Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Peacock typically does lots of promo close to the start date of what they're promoting. I imagine that's the plan for Days as Errol mentioned a big promo campaign is coming. 

  • Replies 961
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted

My question is what does daytime TV become in the next 5 to 10 years? Certainly all news all day won't work. I hesitate to believe that broadcast TV will go extinct because we still have radio after all.

Posted

I keep thinking that broadcast TV, which has been on the decline as long as the soaps have, since the 80s, is going to fail. But I can't visualize what that looks like. And, I keep thinking that streaming is the future but they are having such awful growing pains. So much not to know, there is.

  • Members
Posted

This is not directed at you, Chris B. I get that Peacock will do promos. But what is NBC doing to help with the transition? There will be alot of lost viewers come Sept 12 because NBC is not even running a scroll across the bottom of the screen saying that Days will move to Peacock and you can sign up for $19.99 for the year. NBC could at least help out to let viewers know where and how to find Days after Sept 9. I'm being ageist here but you need more time to let the older viewers understand how to maneuver to Peacock. NBC has done nothing to help this along. They seem done with Days and are not doing anything to help the move to Peacock. 

Posted

When NBC canceled AW, they did nothing. I've met tons of fans who were not online then who are online now who literally were shocked when they tuned in the Monday after the Olympics & AW was from their perspective "just gone, vanished." I would bet the same things happened to offline fans of BEACH 6 months later. No idea about PSSN because it was more complicated, like this is, a move to DirecTV. It seems to me that NBC is one very rotten apple in this fruit basket and it is their blasted pattern to do nothing, zip, nada.

  • Webmaster
Posted

I’m actively working on getting those answers. This week interviews are happening with cast members on set and virtually. But I’m personally working on getting other aspects and perspectives on this transition from non-DAYS people. 

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Hard to believe, a 57 year old program is going to be ending its run on broadcast TV at the end of next week, not only with little fanfare, but also with a regular episode. They're not doing anything special, nor saying goodbye to their loyal TV audience. Really sad. 

I wonder, if their contract allows NBC to move the show to Peacock, does it have another clause that allows the show to move back to TV if Peacock fails? I doubt moving to Peacock is going to work out. The app itself doesn't seem to have that much of a future, given all the competition. NBC TV doesn't seem to have anything else on, and most TV stations were ok with the numbers DAYS was bringing in. It would be a miracle, but could there be a one in a million chance?

 

Edited by Jdee43
  • Members
Posted

My local NBC did mention when AW was cancelled that it was ending, so people who weren’t online would have found out from them. At least they did have a little time to plan goodbye on screen unlike Days. With days they did announce on the news. I figure they will run banners about new schedule if anything changes time slot,  but that is a local not national thing. 
 

errol looking forward to that report.

  • Members
Posted

Canadian SON members might recall that when AW was cancelled it was announced on the 6pm national news. The final week of episodes had a lot of promotion on Canadian television. I've never seen fanfare like that for a daytime show before or after.

The issue with what NBC has not done insofar as promotion goes is premised on the fact that DAYS is moving to Peacock...while I'm one of those bottom feeders (thanks, Ken Corday) who call it a soft cancellation (which it is), if there's any hope of DAYS attracting subscribers to Peacock, promotion is required - this should have started 60 days ago, not two weeks before D Day. 

  • Webmaster
Posted

Look for a big promotional push starting today, September 1. Don’t have specifics yet but there’s a reason today is kick off day. I’ll share more in the coming days. 
 

To be blunt, our frustrations on how this transition has been handled is shared with more people than you might think. Some might say the sky is blue in public but they are pissed!

Posted

Gosh, we used to have so many ways of zinging NBC. Began with the ubiquitous NBC Sucks which was often rendered in crossword fashion. Boycott NBC was big, as was doing at least 2 yrs without NBC. Ended up something clever with a fan or fans blowing letters & student ... something. Too bad.

  • Members
Posted

Agreed. AMC and OLTL had much more fanfare at the end of their runs. they had fantastic sendoff episodes on The View. As for CBS,  I at least saw clips online of The Early Show covering TGL and ATWT's finalies.  This just feels way too low-key.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You know what's crazy? Even though JFP ultimately has been a disaster at many soaps, and even though all the negatives about her are true, I'd still prefer her over Josh Griffith at Y&R. She can take over for him anytime, and I will applaud.
    • The baby was named when Roman was believed to be her father.
    • I gotta agree with Sami on this one. -- thanks @Franko for the source, that's a good find. I mean, not enough to sell the kid on the black market (pun intended) but.. At least it wasn't John who suggested it, that makes it cleaner.  Roman had naming rights until the christening cleared up the paternity.
    • Yea, at that time many people were complaining about replacing vet middle aged women with new character middle aged women...like Rauch and writers just ran out of ideas on how to write for anyone but that old bag Reva (sorry, loved Kimmer in her prime, but never understood why the ageist misogynist Rauch and Company made her goddess of love when her expiration date was long past...) We got Selena over Nola (but really so he could fire Fiona for their Zaz vendetta) and Carmen over Van.  But both Van and Nola got the last laugh, Van's wedding centering the last episodes and Nola returning for it and throwing a quick diss to the Coopers.     
    • The Dalton story reeks of 10 rewrites.
    • Belle is indeed named after Isabella. It was Roman's idea. Courtesy the Oct. 22, 1993 synopsis found on Jason's site: "Roman suggests to Marlena that they call the baby Isabella and Marlena agrees. Sami isn't too happy when she overhears it but when they ask John he loves the idea. They toast to Isabella Brady."
    • Engaging for a moment with the topic with titan, Jill is a skilled line producer who maneuvered herself well and leveraged key veterans at various shows for maximized award potential even with lousy stories or taste. But she's never been the creative she fancied herself to be without talented writers behind her, and as an OLTL fan it was fitting to see her knocked down in power and influence after she nearly destroyed GH, the ABC flagship, in under a year when left to her own devices. (Megan McTavish may be insane but her comments about Jill and having to grudgingly write in Kale Browne three days a week at her behest were funny.) Like a lot of the industry she's got certain skills, but she also has a faded bag of tricks that has been mouldering since 1992. Which is a part of why it was such a hoot to see Jill appear out of the shadows like a leviathan in that video. Of course she's at it again. Who will be the next blonde white chick named Courtney in 2026? Riveting stuff for Gen Z.
    • Kat vs Eva is so complex because this feud goes beyond the typical 'good sister/bad sister' trope employed on soaps.  And the gist of the feud goes back to their father with Kat so insecure over not being the only daughter that she's going to lengths even Eva wouldn't go to in order to remove her sister. Kat is just like her aunt Dani in this regards (i.e. going too far even if in the right).
    • Just to confirm, Belle isn't named for Isabella Toscano, correct?  It would be nuts for John to name his daughter after his dead wife, after he wound up with Marlena, right? For example, I would think it uncouth if Joe Biden named a child he had with Jill Biden, after his first wife Neilia, who died tragically.

      Please register in order to view this content

      I was reading her wiki, when the thought came to mind.  But, I also have a vague memory that Belle was named after Beauty and the Beast's Belle, or some other lore. And Rachel's named after Kristen's mother, so this seems wrong.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy