Jump to content

GH: November 2018 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Just finished watching the Escape Room stuff.  It's something different. I liked that they used so many characters. I just don't care about most of them.  With a better set of characters. This could've been chessy fun to watch. GH even references their menagerie of killer's histories. It would've been awesome if Ryan had killed most of them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also really used to love holiday episodes, and I especially liked the ones that had the sweetness and the joy and also had some melancholy or even scenes of people that were estranged.  Like real life, which is what soaps do best.  A mirror of real communities.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I like the hospital set, too, but it’s always so underpopulated it’s ridiculous. I don’t get what you mean about production values being excellent, because some of the sets look cardboard cheap to me, with blue tones used everywhere on the canvas.

 

The cast looks amazing? Uh...ok, if you say so. I don’t think the hair, makeup, and wardrobe is near as good as that on Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Y&R the clothes look so cheap or old. Nothing is properly fitted and the women’s hair is rarely even brushed. It’s eapecially apparent at group events. On GH from what I’ve seen everybody looks very polished and put together. And I stand by my opinion on the sets. They were spacious and we get a good variety of what they show at least from what I’ve seen so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Not to defend GH, because it's awful, but I think the 2000 episode is longer than current episodes so they may have needed that time to fit it in?   I think they cut some scenes as well from the original airing to fit the current commercial times too, but I could be wrong.  My memory may be failing me but when they did those classic episodes/Brenda marathon they cut some scenes too because the episodes were just a few minutes longer back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought by 2000 we had already gotten the 39 mins or so of actual soap in an hour--but in the past 1 years they certainly could have given even more soap time.  I know that when SoapNet would have marathons they usually would cut at least a scene or two of their older (but we're talking 1980s or earlier) episodes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She's a good start, Ninny should be next, she just threatened Ava. Same with fake daughter. But they have to keep Big Red to reunite with Willow, her obvious real daughter they are forcing on us. Whoever at ABC thinks that Nina is a viable character obviously doesn't actually watch the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Same here.  Anyone who voluntarily left Margo's penthouse set (except to go overseas or to Heaven) was immediately on my blacklist.  lol.  
    • https://x.com/MicheleValJean/status/1919575319146856657  
    • The penthouse was my favorite set... and it changed hands from Margo to Draper/April to Miles/Nicole then to just Miles... before he opted to give that beautiful place for that drab house with the even more drab Beth.  That was a jump the shark moment for me LOL
    • The storyline April and Draper are involved in during the summer/autumn of 1979 seems fairly "benign" but soon turns very serious.  April has a VERY intrusive, wealthy mother (Margo Huntington Dorn).  Margo knows that April and Draper (who've recently had a miscarriage and are theoretically never going to be able to conceive another baby) want to buy a house.  Margo hoodwinks them into buying a house they can't afford.  The house is listed at $100,000 (about $400,000 in today's dollars).  Margo pays the first $35,000 and leads Draper to believe the asking price of the house is $65,000 instead of $100,000.  If Draper finds out his meddling mother-in-law paid 1/3 of the cost of the home and tricked him, he'll be mad as hell.   Meanwhile, Draper has received a job offer from a prestigious New York law firm.  Margo pulls some strings and has the senior partner in the firm rescind the offer, to keep April in Monticello.  If Draper finds out about THAT, he'll be even angrier with Margo than he will be about the house trickery.  All of that is "bubbling under the surface" in the fall of 1979 but will be the next major story, as everything begins to spiral out of control.   Yep, you've got the Karrs and their very basic middle-class house, the Victorian-themed place where Miles and Nicole live, April and Draper's old craftsman house with the exposed beams, the Madisons & their Mission revival house, and Margo with her 1970s-chic penthouse.  Each of the sets is completely different.  And their budget was like zero, lol.  
    • It felt weird and out of place.  I get. While I agree with those on here that he's gotten better, it's still really bad. I'm not seeing the "good" acting some see...but I'll give him a B for being better than when he first started. There's potential. I'll leave it at that. 
    • It's like watching paint dry at a slow-ass pace. It's bad acting. Entirely. Excellent? With Claybon? Never. Ever. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ah! Good to hear. Isn't it especially odd to think that house fictionally exists not far from the Karrs?  Or, that it was designed non-fictionally by the same person who designed April's place?
    • Good to know I'm not the only one who noticed that. Strange and awkward, and I don't know what they're doing with those fades.   -- Finally, had to laugh at how many Emmys this board passed out today.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Not unless they live in an apartment complex. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That was bad. Product placement is fine, but not here, not now. Besides, no one carries their damn detergent to the living room.   Completely and utterly disagree. I thought Brandon Claybon was excellent today -- maybe his best performance since the show started. No recast needed.   Not unpopular with me. That didn't work. The montage was good, but 5 minutes of Amazing Grace? With all those verses? No. What kind of family breaks into a loud version of Amazing Grace after what just happened??? None. Anita's lecture to Leslie was great. Ending the show -- a really good episode with crackling dialogue -- like that was a mistake.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy