Jump to content

GH: Actor sues over mandate!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Funny as Hell that the Supreme Court has not ruled as of today 5 times against lawsuits against mandates.  So Mr. Trumper Ingo, you are sh^# out of luck.   Burned and tore down the bridge, he'll NEVER be back as Jax now for sure.  I say either kill Jax off, or get a great re-cast who is a pro-vaxer anti Trumper!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Im not shocked he found a law firm to help him sue, but that is his reason for religious exemptions? And ABC DIsney denying THAT is Religious discrimination?

 

Get over yourself Ingo. This case is TOAST

Edited by John
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh how I hollered at work when I saw this post.

 

I mean really, Ingo?

 

Please register in order to view this content

 

It makes me wonder if that is why they gave Jax a nothingburger exit rather than the 'killed by mob hit' exit that it appeared to be heading in with him. Because they sensed this would happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is very simple: as a Christian there is no *religious* doctrinal reason to refuse a vaccine. That's what a religious exemption is: when you HAVE to refuse a vaccine because of something their religion teaches. 
So a Christian scientist can ask a religious exemption. Because refusing modern medicine is something they believe in.

But there is no strand of mainstream Christianity whose teachings require its followers to refuse a vaccine. They may not mandate it either but a religious exemption is not a free get-out-of-jail card to not do what you don't want to do.
Even anti-vaccine pastors do not claim it is Biblically-mandate to refuse vaccines - since they have been taking other vaccines without issue. They simply say you should not want it because reason A, B or C.
That's not religious; that's opinion and there is no political opinion  exemption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • BLQ is having second thoughts regarding putting her baby up for adoption. Chase is upset he can't tell Dante. So both are putting this on at lulus feet. Saying she is holding it over them. Lulu is doing none of this. 
    • Yes she absolutely was involved in that story which seems to have gone nowhere.  She didn't start to remove herself from the writing until 1973.
    • Y'all are bringing back great memories of AMC 2.0 for me.  I haven't thought about it and the new characters in so long, well since it aired, and I plan to go re-watch it now. When AMC ended, I finally came to peace with it and accepted that I will never watch an hour of a TV show daily in my life again... something that I had been doing since I was 6-7 years old. I was starting a new career, relationship, and chapter in life when AMC 2.0 came out.  I found a way to watch it, but things felt differently for me at the time and when it was so short-lived and gone, it became such a distant memory, sadly.
    • That's a great point. I wish the writing could find those nuances.
    • After all Lulu's been through with her coma and missing years I can get her being on the sensitive side especially when talking to her mother.  I was thinking it was more a culmination of everything than just this one particular problem. 
    • I see her moral dilemma, too, and I don't think Lulu was out of line. I just felt it was overboard for her to break down in tears over her dilemma.
    • I also think the fact Lulu chose abortion and Brook Lynn chose to give a baby up for adoption instead when they were in similar situations adds another layer to this.  The writing doesn't really state this, but I can see Lulu slightly spiraling about thinking she could have an adult child out there if she made a different choice.  Both woman made the right choices for themselves at the time, but I can see both making parallels to their decisions.
    • SO good!  I agree. Classic soap opera and it was a cliffhanger I've been craving for weeks now.  First time in a while that I can't wait for tomorrow's episode!
    • -- I was OK with the music. I think the first 5 minutes of the first episode spoiled us -- we really thought we were going to get "real music" a lot more often. Instead, we got some budget money for the opening scene, and that was it. -- I'd like music to be used more often, but I'll put that on production and not on the musicc supervisor. I think they've intentionally dialed down the music on this show. -- Editing? I still have major problems with it. This episode was SO good, but almost every fade to commercial was off or bad. I just don't get it. That, too, is intentional, but I have no idea what they're going for. It isn't working.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy