Jump to content

Y&R: February 2015 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 610
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I see people is this thread worried about Hilary being killed off. I am almost 100% sure that is not going to happen. Simply because I don't think CBS is THAT stupid.

Bryton James and Mishael Morgan did a live chat on twitter Friday and they generated lots of buzz and excitement. The actors showed off the gifts fans sent them for Valentines day and it was nice stuff.

B9vcX1UCAAAGoZm_zpsnqa1jwaj.jpg

B9vuzGrCQAICo1i_zpsekfxkexr.jpg

B9vcLjMCEAEo2ZF_zps56725taz.jpg

Mishael%20flowers_zpsetgj9iyx.png

This isn't the first time she, or Bryton for that matter, has gotten flowers and gifts. The actors, and the show, have tweeted about it before.

This is the type of response the show has been wanting for a black actress and a black couple since Victoria Rowell left. Now it's one thing if the actress wants to leave. But it is something else altogether for them to fire/not renew her. CBS just couldn't possibly be SO STUPID!

Disclaimer: I mention CBS instead of Sony because CBS is the entity that likes to pretend at diversity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I stopped watching full time when she dogged out David Tom, but I could NOT miss Chuck Pratt doing AMC 2.0. THIS WAS MUST SEE TV!! There were no illusions about fooling fans into thinking this regime could be good, he said fcuk it and went balls to the walls with this insane garbage! I commend him for committing and just going for it. This was RIDICULOUS! This was worse than Passsions at it's lowest point. First of all you have all these disasters at once, then everybody is written in a shallow, out of character way and it all reeked of what he did to destroy AMC. How was approved? How was he hired? How can the cast, Angelica McDaniel, etc. be proud of this and promote this? I cannot WAIT to see where he has Y&R in a year.

At this point I've given up on Y&R ever being good again, but I am interested in seeing how far it can fall with people like JFP and Pratt in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well the rumors do say JFP went above McDaniel's head and regardless of if that's true, they have been hyping up Pratt's scripts like no tomorrow. It's unbelievable how bad this is. I didn't even find his AMC to be as bad as this. At least with the Twister/Lion King redux it made sense that you'd have multiple disasters based on the fact that the tornado affects the entire town. Here they have all kinds of disasters happening to all these connected characters and it is just too much. Couldn't the plane crash have been enough? Or the cabin nonsense? Or hell, even Avery getting punched? From a character driven perspective YES, but when you are a terrible, terrible writer (and clearly kinda nuts), you need to throw all of this in and see what sticks.

I'm scared for what his stories are going to be like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand the complaints about multiple unconnected disasters that were caused by the same storm. It would make more sense to have had the plane crash cause the fire at the PH and UG collapse. Let's say the engine hit one and a peice of the plane hits the other. But as things stand, it's way too random.

However, part of the measuring stick I use for writers is the use of the Winters family. These people have been on 3 days a week since Pratts scripts began. While it all might be [!@#$%^&*], for the first time in a decade, the black folks are getting their fair share of the [!@#$%^&*]. When was the last time anyone included them in a big sweeps event? Had an elaborate set built for their drama? I can't bring myself to be too mad at Pratt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Also, isn't she featured in the new bumpers they just made? I doubt they would do that only to write her out. I had serious doubts about this story with Neil/Hilary/Devon, but it's turned out far better and the adding of Colin to the mix (and Cane/Jill - to acquire Chancellor) was a good way to bring in more characters and spin off additional stories. Hard to say what any of that means now after plane crash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
I don't think the bumpers would keep her if they wanted her gone. But she is in the bumpers.

I am still pissed about them intentionally making Devon and Hilary an affair. Not sure what they were hoping to achieve by doing this. Why couldn't Devon finally have a rootable long term pairing that viewers could feel good about supporting? But I agree that it got better wit the CI stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If I compare this disaster to what Y&R has been for the last couple of years, I don't think it's terrible. At least things are happening.

I agree that they aren't going to kill of Hillary. I would be incredible pissed if they do though.

Also, Jill going off on Devon and Hillary made me roll my eyes a bit. She doesn't have to be happy about it, but considering she did the exact same thing to John, hell no, no need to have her berating anyone on this matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Looking through the comments on my Y&R FB feed, it seems the majority of people are happy with the "excitement" of the last few days and like the change. They are also HUGE Lily/Cane fans, Neil fans and Dru Fans. And most of them want Hilary gone. huh.png

Is it possible that head honchos at CBS think the last few days are a complete trainwreck and will make a change sooner rather than later?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Isn't that a contradiction? If the feedback has been positive, why would CBS make a change? It will take a minimum of 3-6 months of ratings data before CBS even contemplates a change. I think they will let Pratt mix couples up and kill off unimportant characters. No vets will be killed, except for Michael and that's been set in motion, IF it's to happen. Like any regime change, certain vets may be marginalized or sent off canvas, but I don't see any permanent changes coming for a long time. BTW - I would love for the 'lawsuit' to result in a settlement that brings her back - even if it's for a short 'test' arc. We all want it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oops, yea sorry about that. It does come across that way.

The second sentence wasn't meant to be a result of what I'm seeing on the FB feed. Just an "I wonder" moment - IF the head honchos at CBS don't like what they are seeing.

That test arc sounds great, I'd love to have her back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I am so over these reboots that on the one hand, want to trade off the nostalgia for the original and then change everything anyway. So those who liked the original will most likely be disappointed in the changes and it doesn't mean anything to newer viewers who have no connection. Maybe if they do have some knowledge of the original they will be turned off, thinking that it's some irrelevant old person's show. Anyone who watched and liked 7th Heaven would be way out of the desired demo by now.
    • I think that kind of thinking gives the writers a free pass. OK let's have Fred murder someone but not face any real consequences because Mary loves him. Maybe she'll be angry for a few weeks and Bill will swear to avenge the death but that will blow  over then we can just go on. The idea that a bit of self loathing and rejection is punishment enough is ridiculous. Especially when these type of characters never reform. It allows the writers to go for shock value over and over.instead of crafting storylines that really delve into a dark/ villianous character. Not many people IRL can get away with multiple crimes and still be apart of a community.
    • I guess Wayne felt it was now or never. He'd made a splash at Days and probably hoped that would lead to a primetime series. If he signed for another 3 years at Days then the momentum would be lost and he's probably have to stay in soaps like so many others. And in the back of his mind there was the knowledge he could probably get a role on SB or GH if he didn't luck out in primetime or Days didn't want him back. As it turned out he returned to Dynasty and got a couple of primetime gigs before agreeing to go back to Days.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      I got to agree. The show was a mess.  The stories that are not working were the ones featured in today's episode. That was a red flag indicating how bad the episode was going to be.
    • Thanks as always @alwaysAMC The remote was panned in the soap press at the time, especially Philip wandering around in the costume as well as some of the comedy.  I have to admit it didn't bother me, even though I knew how ludicrous the idea was of the Spauldings having a wedding at a theme park. I thought there were some fun moments and I did like the scene where Lucy got to cry and grieve over what Brent had done to her.  I think I was just glad to get away from the stories in Springfield, which were bad and getting worse.  There are a number of attempts at revamping the opening music in 1996. I'll be interested in what you think of them. I remember being glad they updated the photos but also noticing how cheap they looked. The show did need a new opening. Sadly, Rauch would instead just not even have an opening for over 5 years.
    • BTG: - Shelley Curtis first listed as Director on May 19   Another FOJulie director. 
    • It’s been awhile since I’ve seen a good soap cat fight so this was highly satisfying. Loved the Drew/Curtis scenes. Drew may not end up murdered but someone is going to try and kill him and it feels like it’s going to be much sooner than later. Who thought Dante ranting and raving for weeks on end would be good writing just to create angst between him and Gio. I really don’t think you needed to make Dante this fuc.king annoying.
    • I get what you're saying, in that this is what allows you to accept what you are watching, and that works for you. But for me, changing the traits of a character that much with a recast and new writing, then they are no longer the same character.  I am unable to accept that a villain is now just a nice dude because the show wants me to, I just cannot.  If they want a grey character, then they should write off the villain and *create* a new character who is grey.  I'll never accept that Sonny Corinthos is a nice guy, despite what GH wants me to think.  Same goes for the villains on DAYS. It's frustrating for me, and not enjoyable.  It occurs to me that I watch soaps to be entertained, and the current show is just making me angry and irritated. It's not fun for me.  I want to honor Drake to see John's story conclude, but there isn't much of interest to me anymore at all, so I'll probably stop following the show in a few weeks.
    • The wikipedia article doesn't explain much. I watched the Party of Five reboot, it was on Freeform in 2020.  It was five years ago, but I'll tell you what I remember: In the original Party of Five series , the parents died, and the five sibling orphans worked together to raise themselves with the older ones looking out for the younger, while managing the family restaurant.  The oldest child wants to have fun but ends up assuming the responsibility. In the 2020 reboot: The family were Mexican, the parents were undocumented, and the oldest child is an adult who could stay in the US for DACA.  In the reboot, instead of the parents dying -- in the first episode the parents were arrested by ICE and sent back to Mexico.   The five children were left in the U.S. to raise themselves with the older ones looking out for the younger, while managing the family restaurant.  The oldest child wants to have fun but ends up assuming the responsibility.  The teens go through teen stuff and the older ones explore careers.  The child daughter feels sad without her parents, and there is also a baby.  But the children were able to have periodic phonecalls with their parents in Mexico, which were very emotional.  The children hire an attorney to try to get their parents returned to the U.S.  The dad phones them to check on the management of the restaurant.  The younger children crave talking to the mom on the phone. The viewers also see how the parents are coping with the strain in Mexico:  the mom works as a nanny and the dad gets odd jobs-- they almost divorce, and the mom wants to stay in Mexico.  I think a few of the children got to take the bus to Mexico to visit their parents. The youngest child was a baby and the next-youngest missed the parents very much.  In the season one finale, it was decided that the youngest two would remain Mexico and live with their parents.  The older children remained in the USA and were following their dreams.  Season One finished airing just as the COVID epidemic began and everything shut down. The show was not renewed for Season Two.   That's all I remember.  It was good but very different from the original. Edit to add: Amazing how the world has changed in five years.  The reboot was filmed in 2019 during the first Tr*mp presidency, and aired in 2020.  The immigration situation was tense then, and that was explored in the series.  But it seems carefree in comparison to the real world today in 2025. Edit to add more thoughts.  I have no idea what would have happened in future seasons, since the five siblings were no longer a "party of five" at the end of Season One.   Supposedly the cancellation wasn't even announced until after the Season One finale aired.  But the season one finale was 90 minutes and wrapped up some lose ends, so maybe the producers anticipated a cancellation, and did that just in case? Perhaps if it there had been future seasons, the younger children would age and then return to the USA and the five would reunite? I don't know.
    • Probably not. Then again, if any character defined the final 25 years of GL it was Reva.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy