Jump to content

Y&R July 2018 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

THANK YOU. It's sheer insanity that they continue to support that madman.

 

It's only a matter of time before Nikki and Victoria get upset and whine that they all must take a stand against him. This is one of their yearly plots. Next will be Nikki boozing it up and Victor going missing, presumed dead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 403
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

+1. The pairing won't disappear until Mal is fired. Mariah is another character that has been wasted in one awful story after another. To be paired with one of the worst actress on the show is a travesty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wished they'd gone for Myle. Perhaps, Y&R will be bold and create a 'real' open triangle with Tessa/Mariah/Kyle. Having Mariah as Pan would be more true to the character's history and keep the focus on the emotional/physical attraction to the person, not just the gender.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

No, because I don't believe one person, and one person alone, was solely responsible for the death and dying of this genre.  I believe it was a combination of factors -- the advent of cable TV (and later streaming), the O.J. trials, the era of "trash talk" shows, the fact that more and more women began working away from the home, the fact that the networks responded to all of the above by panicking, interfering and second-guessing (which led, inevitably, to more panicking, more interfering, more second-guessing) -- that brought soaps to this moment.

 

The question is, given its' current circumstances, can the genre survive and even rebound?  I know there are people on this board and elsewhere who say no, but I tend to disagree.  As long as viewers still want just a well-told story that matters to them emotionally, I think the soap opera, with its' traditional, five-day-a-week model, can make a comeback.  However, for that to happen, these shows need, at the network level, individuals with realistic expectations; a willingness not to play it safe, or resort to cliche, when it comes to creating characters and storylines that reflect and impact viewers' realities; and enough patience just to stay the hell out of the shows' way.  At this point, what do they have to lose?

 

 

No doubt, too, Jack will learn by then that he's, in fact, Victor's half-brother, giving him carte blanche to take over the missing Victor's empire and help Nikki back into recovery, and back into his (Jack's) arms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just feel like Passions might have put the last few nails in a shitty coffin. It was literally EVERYTHING that people hate about soaps and all the things people make fun of. Something like Spyder Games on the other hand was a great concept, but was hindered by budget. It was modern without losing it's soap, or alienating a "traditional" soap storytelling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

But, as you say, it was the last nails in the soaps' coffin.  It wasn't the coffin itself.  (For that matter, neither were JER's two HW'ing regime at DAYS, although everyone else in the industry, including his own successors at DAYS, emulating his unique approach on one level or another, certainly contributed to the soaps' overall decline.)

 

I'm more than fine with a lesbian couple (and even a triangle including a heterosexual guy, such as Kyle) on Y&R, or any soap. However, I'm not okay with Mariah and Tessa being romantically involved, just because it's 2018, Y&R (kinda, sorta) wants to push the envelope with a same-sex relationship, and Mariah and Tessa are the so-called lucky ones who get to help push that envelope simply because no other characters currently on the show fit the bill. (Although, if you ask me, Ashley, as one-half of a couple with a newly created female in her age range, might have been a better candidate, given her history w/ the opposite sex and this show's admitted difficulty in creating a viable romantic partner for ED who isn't Eric Braeden.)

 

What is true for heterosexual couples on daytime (or primetime/streaming, for that matter) should be true for non-heterosexual couples as well.  In the end, it boils down to two very simple things: three-dimensional characters and palpable, romantic chemistry.  IMO, "Marissa" possess neither of these qualities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was so confused why Devon was prying into Nicks love life and then it clicked and I remembered they’re brother-in-laws. Shows how little I pay attention to this show anymore. I was like uh? Do these two even know each other this well?     
    • The Bell soaps, B&B and Y&R: cannot watch. If I went by the last time I did I would have to give them both D- but I really don't think it counts when you're not a daily watcher.  DAYS: B+ (Now this is with the knowledge that for years I have given this show a D- because I've been a fan for too long to give it the F it deserved.) GH: A+ (With Korte driving this bus to me the show is so much better! IMO we just had the best NB in so many years I cannot count!) BTG: A solid (Things I love, a few I do not, nothing I hate, still find it in general remarkable.) As always, thanks for doing this thread. I count it. I always look for it & I always post. 
    • Okay, I continue to maintain that what is so good about this particular reveal followed by umbrella storyline is that you can see & understand many different points of view where there is not one bad guy or one 100% right person.  About your stated opinion, that Lois & Gloria did the right thing, you know that this was technically an illegal adoption? For it to have been legal the father, if known, would have to have been informed & have signed off on terminating his own paternal rights. And, of course, it is clear how many people they lied to.  Personally I feel like Lois is going to take the biggest "public" blame with Lulu a close second in the blame category. I am looking forward to a tongue lashing I hope Brook Lynn gives to Gloria. I continue to be more than annoyed with Dante. First his attitude toward Gio with regards to Rocco & a drinking game & its results. Second his attitude toward Lulu. Meanwhile enjoying the show every day!
    • Lois and Gloria did the right thing I feel knowing it was Camila that raised Gio has BL feeling some jealousy No one is saying that Camila was a bad mother to Gio I believe it will be Gio saying that Camila was great to him, thanking Lois and Gloria to get BL to see truth
    • Its realistic for Dani and  true of how the character thinks and operates. We've known her long enough to by that this would be consistent with her past characterizatioin
    • Random takes: - What was even the point of that jeweler guy? Also—Dani was borderline harassing him. - I know I’m probably in the minority here, but I want Jacob and Kat to happen. I need something messy to completely dismantle the Duprees—and Katomas just isn’t cutting it.  - I officially can’t stand Jacob and his wife. Same goes for Anita and Vernon. - Hayley’s corset was just as ugly as it looked uncomfortable. - I genuinely don’t remember when or how Derek and Ashley reconciled—and I’m someone who didn’t even mind their storyline! LMAO. - Tuesday’s episode was a mess. - Dani finding out about Hayley’s pregnancy and immediately thinking, “She’s faking it”—huh?! What writer thought that was a realistic reaction? I get denial, but that leap was absurd. I agree the ‘Leslie Victorious’ moment was way OTT. But hey, at least I wasn’t yawning. The following episode, where she handed over her daughter’s last few belongings was much better. - I can’t with the constant back-and-forth between Orphey Gene’s and the Country Club. I forgot this was such a soap trope, but even back in my loyal viewer days (late ‘90s, early 2000s), it wasn’t this bad. While GH has a ton of beautiful sets, we’re stuck with the same three—and half of them are ugly. Also: it’s been way too long since we had a party, gala, or any kind of event. I know the Richardsons’ anniversary gala (back in late April) has had a big ripple effect, but I was kinda getting used to those large-scale episodes. Fingers crossed they don’t go with Guza.  
    • The horrific comments execs and writers make when they justify rape storylines or keeping rapists as love interests is just so icky. I remember Ron Carlivati's comments about the reraping of Marty storyline on OLTL. Made my skin crawl.  No matter what you think of her, Susan Lucci could have demanded front burner storylines but she never did. She was happy to be part of an ensemble. I never got that vibe from Zimmer.  For me, Reva was just not a character I cared that much about after a certain point no matter how talented Zimmer is/was. I think Zimmer had a keener eye for what made a good storyline, but she was less willing to take a backseat if it meant someone else got to shine. I'm trying to recall if she ever mentions Michelle Forbes in her book--one of the few times the viewers did not care about Reva in a storyline. My sense is if she did, it was probably some backhanded remark about how she had to show Forbes the ropes.    
    • GH was good? I havent watched since Joss went away to do her traininig and Lulu had just called Brooklyn out for having Dante's baby and not telling him
    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy