Jump to content

Soap Opera Digest Best & Worst of 1997


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I still have this in my 1997 collection

Please register in order to view this content

 

I was happy that GL and DAYS tied for Best Show because those 2 were always *my* shows, more than any others. They were definitely banner years for both, but I would actually say GL was stronger overall. DAYS had some great payoffs years in the making (John/Marlena/Kristen, Carrie/Austin/Sami/Lucas), but towards the end of the year, with Reilly purposely sabotaging the show as he left (so the critics remarked), it fizzled (think: Recast-Jenn/Double-Recast-Jack/Peter/Trent on the run, Viv/Jonesy, Josh Taylor's Roman "dying" with John/Kristen/Hope/Stefano in the jungle, Susan's antics getting goofier, Billie forced into becoming a heroine addict while being strapped to a bed, etc.). In fact, by the end of '97, DAYS finally dipped below being No. 2 in the ratings, even falling below both B&B and GH at one point. (They held the No. 2 spot consistently since February of 1996 - Thank you Aremid storyline!) 

 

With GL being in the lower half of the ratings pool from '94 onward (with a few exceptions in '97, '98, and 2003), I liked how they celebrated their small successes. They wanna tout being labeled "Best Show" by TV Guide and Soap Opera Digest? Go for it! 

 

It was the clone storyline, and having only two strong storylines featured is what killed GL's momentum in '98. For the first half of the year, it was Clone Story and Beth/Phillip/Harley, and then Clone Story and Ross/Blake/Ben. A totally imbalanced show. 

 

Edited by Gray Bunny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

 

It's interesting for all the doom and gloom at the time that GL's cancellation was imminent if GL got below a 4.0 and was going be replaced by a full hour of  B&B the show actually was doing quite well in the ratings for 1997-98 there as they mainly stayed roughly in the middle of the pack there at about #5-#6 out of 11 soaps on the air at the time. It was  great period, brought down by the imbalanced elements and stories you mentioned as well, plus GL became open season for ratings grabs from the clone to Lizzie the killer to lab explosions to the Nursery Rhyme Stalker. 

 

 

 

LOL I remember Christine doing that! I had wondered if the Keith Dennison would have lasted a lot longer with a much, much stronger actor as Tricia and Megan sustained moderate success. I also wonder if Bell felt any pressure from CBS during this era as this was at a time when CBS was #3 and desperate to make it look like they weren't dinosaurs at the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Was Bradley Bell the sole head writer at this time at B&B?  People often say that the mid 90s was good period for B&B, comes as a shock that Y&R had simultaneously dipped in quality at this time. 

 

Hmm what about Ryan falling for a 18 year old?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bradley Bell took over B&B sometime in 1993 I think.

 

I don't think Tricia was 18. I'm pretty sure the character was introduced as a college student close to graduation, so maybe 21 or 22.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Michael Logan (I think...not sure) asked about recasting her, given that older characters were leaving, and her ties to Carl and Rachel and how this would help given them story, etc. Malone said they weren't bringing back older characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know why OLTL was considered "great" in '97, considering the Labine writing regime took a wrecking ball to any sort of intrigue or energy from the Gottlieb era. It was endless Patrick/Marty and later Tea and her doomed romance with Todd. Say what you want about JFP, but she had the thankless task of injecting excitement, rivalries, and drama (Georgie's Death, the Bo/Nora/Lindsey triangle) back into the show after the dullness of this era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Didn’t we have a year of Passanante before the Labines took over? I feel like Michael Malone’s era had petered out significantly toward the end of his run. He was responsible for the “Brown Penny” stupidity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think they had any idea who he was this time last year. I think they were keeping their options very open. Same with totally dropping the Trina romance that was spoiled for him in the mags once FV clearly took a shine to him. Frank's priorities are bright and blazing in one color. I do think Gio and Emma seem to have worked out given that she is very dry and sarcastic and he is like a hot golden retriever, but I'd still play the field or explore quads with both with very different people - Emma with a scheming young man (of color), Gio with possibly Trina or someone else, or even a boy. Then maybe put them back together, who knows. But of course none that will happen.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • He definitely got lost in the shuffle last year. First, they were implying that he was Drew’s son, then he was nothing more than just Violet’s bff

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then they changed him to being Dante and Brook Lynn’s son, which was clunky at first but I’m enjoying the storyline now. 
    • GM is adorable, charming and fun onscreen despite months of nothing to do until recently, and has a bodacious bod. I'm not cosigning the show or this story - I haven't watched a full episode in over a month - but I think we're all taking the small victories in 2025 at this point. I'm open to testing this theory!
    • I think Jason might've posted some numbers for the syndication a while ago and the numbers for Falcon Crest was horrible. Like 1.5 rating or something, which was terrible.    ETA: it was actually Paul Raven:   New to syndication 60 min Fall Guy 67 markets 3.1/8 Falcon Crest 110 markets 1.1/5 To get into the top 40, you needed a 4.6/9 rating for reference - and Falcon Crest managed to get into a lot of markets to begin with. In the fall of 1985 Dynasty, Dallas and Knots were syndicated (show / rating / share / coverage % / markets): Dallas 3.4 10 51.7 92 Dynasty 3.4 10 48.7 47  Knots Landing 3.3 10 12.5 20  So, Knots as an example trippled Falcon Crest's rating with 20 markets - I'm sure those were major ones but it just goes to show you how much Falcon Crest bombed in syndication. 
    • It's not bad but the stories move too slow. It's the same problem when Dan O'Connor was CO-HW with Van Etten, they have a million stories and they all drag on endlessly with no resolution. I'd argue the majority of the stories airing now are good but you get sick of waiting months for something to happen.
    • Thanks. I must have missed that period entirely for Lifetime. 
    • Thanks. I know Marland did that type of thing sometimes but it's less likely with these characters. I don't even remember Alex ever mentioning him.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy