Jump to content

Y&R March 2018 Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 616
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

Just because the show does it doesn't make it so TO ME. I have always gotten the complaints about the death of Colleen, Cassie, John, etc. I do not get the complaints about JT. 

 

And again, weren't you or weren't you not saying for weeks that the abusive and controlling writing for JT was OOC? 

 

Bingo. At least to CBS. And after all that energy Y&R and CBS put into having the cast push today's show on social media. 

 

It's nice to see AMcD push the show. She'd been silent on it for a year it seems. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Thank you. I like the way the story is being written (that is hard for me to write because it is a difficult story), because it is very subtle. The verbal abuse is not overt, but we recognize it because we are spectators. 

 

Completely agree with you. This week has been FASCINATING to watch. If the show is going to be this upbeat, then I'm happy they are going to deliver plausible stories. I also agree that CLB/RIkaart would not have been as good. Also, I don't ever want to see Kevin again. I'm actually intrigued what Mal will do with Michael, when he decides to utilize him. The last several years, that character has been destroyed, and the acting is also to blame. 

 

HEINLE IS KICKING ASS. LET THE HATERS HATE. SHE IS DOING SUBLIME SUBTLE ACTING AND SHE ALWAYS STEPS UP FOR BIG STORIES. 

 

As for today's show, ok that last segment was great. The fall was directed in a kind of trip way, and did have me lol, but man when they have Victor/Braeden in scenes when he defends his family, that man always steps up. Those scenes with TL/EB were awesome. And WOW they are really going there with Jack!! This is a recton most definitely - but at least it's somewhat plausible I believe and doesn't entirely mess things up. Oh, and Marla Adams ROCKED HER SCENES.

 

EDIT: I don't read spoilers, and the show is much more enjoyable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Just because you don't care about JT doesn't make him expendable when it's only in service to a story a certain regime wants to tell. It's a waste of an interesting character with has strong ties to much of the current canvas that's played by a talented actor.

 

The deaths of John, Adam & Cassie still drive a certain amount of story but what did the deaths of Colleen, Brad, Ricky, or Delia produce? Dina has been off the canvas for years yet many SON posters bemoan her current story as a waste. Same with Noah.


And no I wasn't saying that about JT. I've always said this story made no sense for this actor (AH) or these characters (Victoria & JT).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As someone who, as a child, witnessed domestic abuse (I was personally never hit, just a sad witness), certain aspects are definitely on point, as hard as it is to watch. My problem remains twisting two characters to fit an agenda. I fully believe JT could be an abusive jerk. Many can hide themselves for a very long time. I don't really despise that aspect even though I agree it's throwing him under the bus for the sake of a plot. I also fully believe a strong woman like Victoria (well, the real Victoria is supposed to be strong) could be manipulated. But it's a bit rushed to me and lots of aspects just reek of plot for the sake of it. JMO. I'm not saying some aspects aren't being handled realistically because they actually are. As was the case with Dina's Alzheimer's. My grandmother had dementia so it's all too real to me. They've done a good job but it doesn't mean we have to like every aspect of it or the characters they've chosen to tell these stories. Because to me while Mal may believe he's telling realistic stories, and he kind of is, in a sense, they're just shock value plots to me. It's Pratt all over again but Mal's telling shock value in a different way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

But we don't always have to be blown away. Sometimes a story, can be just that, a story. Let's also not forget JT has been LYING TO VICTORIA, while trying to take down her father. I swear some people in here was saying that JT was taking advantage of her (sexually too?). The narrative on this board changes as quickly as the show lol

 

Well, Victor is Victoria's father and he DID bug their house so it makes sense... But I hope Victor does not completely take over this story, so I agree with you there. But, let's see how it plays out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This has nothing to do with what I was talking about.  If a story is just a story, than by definition that's not edgy, which was what the other poster and I were discussing. 

 

Also, this board doesn't have a narrative. It has many different posters with different ideas and opinions. Some people can think this story is great, while I think the set up lazy and weak, while the acting has been pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I don't know why the fact that JT is very much playing Victoria as well isn't brought up...

 

Currently watching today's episode, when was the last time we saw a Jack and Sharon scene? I remember when they were a couple, there was absolutely no chemistry, but it's nice to see different characters interact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I pretty much feel the same. I can believe JT has it in him.  I need a lot more build up to believe that Victoria has been sucked in to this degree though. They just got back together.

 

I can see why some people are sad that their memories of the Glow by Jabbot days are tarnished, but I'm not among them. I've accepted that this show is radically different now. I'm not sure it's wise to dismantle history the way they have, but I'm not sure there is anything they can do to staunch the flow of viewers anyway.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

My apologies then.

 

It sucks what has happened to JT. But, how many of us have people from high school who grew up "differently" 

 

I have no memories that are tarnished, because so much has happened between then and now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Les Moonves once said that he felt that Trump was great for ratings, so CBS likely had a directive to interrupt that came straight from the top.

 

 The irony of such a trifling matter as an executive whine session about the spending bill stepping all over Mal's vaunted big Friday reveal that they've been trying to promote so assiduously.

 

Somewhere SS and KA must be cackling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Out of character? Ashley has ALWAYS ran to Victor. And Jack has ALWAYS hated Victor to this. There is nothing out of character. I never bought Ashley/Jack as loving brother/sister, moreso just tolerating each other, but having a level of respect.

 

One thing I will say, after all the darkness, the show can use some happiness - and not the corny Mariah/Hillary humour.

 

Of course history matters, but people change. Look at your Facebook. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • And Kevin Mambo beat Shemar Moore for those two Emmys. I chalk up the wins to the voters not wanting Jonathan Jackson to eventually end up with a five peat (he won 1995, 1998, 1999). These were the 1996 and 1997 Younger Actor races. 1996: Nathan Fillion, Jonathan Jackson, Kevin Mambo (winner), Shemar Moore, Joshua Morrow 1997: Steve Burton, Jonathan Jackson, Kevin Mambo (winner), Shemar Moore, Joshua Morrow
    • https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/legacyremembers/denise-alexander-obituary?pid=209074143
    • Today's episode was excellent. Clearly it was confrontation day and they didn't disappoint. I'm glad they didn't forget Mona in all of this and gave us an opportunity to see how she's dealing with this. A major highlight for me were the Kat and Martin scenes. Their chemistry is off the charts and I don't understand why we haven't gotten more of this. I love how they take turns calming each other down. They feel really well matched and believable as siblings. Speaking of siblings, they anvils were dropping strong that Kat and Eva are twins but I do wish someone would mention that they are essentially hood twins which might throw people off the scent.  I'm one of the people who enjoyed Joey and the gambling storyline so it was nice to see him again. It was nice to see different characters like Mona and Eva in that element instead of the usual players. When Doug arrived I don't know what hit me but I just see a funeral in his future. He seems so hopeless and has the worst luck. I just can't see him surviving the year at this rate.
    • In fiction there has become an expectation by some that every Black character should represent excellence and perfection. It's not like we are talking about a Tyler Perry show where none of the characters are happy and everyone hates each other with a passion.
    • And on rewatch, I could've done without the unsubtle praising Matt like he was the only one who ever accepted Van as she was...but TPTB and their agendas.  It was totally in character for Vanessa to shut down emotionally until she was alone. While she could be volatile, both she and Henry believed in keeping emotions private.  Thank God it's still Bryan Buffinton in the role for both Henry's and HB's funerals. It just wouldn't have been the same with Ryan Brown, who couldn't act his way out of a wet paper bag. Roll My Eyes.
    • I can probably believe the Spauldings reacting that way, as Alan barely cares about anyone but himself and maybe his family, while Amanda only had that one experience with the Coopers, but I see your point. I do think 1997 was a better year than the last 3-4 before it, for whatever that's worth. You are right about Marcus. Kevin Mambo winning two Emmies (the latter during periods where he had nothing to do) helped.
    • I think @Darn @Faulkner and others have a fair point re: it being an unfortunate look and coincidence. I can see their point about the two Black husbands in rapid succession, without much time in between. Frankly, based on the early casting notices I thought before the show's debut (and I still suspect) that Ted's crimes might be far worse than infidelity or a secret baby. That would've mixed it up more. It's a soap, people are going to cheat, but it might've given them more variety if Nicole was stepping out first. Still, I wouldn't trade the Leslie/Eva reveal material for anything right now. Still, Fanfic Account #3 is just looking for any weapon to attack the show for not accepting his unsolicited scripts. When it's not the husbands it's Martin, or Chelsea or Dani. He's seething it got renewed.
    • I'm pretty sure Lucy and Bridget never even have another scene together for the rest of the time they're both on the show. Bridget isn't even invited to the wedding! The lack of community feeling and continuity of non-romantic relationships during this period is very jarring. Characters suddenly only seem to interact with a handful of other characters, rather than characters across the canvas. I'm deep into 1997 in my watch right now and find that it's even stranger because the show goes back and forth between ignoring history in order to manufacture some kind of separation between characters (for example, at one point Amanda refers to the Coopers as a family that the Spauldings "barely know," despite her and Alan spending the better part of 1996 going to war with Buzz over 5th street, and Alan has absolutely no reaction when he finds out about something bad that's happened to Abby, which seems pretty out of character given how close they were in 95/96) and ignoring history in order to create a sense of community that doesn't quite fit (characters who couldn't stand Amanda are suddenly acting all buddy buddy with her). The wheels really feel like they're coming off in 1997 (although I know some would argue that the wheels started to come off years earlier). Watching the Marcus/Dahlia romance again from a 2025 perspective is so weird. Marcus is a full grown man who must be at least in his mid-20s and he's dating a teenager who is not only still in high school, but is still fully a year away from graduation, and no one says anything about how creepy that is. I feel like the buzz around Marcus gave the illusion that the show was more invested in him than it ever actually was. Even during his "big" story where he's arrested for Cutter's murder, he actually doesn't appear on screen very often. He's imprisoned, Griffin is brought on, other characters make a fuss about trying to get him out, but there's a long stretch of time where he doesn't appear at all. I've been keeping episode counts while I watch and between Cutter's death in mid-November of 1995 and the end of the year Marcus/Mambo only appears 7 times (and of that only twice in December).
    • The letter reading was very emotional, and Maeve really got to me too. I was a little worried because Vanessa doesn't give a speech at the funeral, which surprised me, but then we got the private letter reading and her true emotional reaction and I was satisfied there. The YouTube channel I watch these episodes on (if not on our Vault), also had upset commenters talk about how Nola's line about Henry not accepting her at first/seen as a gold-digger was totally untrue. It's sad the writers don't do their homework and give fans the respect (and the characters respect). And yep, Bill got up and spoke at the funeral too, which was nice.  I didn't even realize that was Sharon Leal until you said it!  I had to Google it. I loved Sharon Leal in Boston Public back in the day haha. LOL at your Reva/Josh ALWAYS commentary. What is RME though?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy