Jump to content

OLTL: Discussion for the week November 9


Recommended Posts

  • Members

After they spent last year telling us that it's OK if you rape someone, as long as you love them, I guess they needed to remind us of the bad type of rape, or attempted rape.

That they actually thought this story should center around Todd saving women from violence is probably one of the most tone deaf plots I can imagine. Tea and Blair both love a man who has beaten, raped, and nearly killed women, and doesn't seem all that unhappy about it. Tea herself was laughing about the good old days when Todd beat her. If anything, this should make them chase after Ross.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Charlie's a murderer now? :shame:

And I hate how they are suddenly making Ross this scary villain just to prop Todd, the hero that just so happens to be a rapist. PATHETIC WRITING, for this PATHETIC story.

The rest was great fun though. Still one of the stupidest decisions in soap history is coming up. John should be to take that bullet and die, but of course that is only what EVERY viewer in existence wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I didn't understand it either, I must've missed something. So Charlie murdered Wayne Landers and Jared covered it up? When Mitch said Charlie was a murder, I thought maybe Charlie killed someone, years ago, when he was drunk. I also had some problems with the action: After John busts in, Natalie runs towards Mitch?? And then John has his gun aimed at Mitch but takes his eyes of him to ask Natalie is she was okay???? Come on!

Yeah, I didn't like that either. This is something Bob Guza would do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This out of nowhere Ross/Blair [!@#$%^&*] is heinous, because they're trying to twist what are otherwise very decent, reasonable lines in the script from a desperate father into something eeevil. Unfortunately, this is a larger problem on the network, not just OLTL. We see situations like Ross's play out all the time with men or women who are not the "chosen few" of ABC Daytime - A.J. Quartermaine was the first, but not the last. It does not seem like the same people who wrote those cute Ross/Blair scenes a month or two ago; it seems like the typical ABC shuck and jive on "the untouchables." Who said 'we have to make Ross bad?'

Ross is getting the A.J. here. It's really nasty, and Blair looks awful servicing that treatment simply out of her own craven desires. I don't believe Blair would do that to him, or to just about anyone this side of Mitch Laurence. I think she would've found another way to play her angle without leaving Ross totally high and dry.

On the bright side, Jared and Natalie are true to each other right to the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it goes this way: Wayne knew Charlie killed someone, tried to blackmail Jared with it but he somehow ended up dying. (I'm guessing Mitch killed him?) And now Mitch knows that Charlie killed someone.

I want to say that Pamela ended up dying because she refused to drug Jared like Corrine and Nadine did with Rex and Brody, but I'm not sure bc that wasn't explained today. Why would Mitch kill Pamela? Why would she want to meet up Jared at the Buchanan lodge? Did it have to do with Charlie's secret or did she try to warn him about Mitch? Hopefully this is explained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The way I heard it was this: Jared discovered Wayne Landers was the stalker (or rather, Mitch's agent in the stalking). He planned to turn him in, but Mitch, anticipating this, had Landers play the Charlie card; he somehow knows Charlie killed someone, probably thanks to Mitch's digging into Jared's background - we don't know the details yet. Landers told Jared he was only after Buchanan money, so Jared told him to leave the others and stick with him; he agreed to help Landers stage an attack at BE so Landers could get some cash from the BE accounts, and hoped that was the end of it. Then, Landers turns up dead, probably killed by Mitch.

Jared was ready to confess all to Natalie, but gets a text ordering him to the Buchanan lodge, where he finds Pamela, who has no idea why she was called there either. The lights go out, then come up, and Pamela is dead. Then Jared is knocked out and carted off to Napa by Mitch.

I assume Mitch lured Pamela to the lodge in order to continue the frame-up against Jared. He made it look like this was a simple shakedown by Landers, then pulled out the rug once Landers was dead, and used Jared's disappearance to send John "chasing his tail."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I loved that Natalie and Jared are true to each other to the total end. I just adore this couple and I HATE that it is coming to an end. And I am dying to know just who Charlie was supposed to have killed (most likely drunk driving). And I so hope this isn't going to be the end of Viki/Charlie, another couple that I totally adore.

AS much as I've enjoyed the scenes between Tea and Nora, I am quite tired of all the bickering back and forth.

Don't like this 180 degree turn they did on Ross, I really liked him and I liked him with Blair. I am so OVER all this rehashing of Todd and Blair as a couple.

Totally and positively love Mitch Laurence, evil bastard. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Blair is irrelevant to the story, and I think Todd/Blair are dead for good, unless FL leaves and they don't want to bring another person in as Todd's love interest. I think this is about making sure that no viewers question the purity of TnT and no viewers question the idea that Todd and Tea will be wonderful parents to their miracle child.

Thank you, Vee, for the details on what happened with Jared. Besides what is coming up, my biggest regret is Pamela dying (Christine Jones is such an underrated soap actress), but I guess she's up there with Asa laughing about how she'd pulled one last con on the Buchanans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I missed Mitch's previous stint so I found most of the stuff today incomprehensible. Making Charlie a murderer was the oddest part. It made me think that this is a way to write Charlie out. He may leave town to escape prosecution or go to prison. I would think that he will start drinking again.

I still don't understand how Ross is wrong about Tea taking away his daughter. OLTL is a show that always had adoptions and non-biological families. What does it matter if Danielle is not Ross' biological daughter if they love each other? Danielle is not going to be thrilled that her biological father is a rapist so having Ross in her life would soften the blow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since Frons doesn't want to use Viki, I can see them keeping Charlie and just having him make rare appearances.

All the other women in Todd's life are fine with him so I imagine Danielle will be the same soon enough. The only question I have is whether she will find out about him herself or if some mean, mean person will tell her to ruin her image of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy