Jump to content

AMC: The Prospect Park Era (old production thread)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

In your opinion. Sure, there's a few cast members that AMC should get that they haven't got, yet, mostly due to scheduling that will most likely eventually clear. A few. OLTL has the same problem.

You can't judge the status of the older actors on the show until you see the show. I will give you that it's probably likely that a lot of story for the older actors will now revolve around the younger actors. That's often the cycle of soaps though. There could very well be a balance, too. We don't know yet.

AMC suddenly has a lot of teens. Guess what? OLTL already had a lot of teens. Unlike with the 1996 teen explosion on AMC, even viewers who watched AMC for a couple of years will be pretty familiar with most of these young characters whom have experienced a growth spurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A strong EP is better than a Strong HW in my opinion. Megan's run with Felicia VS with Megan's run with Cruthers. Ginger Smith has been with the show for many years ans isn't she the one who David Canary admires? Anyway, if the HW's are not doing good she can fire them and replace them with someone who can write for the show. Even if the OLTL HW is the great Late-Doug Marland I still wouldn't assume OLTL would be better than it was previously with an EP with virtually no experience during OLTL's golden years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You guys do realize that one of the main strengths of All My Children was its teen section? In fact, when the show started in 1970.. the main storyline was Phil/Tara.. with both Chuck and Erica as outsiders each wanting Phil and Tara to break up. While Chuck secretly wanted them to break up, Erica went out of her way to break them up. In fact, the main story involved Phil's paternity. It seems like the gist of the first several months involved that secret and most of the characters were involved in that story.

I figure as long as the current crop of young characters are connected to the vets (with the vets having equal screen and story time) then I think all will be well.

For me, All My Children seemed to have a heavy focus on young characters.. along with a healthy dose of adult/older characters within a community. One life to live, on the other hand, didnt impress upon me as a teen oriented show... its heavy focus in the early years was diversity ( in terms of class, ethnicity, religion, etc).. which I'm hoping the reboot goes back to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And there's the key. You personally don't like teen characters. That's different than "This is not the way to relaunch AMC!!!"

Personally, I'm halfway through a rewatch of Friday Night Lights and that reminded me that if the writing is good, stories with teens can be just as riveting as adult stories.

The bottom line is that most of us are willing to wait and see what happens. You don't seem to be willing to do that. Fine, but when you start throwing out hysteria like "OLTL has 90% of its cast" and talk of "limited" vets and returns like it's fact, don't get salty when someone pushes back on that. We've got enough bad information and rumors flying out here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know but I assume, maybe inaccurately, the cemetery is somewhat close to the club. They at least have to be in the same neighborhood.

Same here, but why is OLTL - which had a lot of teens in its last years - somehow golden for you and not AMC - which will now have a lot of teens?

I stopped watching AMC in 1996 due to the departure of SMG and CMcC as they were attached to my two favorite story-lines on the show (Erica/Kendall, Tad/Dixie). I also quit because the Santos family had overtaken the show and there were suddenly a bunch of teens that I was not familiar with. Bobby? Kelsey? I'm familiar with Miranda and AJ and Petey and they will be central to the teen and young adult story. I don't see any major new family (Griffin and Cara are just brother and sister) marking the scene.

Are you just upset about MEK (<-- who made the choice to wait)? If I'm remembering posters correctly, I think you've been a little upset about no-MEK for some time. If I'm incorrect, nevermind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

wub.png

For once, Angela, you and I are on the same page. It's not secret that I didn't watch much of OLTL during the final few years of its run because there were too many teens and newbies, mostly shirtless young men. I also never liked Natalie or Rex so having them get so much of the storyline was a turnoff for me. By contrast, it looks like AMC is incorporating these new characters into the fabric of the main families and with the vets they have so far like David Canary, Jill Larson and Julia Barr, I expect they'll get stories of their own too, just as we already know Debbi Morgan and Darnelle Williams will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy