Jump to content

GH August 2020 Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I’m glad COVID isn’t a part of GH storylines. It wouldn’t be done properly, so why do it? You really think they’d wear masks at appropriate times? They wouldn’t. Then you’d expect explanations about that. I just don’t want to see that part of real life on the soaps. This is all hard enough to get through without COVID soaps.

 

i thought the Nurses Ball looked cheap as hell. Those t shirts looked wrinkled and not really high quality. Everything was underwhelming.

 

Part of the problem was just replaying past Nurses Balls for weeks. We needed another one this soon? One that’s a lesser version of itself? Just no.

 

KeMo looks to me like she got new botoxed lips and that it caused an infection. I thought she looked awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly.

 

If it’s not going to be done right, then it’s not worth doing at all. And now that you mention it, after dealing with it for all these months, I wouldn’t want to see it on TV either, especially on soaps.

Edited by AbcNbc247
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If you're not going to do it, then do a fictional pandemic! But don't act like people are tuning in for these terrible stories when they could've done a timejump. Do something new! I'm not here to watch these folks risk their lives breathing the same air as Kelly Monaco and wearing ill-fitting t-shirts (poor Bradford)

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why bother with this fictional telethon? It might’ve been cool at least it they actually connected this with some kind of real-life fundraising effort, even if they didn’t name COVID as the reason. Otherwise, it’s not compelling at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This Nurses Ball is so dead boring. Not that any of the modern era Balls have been that great. The telethon wasn't a bad idea. But it so badly done. Only 2 musical numbers so far. The kids were way better than Nina & Jax. Poor Anna propping up her insta son Parking lot Pete. Poor Robert stuck with Spinelli.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Gotta say, William Lipton was quite a find for GH. The kid is very talented and I think he's got the potential to be a leading man in the future.

 

I'm going to feel so bad for Anna and Maxie when their Peter bubble gets burst. 

 

And Brook Kerr still looks amazing. Seriously, did she leave Passions 13 years ago or 13 days ago? She looks exactly the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed. They could have time jumped to August and just came out of a small pandemic that lasted 3 months. That way you can cut stories not working. 

 

It's still May 2020 in PC right?

Edited by John
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Much like Oscar dying, I do not understand a creative team that is so invested in such a depressing storyline (Mike’s declining health) will then turn around and say their audience is looking for an escape from the real world.  And this is what you think we want to see?

 

Also-  the weird starts and stops to stories has got to stop.  Why things like Mike dying and Peter are dragged on for months or even years, but other things are just dropped or given no time (Molly and TJ, Brando, Dev, Nikolas, Liz’s kid/money issues), is strange.

Edited by titan1978
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With its overstuffed canvas, GH really feels like a scattershot attempt to be all things to all people and winds up disappointing everyone. Nothing really feels developed. It feels like a stubborn attempt to produce a big 20th-century soap with 21st-century limitations. It just doesn’t work at all for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's the big storylines with non-contract characters that are messing up the show the most. Where the hell are Brad and Lucas? They really needed to further include them. Maybe bring in a new man for Lucas and have Brad trying his best to get Lucas back, but at the same time Brad begins to remember his feelings for Felix.

 

I'm sure the same thing's going to happen with Molly and TJ once TJ finds out that she slept with Brando. They'll have their big confrontations scenes and then just disappear.

Edited by AbcNbc247
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/shortland-street-fears-speculation-grows-about-shows-future-amid-industry-struggles/T2GECWXTI5AD3AMEV46YYYUE6E/ Still a big cloud over whether the show will get another year.
    • I had hoped they'd pair her with Michael Knight. They had a nice chemistry and he's been one of the better random castings on GH. When it comes to Gio, I found the scenes with Dante to be overdone. It's obvious they're trying to set up conflict for the reveal but I don't think that was needed. It actually made me less excited for the reveal and killed any interest I had in Dante and Gio forming a bond.
    • He also lost the woman he was going to marry, under very sudden circumstances. They are probably surprised Rena has wanted to stay. I think Lois works OK in her current capacity, if they allowed her to have more of a point of view, a bit more life of her own, and not just the reason for Gio's paternity being hidden. The character always felt very thin to me and on paper this dynamic with Tracy, Brook Lyn, Gio, visits from Gloria could be better for her than how overly centered she was on the canvas the first time around. But as of now she could be better used.  Somehow the show that was revived due to supercouples seems completely alien to romance. The older cast has this hardest but even with tiers who are younger or middle-aged, they've really dragged their feet about Liz and Lucky, they have contorted themselves in trying to figure out how to pair a man with Joss, Kai and Trina barely get focus...and others I struggle to remember. They also blew up Sasha/Cody so now I guess we're meant to be waiting to see if she finds true love with Jason? The show is so hesitant and when you are this hesitant it means you are incapable of writing romance.
    • I agree.  Rena doesn't seem to mind the lighter workload and seems happy though. Strangely, a lot of the veteran cast are without viable love interests-Sonny, Nina, Lois, Jason, Tracy, Alexis, Carly (Brennan doesn't count).  The show lacks serious interest in romance.
    • I just can't wait until next week when we can go back to a full weeks worth of episodes. 3 episodes and a mid-week gap has been so difficult to deal with, especially in light of how good the show is.
    • I always hoped they'd change Parker's paternity back to Phillip.  I guess it doesn't matter since Chloe is off the show currently.  I don't recall Holly or Maggie mentioning Parker, so it's not they are close to him. 
    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but certain problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, early 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy