Jump to content

Melissa Reeves Hates Gays


ivanmmd

Recommended Posts

  • Members

What is this insanity? blink.png People have EVERY right to criticize ignorance when a person opens their mouth and says ignorant things. For some reason people confuse tolerance with acceptance of any and all things, when that is not what it is. Tolerance is freedom from bigotry, it does not mean being apathetic and permissive regardless of ideas, beliefs or thoughts. It simply means having an open mind and hearing their argument. If that argument is bullshit then the argument is bullshit, an unhealthy opinion/view should never be accepted as is without someone challenging it. I'm sorry but your point is bullshit, she does not get to say the things she says and then escape criticism for it underneath the veil of "her expressing her opinion", no as a woman who believes what she believes she should stand by her words and that means also listening for the criticism that people have against her.

Yes, I'm so sorry, everyone should just shut up about the fact that Chick-Fil-A gives billions of dollars to interests groups that aim to hurt and kill human beings simply because of their sexual orientation. We are soo self-righteous. How dare us. We should totally come off this cross and let them burn all gays, lesbians, bisexuals and queer people with the wood. rolleyes.gif

Do you realize what you just said? Amazon and Ben&Jerry's aim to franchise people and give to them in terms of charity and contributions that help people. Chick-Fil-A gives money to organizations that aim to disenfranchise gay people and hurt/kill them. I mean are you for real right now? Is this real life? Do you honestly not understand the difference between the two situations?

Gays are also being targeted by Chick-fil-a weither you want to realize that or not. They give money to organizations that aim to hurt gay people. Are you just glossing over that in your aim to protect the very people tying the noose around those individuals necks? Unreal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 235
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I suspect neither of the Reeveses are overtly or entirely consciously homophobic or bigoted. They've both worked in daytime and showbiz for decades and they know how much of a force gays and lesbians are in that industry, making them beautiful and keeping them together in front of and behind the camera.

Unfortunately, I think that like a lot of upwardly mobile conservatives, they partition their friendships and amicability with 'those gays' from how they view the larger community or sociopolitical issue. They think they can be friends from John or Jo or Tom or Tammy or whoever at DAYS or GH and be good pals with those people, but still be for the Family Research Council and Chick Fil A or whatever else because now those 'special interest groups' are just 'going too far.' And that's too bad. I suspect that if I were ever to meet Missy Reeves she would have no problem with me personally. But she'll still support a bigoted company that doesn't believe I should be allowed basic inalienable citizen's rights. And she sees no disconnect between that - it's a micro and macro issue to people like that. And I'm disappointed by that, and I can't excuse it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And that's a huge problem. It's apathy at it's worst. Someone who smiles at you but really has no concern at all with what happens to you or how you feel. That is basically no respect for the person. It's disgusting to me. I'll be honest, I hate people like that. They are what is wrong with the world because they don't act to stop it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nelson Branco was going too far. Spewing hate to combat hate is not the answer. And the dumbasses who were tweeting to him without knowing where it started were just as bad. She said something to offend you okay you can tweet her your opinion once get your point across but there was no reason to be on the constant attack and with crap from years ago. And I find it vile her kids were getting attacked. Leave people's children out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've never ate at CF-A once. After hearing about these statements from their CEO, I won't be in the future. Bigotry in all it's forms is wrong. I just think, and have always thought, how truly stupid it is to be bigoted against anyone because of who they have a relationship with. If two guys were walking on the same side of the street but in different direction, how do i know that they may be gay or not? I don't. Many of these people who are on this kick about gay marriage should keep their noses out of someone else' home and bedroom, because they wouldn't like it if someone blasted what they do in the private lives all over the net. Live and let live. Leave folks alone. Damn.

But as for as she goes.....I have always thought she had an expression that looks like she was just surprised suddenly, because her mouth is always wide open and she looks surprised. I have NEVER gotten the opinion that she could act. Matt carried that couple. Her acting couldn't draw flies to crap, but if this is what she believe...at least now i know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you. I may not agree with her but I support her right to voice her opinion. And she never said she hated gays did she. I think Branco is the worst offender and example of folks on the opposite end of the spectrum and is as offensive as those on the opposite end. I hope folks don't side with him simply because he agrees with them because he also incites that which leads to hatred.

The president of CFA has a right to his opinion. Isn't that what this country is about. What bothers me is people who are hating on CFA for the most part aren't protesting because CFA donates to organizations that spew hatred and bigotry but because one person expressed an opinion that doesn't agree with their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. It's called empathy, which figures in highly in someone's emotional IQ. Unfortunately, there are too many people like Melissa who only see the world through their own set of experiences. They can't, or won't, reach outside themselves to think what it's like to walk in another person's shoes. A person who doesn't look or sound or act or believe what they do. Their world view: if only everyone was like me the world would be a beautiful place. It's a very naive, immature, narrow, self-centered view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What you're missing about CFA's president is: while he's entitled to his opinion about same sex marriage, what infuriates so many is his financial support of hate groups who say vile and untrue things about gays and lesbians. The man has given millions of dollars to these groups, which means if you eat at his restaurants, your money is going to support those hate groups as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not missing that in fact I said that in my post above. But the protests are not centered around that as strongly as they claim. If they were, CFA and their president have been supporting this organizations for years. Why are the protests just surfacing now? It's because he stated an opinion. Now why he did or why anyone cares what he thinks I have no clue. But I fully endorse folks protesting for the reasons stated, that just doesn't seem to be what incited folks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Interesting. Makes me wonder how the day to day looked for Secret Storm at this point in the run. This seems very to deal with the psychological aspect, I guess the "inner storm", and the music is almost sinister. If this is from 1974 there's not much room for dates it could've been from as it ended on February 8th.  It's hard to tell from an edit featuring just one storyline, but if this was the day to day it might've been heavy for the casual viewers.
    • Well, they were both involved with Ray Gardner.  Then, the actress left, only to return as a somewhat broader interpretation of the character after Dottie was SORASed.  By that time, Opal had left in 1983.  So, while they serve the same story function, one could argue that Edna was the carbon copy.
    • Okay, now it's my turn to ask about the Thorntons, namely Edna. Did she and Opal have any scenes together? I ask because I was familiar with Opal first, so when I found out about Edna, my biased mind saw her as the first try for that type of character.
    • There is no dispute that Jill Farren Phelps had a successful career in daytime based on longevity, but that does not preclude discussion and dislike of her decisions at various shows. Sure there may have been some misogyny involved BITD(we don't know as I don't recall JFP ever mentioning that) but the head of CBS Daytime at that point was a woman and there were other women involved BTS. I think that so long as an EP could deliver, or at least talk a good game they would be respected.  
    • It surprises/disappoints me too that GL's ratings during '89-'93 don't reflect the quality of the show. But when I call it great soap, I'm not defining that by ratings either.  I'm probably in the minority, but I think Reilly takes something intangible with him when he goes. There's a sense of humor that just disappears in '93. 
    • Ok, I know nothing about Another World except their catchy intro song from long ago, but this makes me want to catch!  That crazy mother keeping her son's girlfriend or wife hostage, wow! 
    • And maybe Hotel could have been placed at 9pm Tues instead of Paper Dolls. Not that I thing it was a surefire thing but at least viewers were familiar with the show and it might have done better than PD. ABC's line up was pretty threadbare at that point. And with a big guest star to launch the season - Elizabeth Taylor- the numbers would have been there initially.
    • Any fan of RuPaul would dispute calling any of these examples “drag”. A costume?, A disguise?, A lame attempt at humor? -- yes -- Drag? -- nope
    • No asterisk. I meant that the circumstances during the first year were in her favor.
    • Maybe I am misunderstanding you? Are you suggesting that her success at GL should have an asterisk next to it because she was smart enough to exploit a weakness in the marketplace to gain ratings?  Note: Try not to take this personally—I’m not accusing anyone of being consciously misogynistic. I’m simply proposing that the origins of certain ideas about Ms. Phelps—such as claims that she was unprepared or a poor manager of her writing staff—may be rooted in misogyny. Perhaps, with the benefit of hindsight, it's worth reconsidering those opinions. At the very least, imagine being one of the few women in the room while a male network executive tries to decide what women want to watch during the day. That context has certainly led me to reassess many of my own long-held views.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy