Members King Posted September 7, 2006 Members Share Posted September 7, 2006 Isn't this what SOap Love Scenes do ANYWAY? I'll have to see it to see the big deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JER Soaps Fan Posted September 7, 2006 Members Share Posted September 7, 2006 I agree, KR, how can a love scene be so controversial? Unless...they really ARE committing a sexual act on camera...or at least a Cinemax one. This is so confusing! But it's the only solution, right? I mean, if Emily's not going to grab Galen's actual butt cheeks and, from behind him, we see her simulate oral sex, then I don't know what's going to happen. So that's what I'm banking on. Galen is stripping down and we'll see his whole nude backside while Emily simulates oral sex and grabs his butt cheeks. JUST like on Cinemax. My gosh, "Passions" IS daring!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Faer Posted September 8, 2006 Members Share Posted September 8, 2006 Why didn't anyone TELL MEEEEEE??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members SteveFrame Posted September 8, 2006 Members Share Posted September 8, 2006 JSF, the love scene doesn't have to have any action in this day and time to be controversial. And I don't remember him saying he was going to be controversial - just that he was going to push the limits. In this day and age the limits could just mean nudity. Any bit of nudity on network television since the Janet Jackson boob thing is a no no. The first show to push that button is going to get attention. But someone has got to be brave enough to do it again, or it will never be done. The primetime network shows have not done it. So why not a soap opera this time. I don't want porn on my shows (if I want porn I know where to get it) but I don't see anything wrong with some nudity or even some sex scenes like Nip/Tuck or Rescue Me do them. I wouldn't want it everyday and esp. since we have the TV rating system there is no reason why there can't be some kind of warning. I just hope Reilly pushing the limits will inspire some of the other soaps to do the same or even some other soaps. During family hour viewing I don't want to see it, but I don't have a problem with it at other times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Helena Posted September 8, 2006 Members Share Posted September 8, 2006 I don't understand why this show thinks all it has to offer is sex scenes. It gets so old and boring and gross after a while. It feels like every episode someone is shoving their tongue down someone else's throat, and now this? Is the audience supposed to be excited that JER finally decided to label what he writes as porn? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Toups Posted September 8, 2006 Administrator Share Posted September 8, 2006 Michael Logan labeled it "porn" not JER. All JER said was, "We're taking it as far as taste, and the network, will allow us........But if I had my druthers, the police would be raiding the set." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Helena Posted September 8, 2006 Members Share Posted September 8, 2006 Actually, that sounds worse than labelling it porn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Toups Posted September 8, 2006 Administrator Share Posted September 8, 2006 There's nothing wrong with porn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members R!ck Posted September 8, 2006 Members Share Posted September 8, 2006 Nothing can shock me after Brooke and Whipple's lovemaking session on B&B a few years ago. Brooke was laying in bed while Whipple was under the sheets. Her legs were swaying back and forth while you seen him under the sheets moving all the while she was moaning. And then there's the Bridget/Deacon scene in which we see Deacon rip off his shirt and began kissing and intensly having sex with her like a wild animal complete with moans, groans and up and down movements. After they were done he smoked a cigarette and Bridget told him his sex was amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bellcurve Posted September 8, 2006 Members Share Posted September 8, 2006 Reilly is SO 1995. Maybe this will finally get this mess of a show pulled by NBC. ETA: The only character remotely interesting anyway is Gwen. And Fancy too... Brooke and Whip consumated their marriage? I had NO idea! While we're on the subject of wild sex scenes, what about the "doggystyle" moment between Troy and Lindsey during OLTL's "Storm of Change?" That was actually hot and kind of racy for a daytime soap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KBT Posted September 8, 2006 Members Share Posted September 8, 2006 Where have you been hiding Tim, good to see ya posting! She even looks better in person, I wanted to grab her so bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JER Soaps Fan Posted September 8, 2006 Members Share Posted September 8, 2006 Dear God, will you all STOP teasing me already? Either point me to the screencaps of these hot, steamy, daytime [!@#$%^&*] scenes or please, shut up! lol. I hate having to visualize these scandalous scenes. Back it up with a SHOW!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bellcurve Posted September 8, 2006 Members Share Posted September 8, 2006 Use your imagination honey! Not everything needs referencing via YouTube. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JER Soaps Fan Posted September 8, 2006 Members Share Posted September 8, 2006 I'm sorry but I disagree; these scenes DO require visual proof for the stimuli. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bellcurve Posted September 8, 2006 Members Share Posted September 8, 2006 VISUAL PROOF? So you're saying I'm making it up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.