Jump to content

Soaps In The Time of Crisis


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 189
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Hot take: Not only should GH do an AMC/OLTL 2.0-style time jump and use this opportunity to cut much of the cast and revamp, they should also consider doing podcasted serialized/limited stories via ABC - a viral outbreak story, like some of their best, going back to Lassa Fever. We're going back to GL basics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is going to be really, really bad. I could see soaps not being in production till the summer in the best case scenario. When it  slows down finally  in the LA area, it will probably feel like a massive earthquake hit them. Who knows how long it will take the area to recover and for TV shows to be ok to go back into production. 

 

ETA: It wouldn't surprise me if the start of the traditional  fall season is pushed back this year. Shows won't premiere till early next year and will have shortened seasons. 

Edited by dawn9476
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Who'd have thought DAYS insane production schedule actually works in its favor now? Just bonkers. It's too bad the other 3 can't go on a 3 or 4 day cycle - like have Thursday/Fridays as a 'classic.' Didn't GL do non-storyline episodes on Wednesdays near the end? It's probably not feasible to run repeats with new at this point. I assume we'll get a combo of news specials/repeats when they run out of episodes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GL did Wed eps that focused on a particular character or storyline. I assume this was done for economic reason - I guess they used fewer actors and sets.

 

If soaps went M-W-F with new eps and Tues/Thurs with reruns?

Would it be feasible to have special episodes that focused on a particular character/story eg Lily/Devon talk about their lives and there are flashbacks. So basically the two actors would be on a set and tape 10 mins or so of wraparound with flashbacks filling in the rest. That would take the place of straight reruns.

Would that be more appealing to viewers?

That would give them a few more weeks of shows to air.

Edited by Paul Raven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@Paul Raven That's so funny. I came back to edit my post to suggest the wrap-around episodes you mentioned. All 3 soaps have so many true vets with multiple storylines, that it could work. ITA - I think that would be kinda interesting. I gathered people have liked the 'tribute' episodes that Y&R has done.  If they can do it, it would be cheap and better than just a pure repeat with a bunch of irrelevant portions of storylines. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Webmaster

 

Personally, I've long been a fan of airing soaps on a reduced schedule to better keep up with the ever changing entertainment landscape and allowing for daytime to have the ability to air more diverse programming like what is done in primetime. My long held idea is to have the current crop of soaps air Monday through Wednesday, and have a rotation of new shows air on Thursdays and/or Fridays. This can include once a week type fare or a multitude of shows, including dramas, not currently on air. This way we can have the ability to binge watch the soaps at a reduced rate so that they don't lose our attention to something less attention grabbing (meaning the soaps requiring too much of our time).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm of the mind that soaps should have reduced their schedules a long time ago to fit with reduced audiences. One soap doing three episodes a week and another doing two would be much more sensible considering that there is so much filler with five episodes week. Not to mention it would cut the budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What happens to the soap mags with nothing to cover? Is it just going to be wall-to-wall Days coverage? That can't be sustainable. This seems like it'll signal the end for them, they were on their last legs anyway unfortunately. How sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Does daytime lend itself to a variable primetime-like schedule? Curious if there are good examples of that thriving anywhere outside of cable. I suppose the networks could try, but I think there are really good reasons why daytime programming is stripped.

 

The last thing soaps need right now is its remaining casual audience forming other habits while shows are off the air. A long delay could be fatal for the genre.

Edited by Faulkner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Considering it's a given that they won't be back into production anytime soon, they need to at least limit the amount of episodes per week. I know in the UK they're cutting down on some of their soaps to stretch the episodes. Strangely enough, Emmerdale which airs SIX episodes a week isn't slowing down (nor are they stopping filming). I think 2-3 episodes a week would be fine to keep them going. The alternative of them running out of episodes and just pulling them is risky considering there is no time table for a return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It will be interesting to see how this pandemic will affect the writing. IF the soaps come back from the break, how will dialogue & storylines have to change?

 

Were the characters quarantine as well?

 

Will the actors be willing to engage in physical contact with their fellow cast members that quickly?

 

Will we see an increase in sci-fi, medical storylines?

 

Food for thought while we wait for this thing to pass...

Edited by Aback
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think Jason might've posted some numbers for the syndication a while ago and the numbers for Falcon Crest was horrible. Like 1.5 rating or something, which was terrible.    ETA: it was actually Paul Raven:   New to syndication 60 min Fall Guy 67 markets 3.1/8 Falcon Crest 110 markets 1.1/5 To get into the top 40, you needed a 4.6/9 rating for reference - and Falcon Crest managed to get into a lot of markets to begin with. In the fall of 1985 Dynasty, Dallas and Knots were syndicated (show / rating / share / coverage % / markets): Dallas 3.4 10 51.7 92 Dynasty 3.4 10 48.7 47  Knots Landing 3.3 10 12.5 20  So, Knots as an example trippled Falcon Crest's rating with 20 markets - I'm sure those were major ones but it just goes to show you how much Falcon Crest bombed in syndication. 
    • It's not bad but the stories move too slow. It's the same problem when Dan O'Connor was CO-HW with Van Etten, they have a million stories and they all drag on endlessly with no resolution. I'd argue the majority of the stories airing now are good but you get sick of waiting months for something to happen.
    • Thanks. I must have missed that period entirely for Lifetime. 
    • Thanks. I know Marland did that type of thing sometimes but it's less likely with these characters. I don't even remember Alex ever mentioning him.
    • French fan summary Rusty took over Simon's job at Lewis Trucking after Simon transferred to Lewis Oil's North Carolina office to live near Jessie and Calla. I doubt they would bother following up a story for offscreen characters eg marriage and a baby.
    • I suspected that the performance with the reveal was the reason why the Ted actor got the axe and it looks like I was right. He wasn't really good at conveying what needed to be conveyed in those scenes. Claybon is at least slowly improving (but I agree that he still needs to work on his line delivery), but I do wonder what will happen when his big reveal is coming up. 
    • I've already asked this before, recently, but can anyone who watched those years more closely tell me if anything said about Jessie and Simon at the end of their profiles is accurate (about them marrying, naming a baby after Brandon/Lujack, etc.)?
    • Nicole is way too smart to not know she was carrying twins - she's a doctor! My guess is that Leslie did abort her baby out of fear, and as payback, stole Ted and Nicole's child (Eva), and stole Kat from another family to replace her in the hospital.
    • Those Soap Central profiles have a lot of incorrect info. According to SOD summaries and the Daytime Newsletter of the time,Tim left town for a new job and Pam reunited with the father of her baby and also departed Springfield.They did not marry.
    • Do we believe that Jabot is at the level of Estee Lauder?? I am on board with Jabot deciding to expand but the way it was handled was ridiculous. Jabot just decided and bingo, that was that. Not months of negotiations and decisions about how it would fit into the Jabot portfolio. And then no follow through. Josh thinks he's serving business stories by characters sitting around and discussing mergers, takeovers and job switching. Now we have Audra setting up her own company -Vibrator or something. Well, why not? You don't need staff, office space or even products.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy