make sense. 
    • If it helps any, the last script cover from the Elman papers that I have is from episode #3,736 airdate November 15, 1977. Writers are the Hollands with Frank Salisbury.
    • B&B really does look incredible. The lighting and the polished sets have made a significant difference how visually appealing the show is now.
    • I found the problem with the Labine era was that the show lost some humour when the Labines came on and it could be dull. They also didn't seem to understand some of the characters. As others have said, it looks fantastic in comparison to the next regime but I just remember boredom being the primary response.
    • Something I didn't realize: Frank Ashmore, who played Monica's investigator Corrigan in 1981, was also Victor, the third guy in the cockpit, in Airplane!
    • Thanks, maybe I will skim through those episodes.  I have previously binged late 1985 through early 1987; April-June, August 1992 (I skipped Carlo Hesser murder trial), Jan-March 1995 and I began watching in 2006. I just struggle to stay consistent with routines especially binging routines haha 
    • I could've sworn we went over the Bobbie thing a while ago, and saw her introduced to Rick and Lesley as "Nurse Barbara" in very late '77? Or was that early '78? I know the clip is online. Jackie always credited Marland with creating her IIRC.
    • Thanks.  Loon Lake - very on the nose. With that "dad" outfit Bo looks even more like Cassie's father...
    • Luna parachutes herself into Llanview at the end of September 15th 1991.
    • That lengthy flashback does make me wonder if she threw out a lot, but I agree it may have been too easy an urban legend. Would these have been her very first episodes? I imagine you could feel the big difference when Bobbie arrived, alongside the Quartermaines filing in, the return of Heather, and Lesley/Rick/Monica/Alan heating up. It does remind me that there must have been some dud moments in the 60-minute format we just don't see because little of the period is available in full.  I wonder how much longer the Dantes lasted under Marland.  David Hamilton is so disgusting. I appreciate the show making him disgust as some shows when they have stories about older men or women manipulating teens aren't as honest.  I can't see this Rick being friends with him. Chris Robinson's Rick, on the other hand, I could believe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy