Jump to content

Too Young To Be That Kids Parents


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Please tell me again how SORAS is necessary lol I know that not all of these are due to SORAS, but still.

Barbara Bel Geddes was only 9 years older than onscreen son Larry Hagman.

Helen Wagner didn't have many years on her onscreen children on ATWT. Twelve years older than Rosemary Prinz, sixteen years older than Don Hastings, and she was entirely too young to play mother to most of the actors who played Donald:

Hal Studer (1956) - five years younger than HW
Richard Holland (1956-1962) - four years younger than HW
James Noble (1962) - four years younger than HW
Peter Brandon (1965-1972) - eight years younger than HW
Martin West (1976-1978) - nineteen years younger than HW
Conard Fowkes (1978-1981) - fifteen years younger than HW

In the original story bible, Don was "in his senior year of high school" lol They finally got it right in the 70s, but still, if you think that a focus on hiring younger actress over older actress began in the 80s, you're wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

 

Haha that’s true and a good point. It’s also a reason I’ve never understood why people in their late 20’s get hired on to play teenagers. Gabrielle Cateris on 90210 and Blair Redford on The Lying Game are prime examples of this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ATWT

Eileen Fulton (Lisa) was born in 1933

Don Hastings (Bob) was born in 1934

 

Their onscreen son Tom born 1961

Once SORASED played by these actors

Peter Link born 1944

Peter Galman born 1944

C David Colson 1941

Ton Tammi born 1945

Justin Deas born 1948

Jason Kincaid born 1952

Gregg Marx born 1955

Scott Holes born 1952

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They at least tried to make the math work. I think he was supposed to be 16-17, which was pretty close to what his actual age should have been.  He didn’t look a day younger than 18, but he was supposed to be high school aged.

 

Lucky was a little aged up too.  But viewers had a decade of not seeing them so it was not a jarring situation.


Pretty typical Hollywood sexism though for all these women to be so close in age to the actors hired to be their kids.

 

Edited by titan1978
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They really seem more like a big brother and sister.

 

What fun McKinsey must have had as Iris though.  And the fight between Mac and Rachel at the end was pretty fantastic.

They really did!  The show had Laura often looking downright frumpy.  Right before Lucky died they bought her all these new cloths, did a bunch of photo shoots,  and she had a really flattering haircut with bangs that reminded me that Laura is not in the same age range as Monica.  It was a welcome change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think there's a story to tell in someone who always believed in honesty and integrity being emmeshed in so many lies, but I agree that it wasn't very well laid out over the last few months. I think if I was more invested in Lois, I would have more of an issue than I do. Few can hold up against Jane. This is one of those cases where I think mentioning who already switched babies or have long-lost children would just take away from the fallout. If Lulu wants to drag Brook Lyn for hypocrisy there is probably still time (if the show bothers). I don't think anyone would claim these are the best GH episodes ever. It may be very lowered expectations at play. But I do think that scenes like yesterdays were some of Tracy's best, as she is a character who is often not allowed that type of moment.
    • You would think that, wouldn't you? I'd almost think they needed the money to get Robert Newman back, but they also had to know Larkin wasn't going to stick around and play second banana either. I don't get what the writers thought they were doing with Calla. Long liked using actors from Texas, but other than Alex/Bev McKinsey, the characters she wrote for them seemed blah.
    • Bo has a bad history with kids named Zach. (too soon?)
    • Christie said in her interview this week that she recently started taking acting classes again, and has been doing some work in England, so that helped her to jump into Carrie for this (as well as it being all so familiar, it really was home.)
    • Andrea Barber aka Kimmy Gibbler did have a few scenes with Drake too, when he first came on. Christie came in the middle of that storyline 
    • Carrie, as played by Andrea Barber, was at Bo & Hope's wedding. She was the flower girl. The ringbearer was Zachary Parker, the little boy that Megan tried to pass off as her and Bo's son. Andrea's Carrie was at Tony & Anna's real wedding (Aug. 5, 1985). She appeared for the last time on March 21, 1986. Christie's Carrie debuted on April 14, 1986. It appears that Carrie remained in Salem, just off-screen, during that near-month. Christie picked up with what Andrea had been playing, apprehension over John.
    • I don't think she is. I think she just created some really boring characters and for some reason doesn't know what to do with them.  But let's say that she is being force to write these characters that she doesn't like or want to write for.......that's a really bad sign that the creator of the show is being told what to do from the very beginning.  With so many EPs, I was worried there could be too many cooks in the kitchen, too many people giving notes - all those EPs are representing companies who have a stake in the show.    Canada continues to be one episode ahead. Thursday's US episode is another lacklustre episode, even with Leslie in it.  We'll see if Friday or Monday's episode in Canada will be a repeat. 
    • Like a lot of soaps, once relatives left, they kinda dropped off the face of the earth and out of conversations. I don't know why writers do that. If they just don't want to confuse viewers, or don't think it matters, or want the liberty kind of revise history to make their stories work. After Josh left in '84, he's barely mentioned. Even when Billy's railing against Kyle and refusing to accept him, it'd be the most natural thing in the world to say "Kyle's NOT by brother, JOSH is!" and I don't think he ever really says that.  The only writer I can recall who didn't do that is Doug Marland on ATWT. 
    • IIRC, there is a line during this time period where Reva says something like Marah is her first-born child, which fans were not thrilled with.  Dylan makes a few appearances through the rest of the show (and a much later recast that isn't really worth talking about, with a face that is familiar to you). He will make one briefly during 1997, if you get that far.
    • Another great episode.  GH has been pretty good this year, loading up the chamber, because now there's many bullets to fire, and another one was fired today when Nina found out Michael is the father of Sasha's baby.  I hope this secret comes out at the hearing.  I've also liked the slow burn with Gio/Emma. There's just so many things to look forward to on this show now.  GH is finally back to being really good. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy