Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of January


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Those scenes show what soaps should be about. Those were good sexy love scenes. It is kind of ironic though that this aired only a couple days after I said daytime had lost all sexiness. I loved the scenes and think we need more scenes like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
IA. Carly is not a lead character under this regime and does nothing but be lied to and react to the various men in her life (Todd, Johnny, Michael, AJ). I don't see how Todd elevates her or is used to make her character look better when the writing here only makes her look like a ridiculous fool for buying all his BS. Thank goodness they at least have chemistry bc if not for that, her character would be faring much worse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep! The massive chemistry is salvaging this, and I'm hoping that will change soon. I love Tarly more than so many things, but Carly is my fav, and I can't watch her be a chump like this. I've been tweeting about this for quite some time. I don't need an explanation for why Carly is so dumb because there is none that would satisfy me. I just need it to end! Carly is a lot of things, but an wimpering idiot she is not!

I've said it once, but it bears repeating. Why have a 50 year old Blair when you can have a 40 year old one? I'm not ok with this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have seen it called spanx sex and girdle sex, both hilarious. The odd thing is, I think RH is the first man on the show that LW has had real chemistry with, but I didn't think they had an ounce of it in that weird love scene yesterday. I found it extremely awkward, Carly looked very uncomfortable and uneasy IMO. I'm not sure what I was supposed to take away from it, but it almost looked like she didn't want to do it.

In other news (yes I am late but I haven't quite celebrated this yet) LUCY COE!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
    • Is nobody going to mention the cringefest that is 'Carl Ivati'?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy