Jump to content

AMC: The Moving/Not Moving Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I've enjoyed Susan Lucci as much as the next person but if she decided to stay in NYC and leave AMC, it might be a good thing for both entities. I know we can all decry the death of the classic soap opera but it's a new era and I think it's been an hindrance to AMC to keep Lucci around but they can't outright fire her because it would be their death. Lucci has enough fans, enough connections, and enough money to do something else and AMC would be wise to snatch up a bunch of young talent, see what works, and reshape the soap as something younger and edgy. Yes, most of us probably wouldn't watch (I don't watch except for occasional glances at Stause's lovely rack--I am a male after all) but it may mean the survival for the soap. It doesn't surprise me the youth of the show are eager to move to L.A.--they may be able to make something for themselves in a younger AMC landscape not to mention in L.A.

I think when all is said and done, AMC will have a good mix of respected and loved vets and the new youthful characters that could help redefine the show (for better or for worse). Imagine AMC without a focus on Kendall, Zach, and Ryan? Imagine a show that doesn't have to try to painfully cram Erica into storylines that just don't do the character, Lucci, or the show justice? Sometimes change is good and this could mean brighter days for AMC. It can't get much lower/worse other than cancellation and this move signals to me that ABC is willing to try to make AMC work because entertainment--as with most things--is cyclical and all it takes is that one storyline; that one character; that one talked about moment to swing viewers back to soap operas. I think there's still a place for daytime soap operas, especially with prime soap operas springing up left and right and doing well (Grey's Anatomy, Ugly Betty, the rebirth of 90201, et. al.). What's missing from daytime is they're still playing to a conservative audience--an audience that gave up on daytime soap operas when gay storylines and interracial relationships became part of the norm. It's time to say good riddance to that archetype and to go modern without being brash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 672
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I couldnt agree more with everything you just said. Especially the part I bolded. I think this could be great for AMC. No cast member is bigger than the show (and at the risk of repeating myself), look at DAYS' recent rebirth. It's the only show up on this time last year and what have they done? Gone back to basics, dropped sensational gimmicks like explosions and tornados...focused on newbies tied to existing characters rather than over-relying on the vets. I think if Pratt really is going to turn AMC into a slice of Melrose Place in daytime (he's been heading that way for a while, it seems) then it could be just what the show needs to turn it around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just to be clear, DOOL is the success story of the year! But Days didn't become the "savior"...it did not feature the next Luke and Laura moment. All Days did was claw back some audience share, and hold on to it. I am not minimizing this. In a declining market, this is REMARKABLE.

But it was NOT "rebirth"...at least not from a commercial perspective. It was life extension, pure and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even if Melrose had a place in daytime, which I have big doubts on, nothing he has done at AMC is close to the best or even the mediocre of Melrose. The stories are a mess, the characters change direction at the drop of a hat, and most of them are almost impossible to care about. Pratt not only manages to do a bangup job of introducing new characters who are dead weight, he can't even sustain the few characters he once had a good grip on. What he's done to Annie is horrible to watch. Stories are started and then stopped too fast for viewers to be invested. So much pointless, gratuitous death -- Josh, Stuart, Greenlee (real or not).

His idea of Melrose in daytime seems to be hiring Jamie Luner and having her play a man-hungry dim bulb.

One of the reasons DAYS has improved is Gary Tomlin, who knows and loves the show, is there. There is no one like that at AMC now.

There's also nothing very daring or anti-conservative about the stories on AMC now. Women are obsessed with babies and men. Gays do not exist, unless they are turned straight or have a kid with their brother-in-law. The only story for black characters revolves around Randi the dead wood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know if I necessarily agree with everything you say. I think All My Children has always been a modern soap opera, reflecting the times and often ahead of its time.

The main problem is story. It just plain sucks. I've stuck with the show mainly because I have my favorite characters/actors and every once in a while they'll do something interesting or have some great one-liners that make me chuckle. These are the little nuggets that I take pleasure in and for me are a glimmer of hope for better, more consistent storytelling.

But in the state that the show is in right now, if you were to take away Erica, I'll stop watching because there is nothing left for me to enjoy. The only way the show would keep me as a viewer is if totally rocked in the story department and was the best damn written show on TV.

I just can't watch this show without Erica and I know eventually there is going to be a time where we will have to say goodbye to her. But for me, a poorly written show without Erica will be much easier to give up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Totally co-sign. There's no indication with what's been on-screen (at least before I stopped watching) that the move would somehow re-ignite the show. The writing has been silly and downright sloppy for a while now.

Plus, AMC is just not a Melrose-kind of show. It actually sort of tried to be that during the height of Fusion, and we all know how that worked out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Melrose Place is Melrose Place. Its plots moved on an weekly, primetime basis, which was streamlined and heightened in a way that daytime is not, by nature of its daily format and more layered, historical storytelling. I deeply loved MP, but it was a particular kind of show. Charles Pratt already tried to do his MP-style storytelling at GH, where suddenly all the women began to get in catfights every other day, calling each other "whore" or "slut" a la Amanda Woodward and Taylor McBride, with a heaping helping of sexual titillation (Faith kissing Courtney for no reason). This kind of hyperkinetic kitsch, heightened reality worked for Spelling soaps like Melrose Place, with a primetime episodic format, and the temporal compression of narrative time that requires. But the Pratt/Spelling house style applied to daytime looks like your grandma dressed up like Lil' Kim. On meth.

In a less harsh ratings climate, and with better writing, AMC could certainly survive without Zach, and probably Kendall. Today, with the ratings and writing being what they are, I have my doubts that it could handle losing Kendall. And any AMC without Erica is dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really don't see there being an official list being put out. Why would they? SOD is implying that negotiations will continue until the last minute (December) with some stars, so there must be some big names that have not said "yes" yet. They aren't going to put out a press release if they can't put Susan Lucci or David Canary or probably even Alicia Minshew's name on it.

I can't imagine that TPTB at AMC/ABC are running around right now trying to get a list together yelling "The fans! The fans! We must get this information out to our loyal fans right away!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy