Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Okay, we'll take the word deserve off the table. The biggest thing about soaps then & soaps now is the issue of creative aesthetics versus the issue of economic aesthetics. We don't have auteurs any more -- and we won't be having them. @DramatistDreamer we live in a world where soaps just plain were better before the 2000s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 185
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator

@Khan, you don't even know what their relationship was like.  Who are you to say he wasn't good to her?  I just found that kind of disrespectful. 

 

Putting what he wrote aside, he seemed to be a good man who made people laugh - as evidence by what his former colleagues have posted about him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 

No, but even Martha is entitled to her rose-colored glasses.

 

I think what Martha meant was that Hogan was behind the decision to make Rose a twin. (Stupid as that was-----RME...) Not that he created the entire story. I thought I heard that "honor" went to Goutman, who wanted a way to "utilize" Martha's "sense of humor"...…  IMO, the only good moment in the entire story was Holden's reaction to Rose's true, nasal Jersey accent.

 

I think Sheffer was more valuable as an attention getter. At least he tried breaking the image that ATWT was "your granny's soap." I don't think he really had any "new approach" to the craft. I always admired the scriptwriters more (with some exceptions...ugh, the name Lynn Martin still makes me cringe...) with keeping the characters unique and somewhat consistent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

RIP to him. Regardless of opinions of his work, he no doubt had very strong working relationships with the cast and crew at ATWT, and my heart goes out to them. Every death of a soap personality is sad - we've gotten accustomed to our shows ending, but it's hard to accept that the community is getting smaller as the people pass away, especially those who were very active in the genre just five or ten years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have trouble remembering who wrote what but I do remember his writing was very uneven. Things were either excellent or horrible with not much in between. I am probably in the minority with this opinion and I’m not even sure he wrote it but, if he did, my favorite storyline of his was the Rose murder mystery. It got rid of of Rose, which was a plus for me, but I loved that he made Will the killer. Most whodunnits on soaps are big letdowns because the killer is always some background, disposable character. Never a main character, never a member of a main family and never a kid. Sheffer broke all three of those “rules”. It was a great mystery with a good, and shocking payoff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yes, that was him, and ITA with this (Lol and agreed about the getting rid of Rose part.) This may have been the last time the show was consistently good to me. Another rule he broke was that Rose died believing Paul had done it. That’s dark. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Something I am curious about & it is entirely possible that someone is sitting here who knows the answer: Why did Sheffer switch from CCulliton to Passanante? And other switches he made then, too? He had a working combination that was winning Emmys. Seems to me that is stupid to shuffle the deck?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Carolyn Culliton left or was switched by P&G over to GL to help Millee Taggert as her Co-HW. She landed at GL almost as soon as she left the ATWT credits. 

 

Though, I think the real dip in quality was when MADD forced them to fire some very talented male writers in order to inject more women on the writing staff. In 2001-2002, they lost writers like Stephen Demorest, Hal Corley, Jeff Beldner, etc and that did have an impact on the day to day writing and those writers were very good. Though, it was Loraine Broderick and Leah Laiman who brought many of those writers with them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow.

 

I knew very little about ATWT before Hogan started on it. I thought it was interesting that the companies were giving a newbie a change. That gave me hope in my wannabe soap opera writer days. 

 

I remember that he was trying to be diverse in writing. There was action. Drama. Comedy...even if I didn't like it. Gothic. Diversity was around. I loved Carly. I was sad about Bryant...so much potential. I was a Rose and Paul fan. I did like the spa storyline, I even remember the 'did you understand that' promo for it and thought it was so clever as a way to write out the three ladies.

 

I had stopped watching DAYS when he came around. And I loved his run for the first six months until the Sami/EJ rape. Just nope.

 

I remember when I was a lurker here that everyone discussed that he, Maria, and Scott seem to write like a committee on Y&R. There were months (or was it every three weeks) where it felt like Hogan writing. Then it would feel like Maria for a bit. Then we would get a mystery a la Scott. Did that ever get confirm? Wasn't my favorite, but I don't hate it nearly as much as others.

 

R.I.P. and thanks for the memories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Elliot is SOOOOO tasty in this period. He's so wicked. One of the reasons I stayed on with the show when I began watching. 
    • I can get through another 10 to 20 episodes. April is such a compelling character. The actress just owns the screen. I think this is also why I'm annoyed by Draper. Margo and April are so fantastic that Draper is a wet blanket (except for one scene which I mention below).   Draper was bearable in his scenes with Logan because he was not whining about the house. If he has more scenes with Logan, I can tolerate him. As of now, he's just very one note. Everyone has had more to do.  Thank you for explaining about Raven's backstory and her connection to Draper. It clears things up. Logan explained things a bit in the convo with Draper, but there was still some things I was not sure of. Gabet and Kibbee are just sensational. I now see why people adore Sharon Gabet. How did AW squander her talents? SMH.  It's the way Draper is written. I'm drawn to Eliot who is a total cheating pig. The writing and the performance are first-rate. Draper is stomping around like a spoiled child and I don't have the benefit of seeing April and Draper's relationship from the beginning so this is my first intro to Draper. He's annoying as can be. ========== There's also an African-American police officer who's struggling to walk again. He's Steve's partner. He took his first steps. I can't tell if they are writing him off or if he's going to say. I hope he stays because the actor is quite charismatic.
    • Oh no!  Did you not like the Susan character? She intrigued me from that one episode I skimmed through. What didn't you like about her?
    • The eternal dream...him begging to get with her included. 
    • On the other hand, I still find episodes of TV with people smoking in front of babies shocks me into nervous giggles.
    • Word of advice... you have to view the show without the 2025 lenses.. which means you need to 86 the misandry.
    • i love reading other posters alternate takes and scenarios. Yours would have really upped the tension.
    • Amanda is not my cup of tea. That's all I'm gonna say. She's repetitive and childish. She acts like a brat with her parents and has this constant "I'm not satisfied or happy" look on her face. The actress is okay in my opinion. I'm not impressed by anything I've seen her do so far. But she's okay.  BUT Amanda's repetitive scenes with Sam are the ones that I want to fast-forward the most. They just have 2  topics they like to talk about... and it's always "You are infringing on my right to be a powerful career woman! I need to be outside dating men for a job, so I can WORK and prove I'M NOT A RICH GIRL ONLY!" and he's like "You and your family are buying me a career and I don't want it! I WANT TO BE ABLE TO STRUGGLE and be poor and you guys ARE denying me the opportunity by giving it all on a silver platter" This is their main storyline for me... and it's just annoying when it's the same every single episode. It's a fake struggle that I don't buy. These people are so spoiled by this point and have everything... don't make me suffer listening to them bicker how amazing their life is, so they are unhappy about that. Just a personal view. I'm not saying THIS IS the situation. My view is also restricted, since I'm only 4-5 months into the episodes. 
    • It's shocking to see Steffy look down on anyone. She was the new generation HO for years. I mean... she was nasty and using sex to seduce married-engaged-in-relationship-men all the time. She was embracing it fully. Bradley was accenting on the fact that Taylor's daughter had become Brooke 2. I remember how disgusting it was when she was using Hope's virginity to her advantage and offering to f-ck the guys that wanted Hope. It was ABSURDLY nasty.  Then couple of years ago Bradley decided we should forget about it and made Steffy BECOME her grandmother. IN AN INSTANT. There was no build up to it. Which aged the f-ck out the character and made her unbearable. Because it's one thing to see an actual matriarch, older woman doing these things, being a moral judge... but it's complete joke to see the ex-ho acting like this. Ex-ho that is still incredibly young and has no right acting like she is better that anyone or... a moral JUDGE. Steffy and Hope's personalities got swapped!!! That's the irony of it. So any time these gang-style of fans come attacking Hope... for acting like a "slut"... I pinch myself - their HEROINE Steffy was doing this HARCORE. Are these people oblivious or just pretending not to remember. How can you stan a moral judge... that attacks "sluts" and also stan the same type of behavior you are attacking... years ago. How does this happen. But I repeat myself at this point.  I agree with everything you said 100000 percent. It's the truth. At least in my eyes. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy