Jump to content

Bravo's The Real Housewives of....


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cheap21

    4961

  • Taoboi

    4020

  • Cat

    4012

  • NothinButAttitude

    3973

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

The dog trainer that was unable to tame Kingsley is speaking out against Kim. He and the peeps at Bravo both advised her to have Kingsley muzzled at almost all times and she has ignored their advice which has led to 4 people being attacked by the dog so far. All four were attacked in Kim's home. The trainer was one of the victims. (TMZ)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There's no choice in this matter: the dog must be destroyed. Kim was irresponsible to buy him and when the trainer couldn't handle the dog, it was clear it was never suitable for domesticity.

But oh, Kim's harmless...except this is a prime example of how dangerous her stupidity and selfishness is. She isn't harmless, she's a menace because she doesn't live in reality, she lives in denial about how her actions have serious consequences.

Edited by DaytimeFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kim has gotten a HUGE pass for so many things because of her addition issues. Something like this though is open and shut. I could understand if the dog attacked one person, but FOUR?! Including her niece who he bit to the bone where she had to have TWO surgeries?! What is there to discuss?? What is WRONG with her? Instead of everyone dancing around her issues I want her to have to actually take responsilbiity for something and apologize. I've been long over her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As have I. Last season she shouted at Ken about Lisa's crimes against humanity (like not going to Kim's daughter's graduation party when the VanderPs were in Missouri), but when he pointed out that she missed a lot of events during the first few seasons, there was lots of "Oh, you can't talk about that. That's when I had issues. Those instances don't count."

Um, actually, they do count, Kim, in terms of Bravo's filming schedule! Bravo built an entire 3-episode SL around this at the end of Season 2 when Drunken Stallion couldn't show up to Hawaii for two whole days and a Bravo production assistant had to pick her up, sober her ass up and drive her to the airport herself. I'm glad she's sober (at least I hope she is) but she uses her addiction as an excuse from which to hide behind after her rageful attacks. I can attack you but don't attack me, y'all. Because I went to AA! And went through rehab! #KimRichardsForSainthood2017

Edited by Cat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

Wendy said Eileen Davidson played the legendary Ashley on Days @ ~10:30. I guess B for effort. Basically she says she doesnt know why Eileen and Rinna are doing Housewives. She says it may seem fun for a minute in season 1, but by sesaon 2 you'll be divorced and by season 3, your daughter will be twerking....lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand having a pet is good for people with addictions..but I think Kim would have been better with a smaller, already trained dog.

I get why Eileen and Lisa want to do the show.. I guess...but this isn't a show that will show u in the best light....and Eileen has a great image and I have a feeling it will.be tarnished a bit

Edited by Soaplovers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can see why Lisa Rinna is doing it - she isn't doing a lot else.

Eileen, I don't get it, but that's her choice.

I tend to think as long as Brandi and Kim and Yolanda, and to a lesser degree Kyle, are around, viewers likely won't return, as it will feel like more of the same. I think Andy Cohen misread what people wanted from the show. The Brandi material last season in particular was so trashy and so poorly communicated and so anathema to the original purpose of ROBH. You went from dinner parties to debates over whether someone is a racist or whether someone who is offended by racist remarks is the real villain. And the Yolanda/Lisa/Brandi stuff is something that should have been good drama on paper but instead just felt messy and dispiriting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't understand why people don't understand Eileen doing this. I could see her being honored that they're going for a top tier soap star and not just a random no-name. For Beverly Hills it makes perfect sense. I think a good number of soap stars wish they were in Eileen's position right now. They're trying to up the glamour because Joyce and Carlton, despite money, had no Hollywood connections and felt too down market for Beverly Hills. Perhaps they could've been on Orange County.

In other news, here is the RHOA opening: http://straightfromthea.com/2014/11/07/why-porsha-really-lost-her-peach-andy-cohen-explains-video/#more-155433

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can see where the money would be nice, but these are toxic shows, with fanbases that often love to pick and find flaws and get too personally involved. Their lives and families are the property of editing, and production agendas. For someone with a decent career in the industry, I think it's a huge roll of the dice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Basic script work; if it hadn't been for Jane Elliot and Rena Sofer, it could've been for any random character.
    • Because you are posting these things like they are true facts.  And they aren't. But whatever, Donna, you will just keep doing you.   Most people actually are trying to talk about GH in this thread.  Not random twitter/facebook/internet rumors you bring here.  I am just wasting my time even responding.    
    • This is a common theme with long running actors and preposterous storylines. Firstly they may relish the chance to play something different after years as that character-Ok I have an evil twin, possessed by the devil etc-at least it's something new to play. Secondly, no matter how dumb the plot it keeps them frontburner and valued to the show and the audience. Better than being a talk to. Thirdly, as VW stated in the end they don't have the power to dictate story and too much complaining can backfire and set them up in a negative light. Not a good position to be in with your employers. So they just buckle up and give it their all or act out the script till it's over.
    • Your use of the word "apparently" would need to include a source. Just your use of the word doesn't make it true or valid. Where would you get the idea that something has happened if you hadn't already received an indication from somewhere else, specifically a valid source (including Tabyana herself)? By using the word "apparently," you are implying this was mentioned somewhere, either in a publication or similar.
    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy