Jump to content

GH: April 2014 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Chances are, though, Veronica would create two dozen new characters: one dozen for the purpose of solving the mystery, the other dozen to replace those the killer eliminates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She couldn't come on playing "Tamara Braun" and be great. This is the woman who they fired Natalia Livingston for on DOOL and then classic and comically proved even worse and got fired herself. She was awful on GH, beyond awful. And perhaps we could chalk that up to her being young, but then she went on DOOL--twice--and wasn't up to the task either time. She had one good week on DOOL maniacally saying "PATCH!" every sentence, but that was about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
to be fair there was NOTHING that could save the Taylor story as the character has always been awful and the writing was just dreadful. The character needed to be axed when NL was playing her, not recast

ETA: The Nina story is so stupid and makes no sense and if Ava falls for this latest plan than she truly is an idiot. I mean does she not realize that the paper saying that the pharmacist is alive is the one that her brother publishes, the same brother that JUST accused her of murder? She knows that his daughter is trying to pin it on her. And why would some local paper in PC be reporting this? Why not do a google search and see what turns up in NYC bc if the PC Herald is the only source, then something should be fishy right there. Also, if the guy was so sick and nearly died a few weeks ago, why would he be transfered all the way upstate? Why wouldnt the police question him where he currently is and in private without alerting the press ahead of time? There are SOOOO many red flags and holes to this yet for the sake of the plot, Ava will likely ignore all this and fall into their trap. Logically it makes absolutely no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know the killer would just end up being Monica who finally snaps. The town killed her family one by one, so she is on a rampage to kill everyone else. Poor us if RC tried to have LC recreate Gwen's scene from Loving when she came face to face with what she had done

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1922782226317529409       https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1931204864136396907
    • Very disappointed in the writers in the way they are screwing with Nicole, Ted,  and Kat to make Leslie remain viable. So many holes everywhere.
    • Somebody brought this up elsewhere which emphasizes why this NuTed appears as such a weakling? Why is Kat doing what HE should be doing? And that's everything he can to rid him and his family of this crazy woman. Kat is doing all kinds of things she shouldn't do but now I understand her more. She can't count on her father to eliminate this woman because he's a wimp. He's been too busy inviting her into his home and serving her drinks and offering her invitations to birthday parties. WIMP!!!!
    • It's Men's Mental Health Month.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • This is (maybe) overly simplistic and nonsoapy, but Doug needs to go to Gamblers Anonymous, to deal with the addictive neurological excitement hits that gambling gives him - and which control his life. Vanessa needs to go to therapy to find ways to remain healthfully lusty and sex-positive, but to stay away from anyone who would demean her.
    • YT keeps commending GL clips to me. I discovered Kathleen Cullen was on in Christmas 1987. Was there any talk of making it permanent  or was this just a special visit? I wish they had made the visit permanent. I liked her chemistry with Grant Aleksander.  
    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay. This is where I wish I knew Roger's history better.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • GROSS. Michael Swan was hot back in his ATWT days. Now he's 76 and WAY past his hot years.    
    • Since she kidnapped, locked up and tried to kill her father's wife I'd say that is still a pretty big deal
    • I'm good with the gushing, too. There aren't many soap icons like John Black, and that's important to celebrate and remember. And yes, life does go on for other characters, but as they say, timing is everything. Going sky diving the day before the funeral? And during a week of shows that were so powerful emotionally? No.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy