Jump to content

Y&R: December 2016 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yet I still can't believe @DeeeDee Y&R went that route for Paul and Christine as something both Hogan Sheffer and JER had famously done with "no means yes" rape. I'm glad that DD, LB, and CLB were outspoken enough it was finally addressed on screen complete with Todd Williams berating Paul but still even by Christmas 2004 it bothered the jeepers out of even the most causal Y&R fans. Even with Christine coming back for Paul after he had been dating Nina was a bit far fetched....sure they were soulmates but the rape made things awkward enough for a decade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yes! She was on ALL THE TIME. Even when the story was going slow, Christine got a lot of catch-up kind of scenes with a variety of characters, keeping her on what seemed constantly. I'm sure that's informed by the slight annoyance she causes everytime I saw her, but still....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@YRfan23 I've felt that Bell was setting up the 1990s to probably be his most volatile decade yet with Victor and Cassandra, Rex and Jill, Brad and Ashley while counting on a Paul/Lauren redux and a Terry Lester Jack picking up a ripe Nikki for the taking with Leanna Love in the mix all the while Chase Benson would dump Nina for Victoria. The setup was all there but I feel Bell ended up playing the safer route overall as opposed to trying to deal with more complicated situations and relationships. I think playing it safe is why Bell started to have regrets throughout the 90s by the time he retired but still Y&R was never a bad soap because he changed course on certain things, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The funny thing is that for all the complaining about Y&R characters being in bubbles Cricket was the most well connected character.

 

Prior to entering Victor's circle in the mid 90s she was either married to, friends with or semi related to everyone else on the canvas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I feel like lots was in the works that was ultimately drop.....which is why I wish we had some of these original story outlines for the stories, if they still exist! LOL

despite this, the 90's (early 90's in general) are still very much IMO the golden age  and probably the decade Y&R and CBS for that matter garnered the most buzz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The whole thing was terrible & neither character still has really yet to rebound from it. The problem wasn't so much the sexual interaction but the lack of follow through about what it meant to their relationship. Especially as a reflection of how both characters viewed themselves, each other & where they were in their lives at that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Personally, there are so many ways to educate yourself about a soap. There's not really any excuse. I'm fairly young(ish) and have quite a vast knowledge of soaps.

 

Soaps have long missed the boat cultivating new writers. It's why we keep recycling the same few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
    • I'm pretty sure he was. But point taken. GL really had a thing for masked and costumed balls/parties in the '80's. Everyone looks fabulous, but those poor costume designers.
    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy