Jump to content

Guiding Light discussion thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

A great end of the year gift! The last few minutes are missing but that's definitely nothing to complain about as this is one of those transition periods that we don't have much of. Two more episodes after this as well.

@Vee @dc11786 @Khan @SoapDope @soapfan770 @vetsoapfan @Khan @Mitch64 @Dan @Donna L. Bridges @slick jones @FrenchFan @Soapsuds @MichaelGL @jam6242

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Thank you @BoldRestless and @DRW50 for sharing these 1980 episodes.

1979 and 1980 episodes that feature Roger/Holly storylines are ones I look forward to because they set in motion everything we saw a decade later.

This is early in Douglas Marland run and he hasn't missed a beat from where the Dobsons left off, at least based on the episodes I've seen from 1979 and 1980.

From the 1980s ratings thread we saw that the Potter/Marland era held its own against pop culture phenomenon General Hospital but the cynic in me can't help but think that it was CBS's highest-rated soap only because Y&R was a mess from it's expansion until the first half of 1982. Remember prior to the expansion Y&R was challenging General Hospital for #1 but then the expansion, time slot changes, EP change, cast changes derailed all its momentum. Also notice Marland 1982 departure overlaps w/ Y&R getting back on track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In the Bill Bell book I am currently re-reading, I have just taken these notes. My paraphrase: Y&R expanded to an hour on Feb. 15, 1980. The show lost 4 share points. It took them 3 years to get them back. Everyone had been hired on contracts that stipulated a half hour show. No one was legally bound to stay. Some did new contracts. However, some left. They thought they could get some mileage out of the time they'd been on this new show. Specifically, Jamie Lyn Bauer let Bill know that she would work out the rest of her contract but then she was out. She would not sign a new contract. She told him she needed a break & she told him not to talk her out of it. The way he reacted to losing her was indirectly why & how he changed the families of the show. He didn't want to recast her & he couldn't bear to have her family & friends go on without her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I can suss out the weakness in the day to day scripts that plagued all of Marland's run shows (too much talking/exposition). but they appear not to be so noticeable in these March 1980 episodes... probably because Marland was carrying out the Dobson stories.

Killing off Diane Ballard was a boneheaded move of Marland's.  

Edited by Soaplovers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was an awful move - Diane was a spark plug character who could have easily fit into many parts of the canvas. Marland was a brilliant writer but he always (in my opinion) struggled with complex characters, aside from some terrific exceptions like Lucinda Walsh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

For me, the interesting possibilities for Diane are outweighed by the mystery and stories that came from her murder.  I think Marland's mystery writing skills are often underappreciated, and this is my favorite type of daytime drama.  Not only is the outcome surprising, but there were so many secrets attached to Diane that were exposed as part of the solution that it feels like a story that could only be told within the soap opera structure.  A two-hour movie could never utilize as much backstory without tons of inorganic exposition.  And a prime-time drama would need too many recaps for the audience to follow the plot on a week-to-week basis. 

So, I disagree with the critique of the story as an example of Douglas Marland's weakness. Because, I feel, it was a brilliant way to transition out of the stories of the previous writers and into his own concept for the show.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy