Jump to content

GH: April 2014 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Nina wouldnt be brought on for DM's character. She's pretty inconsequential. Its obvious that Nina is meant to be a spoiler for Silas and Sam. He isnt leaving, so the point of her would be to come in and cause trouble for him. Why would Mads pretend to kill her daughter? Well I beleive her story is true but its more than likely that Nina woke up and has led everyone to beleive she is dead, including her mother, whom she also wants revenge against

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

A spoiler for silas and sam? I guess that is possible but silas and sam are so recent and so inconsequential is there anything to be spoiled? We aren't talking Luke and Laura here. They have been together one whole story--starring characters not even on the show. Will anyone care they are spoiled?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So any guesses on who Nathan's father is? Are we to assume that its Faison? Considering how obssessed Obrecht is with him, I dont see her giving away his child. I think it could be Victor Cassadine. They'll probably use that link to keep Britt connected to Nik's orbit.

They are a couple on the show featuring one of RC's leads. Them being a recent couple means nothing. Besides they arent too new as its been almost a year. Does anyone care to have anyone come between them? Does that really matter? If it did, then these two wouldnt even have a story. The writing is predictable. If and when Nina makes her way to PC, one would have to be blind to not see that she will be used to cause some conflict for those two
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Are you sure he hasn't? There's nothing that says "Nina" isn't a hermaphrodite.

Hey, why not? Why should we be the only ones to suffer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Florencia Lozano is one of the few who could make that role (Nina) something. But really, it's the offscreen wife of an unpopular new character related to an unpopular new family of unpopular new people all introduced in the last year (plus Dr. Obrecht). You could raise Beverlee McKinsey from the dead and with this storyline and writing it will never work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched
    • I'm pretty sure he was. But point taken.
    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
    • I wouldn't call Tomas' cuts a modern cut. They appear to be a slim/extreme slim cut⏤cut slimmer down the sides, with a higher armhole, which pulls up/out, depending on the fit of the person's body. Again, I feel like Ms Featherstone is buying to fit the wrong parts of the body; instead of buying to fit their widest parts (shoulders), she's buying things to fit their middle/waist (which is the easiest to ultimately fix without a complete re-cut), and it shows in the finished product. And the only reason it irks me is because I worked in suit sales for nearly ten years, and I notice these things immediately. The fashion(s) on this soap are miles ahead of three of the four others (I like the fashions from Y&R), but the tailoring is a choice, especially where the men are concerned.
    • There probably would have been a good chance they knew of him, especially with his ties to Spaulding and his being involved in so much scandal (meaning there would be plenty of photos and articles around they both would have seen), but I agree the mask was silly, clearly just a TV moment.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy