Jump to content

Y&R: TMZ reporting on Michael Muhney


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That is to be expected. It is always the defense of a man who sexually abuses or rapes a woman. She wanted it. She flirted with him. Look what she was wearing. She wanted to be tied up. She wanted to be beat up. I could go on and on. However, I love that so many posters on the soap boards are rejecting these defenses for MM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I simply cannot read any comments at the bottom of articles and blog posts anymore, everyone knows by now that for every 1 insightful comment there will be 7 or 8 stupid comments. I just refuse to waste my time and energy. In fact, I decided I was just going to stop reading articles and blog posts from elsewhere (that SON policy makes a whole lot of sense suddenly).

The attacks on HHK were just starting to infuriate me. And I mean REALLY. INFURIATE. ME. So I had to stop. And for me, there are personal reasons why I am getting increasingly angry at why I'm becoming incensed with the aspect of people, men and particularly woman, verbally attacking a young woman, making assumptions and casting aspersions on her character and proclivities based on how 'well endowed' she supposedly is. I won't get into it, but you can probably guess why. I am loathe to put out the personal details of my life, with anyone. I know we live in a confessional culture, but I'm not into it on a personal level, although I don't judge those who are.

Those people who believe that somehow someone how has a physique that is considered attractive or is buxom and attractive somehow courts unwanted attention from someone overly aggressive predo needs to be

Smacked. HARD. I mean, with a 2X4. I don't advocate violence but I'm very angry with this aspect.

Maybe I need to get offline and away from the social regression of the world of Daytime Fanaticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My limit is people trying to pseudo-intellectualize this into talking about the need at Y&R for equal-opportunity sensitivity and Good Touch seminars so everyone (i.e., the women) can understand it's not okay to touch each other in their bathing suit area regardless of whether or not it may be "harmless fun gone wrong." How about we start with talking about how the dude needed to be fired?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The most bizarre comment I've read on this was one that said this was like All About Eve, that Hunter was Eve, that she'd pushed Michelle Stafford off the show as Michelle was the Bette Davis, and Michael Muhney was the "creepy older man" in the film that she stole from Stafford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy