Members rhinohide Posted July 10, 2014 Members Share Posted July 10, 2014 Did I just make something up? I thought Stick told Christine that it would be "difficult" for Paul to father another child because of the transplant. I don't remember the reasoning because even with my limited knowledge of biology I'm fairly certain the liver has nothing to do with producing sperm. Maybe it was something to do with the medications he will have to take to prevent rejection. I can't remember honestly. But I think Christine's problem really stems back to insecurity about Nikki and Paul and them having a child together will strengthen their connection. I don't recall Christine being so desperate and clingy before, but she is now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted July 10, 2014 Members Share Posted July 10, 2014 And the same was true for MO's scenes with Ignatio S. I think both MO and RW should have been sharing more scenes with other actors who are stronger than themselves. RW's scenes with CK worked much better because she is at least competent as an actress and she was 'awake' for her scenes with him. She wasn't falling back on that giggly mess she often resorted to in her scenes with DG (although I see less of that now). It would have been smart not to pair MO & RW together until they had proved to be stronger actors. MCE has been the most impressive in the Quad of the Damned. She was worked with virtually anyone. She even showed chemistry in her scenes with Stitch. Taking her to a vixen has had a big payoff. Her character has become interesting, especially in contrast with the others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members dm. Posted July 10, 2014 Members Share Posted July 10, 2014 She's one of the rare bright spots nowadays; personally, Chelsea was a dud during her first few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ajsp35801 Posted July 10, 2014 Members Share Posted July 10, 2014 Agreed. She was a big flop IMO. However, she became far more interesting in that one scene with Stitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members soapsnstuds Posted July 10, 2014 Members Share Posted July 10, 2014 With all this talk about Christine wanting to give Paul a child, I have to ask: How OLD is Christine? I know Lauralee Bell is 45 going on 46 but of course, the character isn't. I'm guessing she's more like 33 or 34. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ChitHappens Posted July 10, 2014 Members Share Posted July 10, 2014 I hope we are not supposed to believe she is that young. No way! And Paul planning a kid? What male his age plans for a kid? All of this is just too damn foolish! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted July 10, 2014 Members Share Posted July 10, 2014 Cricket was a teen in the 80s, so if Y&R is going to try and sell her being in her mid 30s (which would take nothing short of a magical feat), they might need to burn all the footage from the 80s and give viewers collective amnesia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ajsp35801 Posted July 10, 2014 Members Share Posted July 10, 2014 Right. Just way too many onscreen miles to be younger than what LLB is herself. But 45 is not too old to want a kid. You see that a lot with a certain set. I can buy Chris wanting a baby. But Paul. No. But then again, this is a biproduct of this show's fixation with middle aged/older male leads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cyberologist Posted July 10, 2014 Members Share Posted July 10, 2014 IKR? When she came up with the baby deal I went Huh? when has she suddenly got intrested in having a baby? It was a screaming PLOTPOINT that' when I knew for sure that Dylan would be Paul' son. I think the story is more about Paul and Niki having (a fully grown) son together more than anything else for me...I realize he's too old for co-parenting and all that but its signficance and the impact of Ian not being the father of Niki' child...its corny but I just like the story and it is plausible that this could have happened; I usually don't like long lost storylines but Paul is so sweet; I'm happy for him. Also, I enjoy how Steve and Doug act off each other too. .... now that Christine may be aced out of parenthood w/Paul is another variable in this scenario. IA Paul shouldn't want another kid at this stage of the game; but dramawise this is some angst (or something). For some reason Ian and Victor scenes crack me up I like their acting dynamic too. So I enjoyed their scenes today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Taiah Posted July 10, 2014 Members Share Posted July 10, 2014 That's cause we were only told about her conning and scheming but she got whitewashed quickly after she hit town. That whole doe eyed gal, lead into cons by evil Anita and Chloe mess writers peddled never washed. Chelsea should've always been a schemer. I enjoy her more now. The rest of this quad sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members sheilaforever Posted July 10, 2014 Members Share Posted July 10, 2014 Coudln't agree more. Tyler on the other hand had so much potential. And he is stuck with that bland Abby. They should pair him with Lily or Hillary as they all have more live and are stuck in sub-par stories anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MoTheGreat Posted July 10, 2014 Members Share Posted July 10, 2014 The only time I think they take Bryton seriously not as a romantic lead but as a actor. Is when he's not an extra in Lily drama. So, I'm glad they are giving Devon his own drama. For some reason they will never see Bryton as a romantic lead, maybe they still picture him as Richie or whatever his character name was on Family Matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Chris B Posted July 10, 2014 Members Share Posted July 10, 2014 To continue the Christine discussion from the previous page, I don't think Lauralee or her age is the problem, but they don't seem to understand where to place her. I feel putting her (or Nina) with Paul ages them because he just reads old. Maybe it's because they keep putting him in the same grouping with Nikki. I feel Christine should've been paired with Nick when she was dueling with Phyllis and right now I would like to see her chemistry-tested with other men around the canvas. Why not ever try her with Jack? Or Neil? Hell, even go younger and you could look at Dylan, Stitch, Tyler or Mason at a stretch? I feel Christine is viable, but they have to understand her first. If I were in charge I would get rid of Avery and let Christine reclaim her spot as an important heroine and the good lawyer for Genoa City. They don't know how to look at their canvas and place the veterans as the key members of their age groups. Instead they will bring on newbies and bend everything to make THEM fit. That is not the purpose of a new character... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members cuzIsaySo Posted July 11, 2014 Members Share Posted July 11, 2014 Hes 42 to be exact and yeah he looks way younger than that which always makes me laught when idiots are saying he looks too old to be paired with RC (lucas on GH). But the same idiots are saying that there is no way a "good-looking guy like RC would look twice at a guy like Parry". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JONNYSBRO Posted July 11, 2014 Members Share Posted July 11, 2014 So how do u compare Egan as an actress to Amelia Heinle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.fbb6aa067610794e36433d57928a2f42.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.