Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Members

While I disagree with your take on Sheffer as strenuously as I can, LOL, I acknowledge that tastes, perceptions and interests can (and do) vary significantly from person to person.

There have been films, television series, books and plays which were lauded by family members, friends and critics, but which turned me off completely.

There have also been films, television series, books and plays which I thoroughly loved and respected, which became some of my all-time favorites, while family members, friends and critics failed to find any merit in them whatsoever.

It boggled my mind to hear someone opine to me once that The Mary Tyler Moore Show was "boring and unfunny," but that Laverne and Shirley and Alf were "the best," and his favorite sitcoms of all time.

But...to each his own.

Probably the biggest challenge of any creative team looking to produce a mainstream hit is finding a way to appeal to the largest number of audience members, despite the to-be-expected, widely-varying opinions and tastes they will have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 16.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2887

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1703

  • P.J.

    805

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Don Chastain, referring to when he was writing SFT, once complained that the mandate from TPTB was always, "just copy whatever General Hospital is doing."

Executives are not necessarily creative people in any sense.  They are more apt to be "monkey see, monkey do" types, in the sense that if they believe a concept is working somewhere, they'll all jump on the bandwagon and drive that idea into the ground.

IMHO, that's why we've been burdened with the same tired gimmicks and mechanics on the soaps for the last several decades. They supposedly worked once, and everyone has been copying and using them ever since.

Yes, and yes. The bottom line is making money, no matter how unhealthy and damaging certain toxic conventions of today's soap operas are.

Rapemances have always turned my stomach, but since GH made rape a glorious fairy tale ("Rape me, Luke!") instead of the degenerate act of violence it actually is, soaps have shamelessly been using it to titillate viewers, despite the harmful message it sends both girls and boys in the audience.

Perfectly expressed, as always.

Soaps once had a moral compass. Making jokes about rape, and Craig have sex with the child he had raised, was just degenerate. And certainly not true to the "real" ATWT, which had been a huge rating success for so many years.

For the record, I found Frederick Bauer sleeping with the girl who had originally been raised as his sister to be quite skeezy as well. Papa Bauer would have boxed his ears!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for the tag as always @DRW50

I appreciate seeing the Kim/Susan scenes here a lot. I agree with the others it’s a criminally underrated rivalry with a long rich history, with of course a lot more to come, with only later fleeting moments like 2004 where boiled up again. 

I always loved the Barbara vs Shannon scenes too, just as epic in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Perfectly expressed, by both you and the legendary Irna Phillips.

To  me, Sheffer did not write the soaps in a way they were meant to be written; he wrote them in a destructive, modern-era fashion, a weak bastardization of the genre. Folks like Ron Carlivati are continuing on with that unfortunate practice today, and the soaps are worse off for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Randall Edwards recently let it slip the real reason Julie Ridley (Dr. Annie Stewart) exited As The World Turns. At the time fans and soap columnists were puzzled by her sudden exit. P&G simply said she was going to take two months off for personal reasons, so Randall Edwards took over temporarily. Then the change was permanent as Mary Lynn Blanks took over, and Julie Ridley never came back - the soap press saying she wanted to return to Atlanta

Fans have always wondered why Julie Ridley left so suddenly, never speaking to the media again and just disappeared. Now we know the reason why Julie Ridley left, as revealed by Randall Edwards in the new Ryan's Hope book - Julie Ridley was pregnant and not married.

It is not scandalous today - but back in 1982 being pregnant out of wedlock was considered a no-no. P&G being very conservative probably didn't approve of its leading lady being pregnant and not married. Irna Phillips wanted her character Kim to be a single mother, without getting married back in the day. P&G balked at that, which led to Irna Phillips getting sacked.

We don't know if it was P&G that asked her to leave, or it was Julie Ridley who wanted to leave. But that is the reason she left, she was pregnant. 

Edited by TheyStartedOnSoaps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for sharing this. 

It's unfortunate to hear of such Puritan views, although 1982 was still the years of the Moral Majority. 

I can't say Ridley's work has blown me away (more often it puts me to sleep like much of that era) but she had been in the part for several years and was probably the most known Annie. 

I'm confused as to why IMDB has her in a 1970 episode. Did she briefly play Annie as a child? 

Aside from visits, I think the closest would be late 1988, when Holden and Meg were leaving, and Caleb and Ellie were brought in. I can't remember if there was overlap. And Lisa Brown may have been on maternity leave at this point.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Over the last decade of being able to see various episodes from that era (because otherwise I have very sparse memories of the pre ‘83 years as I was too young to understand) on YouTube, I got a chance to see episodes with both actresses and I can only imagine how jarring it must have been to see the switch in real time. And to think, a few 3-4 years later, it likely wouldn’t have mattered that the actress was becoming a single mom IRL.

Ms. Irna Phillips was a very complex woman. Years ago, I did read about the battles that she and P&G had, including over the character and direction of Kimberly Sullivan. I realize that Phillips had the reputation of sometimes being something of a battle axe and I am in no way defending her treatment of Rosemary Prinz and Helen Wagner and others but when I read the book When Women Invented Television it was very clear that Phillips felt diminished by P&G, she felt that P&G didn’t believe in her and that she was constantly being undermined while feeling compelled to prove herself, over and over. I’m thinking that toward the end, it may have embittered her.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@All My Shadows @vetsoapfan I have to respectfully agree to disagree with both of you and Irna Phillips. I've never considered here the be all end all opinion on soap operas, legendary as she, indeed, is.

Edited to add @vetsoapfan that I agree in that anyone who says The Mary Tyler Moore show is "boring and unfunny" is immediately not to be trusted. LOL

Edited by adrnyc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy