Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3458

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

 

 

This is about DHS-  Dept of Homeland Security

which was formed in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001

-- to protect the US from terror attacks.
(and they try to accuse immigrants of crimes because of that)

 

Regarding why DHS didn't warn anyone about the Jan 6, 2021 attack:

quoting snippets of the article linked in the tweet:
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/why-dhs-failed-to-warn-the-country-about-jan-6

“Nobody wanted to write a formal intelligence report about this, in part out of fear that such a report would be very poorly received by the MAGA folks within DHS,” one former DHS official who served in the Trump administration told TPM, on condition of anonymity to speak freely.

 

One whistleblower, ...... said that DHS officials had ordered him to stay away from the threat of white nationalism.

 

Former officials at DHS echoed the whistleblower’s comments, saying that a climate of fear had been instilled in the office which made intelligence officers want to “keep their heads down” for fear of their jobs.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes.  Honestly I would just have a ceremony in the White House and not even be sure that's safe.  Then the supremacists idiots will be yacking about them not showing their faces but I wouldn't care.  I'd do my job and not care.  The Rightwing is crazy and have been for 4 years because of Trump's tweets.  I don't even know what people's conscience's are when they even THINK about not convicting.  It's kind of funny to me because a few years ago they said the Democrats were imploding.  Well.  Now who is?  I don't think the Republican party has the backbone to do the right thing.  If this had happened under Obama.....................................none of this discussion of it being "too fast" would be heard.  They'd be like a bunch of Vampires all over us to get him out before Inauguration.  And they say he deserves to finish out his term.  It's all garbage.  Yes, the mob was wrong, but just let him finish it out.  It's the same thing for 4 years - just look away and don't hold him accountable.  And this utter garbage about a Nation that needs to heal.  Well guess what, healing starts with people being accountable and I wouldn't be looking away, but that's just me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

More on DHS - Department of Homeland Security.

 

Before the early 2000s, there was no DHS.
There was only FEMA -Federal Emergency Management Agency.

FEMA is known for helping with natural disasters and manmade disasters. Things like hurricanes or a bridge collapse, etc.

DHS was formed after the Sept. 11. 2001 terror attacks.
FEMA became a subsidiary of DHS.

 

In recent years, Chad Wolf was a policy official at DHS, who was one of the ones responsible for the family separation policy, among other bad stuff. 
His official title was “Assistant Secretary of DHS for Strategy, Plans, Analysis & Risk”.

 

In April 2019, the actual Director of DHS Kirstjen Nielsen stepped down.
Kevin McAleenan was named temporary Acting Director of DHS.

 

McAleenan was never ratified by the Senate, so never was officially the director.

Later in 2019, stepped down.
Chad Wolf became the "Acting Director" of DHS - unofficially.

 

In normal times, the President should have immediately nominated a replacement who could have been Wolf or anyone else- and then the Senate would have to do a formal confirmation process of the nominee. There would be no new actual Director until the Senate confirms him/her.

 

Trump didn't nominate anyone so there was nobody for the Senate to confirm.

 

Chad Wolf continued functioning in the role of UNOFFICIALLY running DSH for more than a year, even though that wasn't legal.

 

While in this unofficial role, Chad Wolf issued some racist directives/edicts/rules while "in office".

 

There were legal challenges in the courts saying none of his edicts/directives were lawful - because he was never lawfully in the job - because he was never confirmed.

The courts ruled in favor of the plaintiffs,
which meant that all his racist directives/edicts were voided.
 

In August 2020, Trump finally nominated Wolf, but the Senate never got around to confirming him. So he remained illegally functioning in the role.

 

A few days ago (Jan. 11, 2021), Chad Wolf announced that he was stepping down as Director of DHS, because the courts had declared he was not a valid director. Nobody knew what that meant -- but people wondered if it had to do with the transition to Biden -- or because he was another rat leaving the ship of rats.

 

Following what remained of the line of succession, FEMA Administrator Pete Gaynor has become the new Acting Director of DHS.

 

Yesterday (Jan. 13, 2021),

  • Chad Wolf reminded everyone that he hadn’t left DHS. He had merely stopped functioning as Director, and he has returned to his original job at DHS as “Assistant Secretary of DHS for Strategy, Polices, Plans” which is a position of some authority and does not require Senate confirmation.
  • Furthermore, he says that the newt Acting Director of DHS (FEMA's Gaynor) has issued a directive giving Wolf additional powers which include ratifying Wolf's prior polices/edicts, and ratifying stuff started by prior DHS secretaries, including stuff from the prior unofficial acting secretary McAleenan, and other officials.
  • Then Wolf says that he has analyzed all those policies, (including all of his previous racist edicts that the courts voided because he wasn’t in charge) and he declares them to be reasonable policies he hereby declares them ratified, and is putting them into action.

 

 

 

 

 

So basically as @emptywheel tweeted, he's focused on harming as many immigrants as he can in his final week.
Instead of doing his job which would be analyzing ACTUAL terrorists who are white Americans.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy