Jump to content

All My Children questionaire (please help my thesis)


EricMontreal22

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Hey!  I can't offer money, but it would help me for my thesis paper if you answer any of these questions:

When did you start watching AMC, and was there a reason why you did (boredom, family member watched, illness)?

Do you remember when you became aware of who was writing it, and may be a writer change over?

(Long answer) Do you think about the show differently than you do other soap operas?  If so, or not, why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

AMC was my mom's favorite soap. When she came from work i would watch with her. I started watching AMC in the summer of 88. When i was 13 yrs. By this point i was already hooked on GH & OLTL. We would watch the entire ABC soap line up. Even Loving which i was never too into. 

I became aware of who the HW's were through Soap Opera Digest. My mom didn't pay mind too things like that. 

I liked it's diversity/ humor/ sense of community.  I hope this helps with your thesis.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I started watching AMC, because my mother watched AMC (and several other soaps).  However, my earliest memories associated with watching go back to when Jesse and Jenny were hiding out in NYC.  (Ironically, I remained a loyal viewer of the show long after my mother had given it up.)

 

I think the first time I was aware of who was writing AMC was when I was in the sixth grade.  At the time, I was doing a school paper on Irna Phillips (true story) and learning all I could not just about the history of Irna's shows (ATWT, AW, GL, etc.) but about others' as well.  Also, I was beginning to buy and read SOD and SOW on a regular basis; and in one "Grading the Soaps"-type article, I remember the writer expressing how much AMC had improved since Agnes Nixon returned and replaced Margaret DePriest as HW.

 

Do I think about AMC differently than I do other soaps?  Yes.  I think about AMC differently, because of Erica Kane.  No other character, save for GL's Nola Reardon and Scarlett O'Hara, has captured my imagination or heart the way "La Kane" has, or felt more like a mirror image of myself.  In Erica's constant need for validation (borne out of feeling abandoned by her father at an young, impressionable age) and her drive to be not just rich and famous but the desire of all men (and envy of all other women) everywhere, I see so many of own qualities (some flattering, others not).

 

I think about how Nixon herself described Pine Valley in her original bible for the show.  Whether one is born and raised there, moves there later in life, or just passes through on their way to other places, Pine Valley, she says, will always be home.  I feel the same way about Pine Valley, and about AMC, as a viewer.  Years after watching the show for the last time, just thinking about "the Valley" still conjures up feelings of being home, surrounded by gorgeous locales and diverse, larger-than-life characters who are warm, and funny, and totally unforgettable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I first started watching All My Children the summer of 1991 when I opted to not go to summer camp and I was bored at home.  I also had just gotten a tv of my own (my grandparents gave me one when I finished 5th grade that year).. and it was the start of the Janet from Another Planet story along with the Hayley/Brian teen romance that kept me around.. plus, I finally got to see the infamous Erica Kane (that my mom had told me about).

 

I wasn't aware of who the writer was at the time.. I just remembered how quirky I found Janet Green.. and liked her friendship with Hayley.. while wondering what both Natalie and Janet saw in Trevor LOL.  I also found myself liking Mimi and Derek (and they were portrayed as smart cops as well).  I also recall Will Cortlandt being obsessed with Dixie dating Craig and thinking Will seemed off balance (little did I know how true that became months later LOL).

 

What drew me to the soap was because it happened to be on and I had my own tv to watch it on (my mom was a CBS soap girl and she taped Santa Barbara and Days of our Lives to watch on the weekends).. so I wanted to see what the ABC soaps were like.. and fell in love with the quirkiness of All my children.  I think during that period Erica was in a more mellow period and wasn't front burner.. but 1992 was when I finally got to see what Erica Kane was all about (especially when paired with Dimitri Marick).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When did you start watching AMC, and was there a reason why you did (boredom, family member watched, illness)?

 

The earliest storyline I remember watching was the crossover baby switch with OLTL, which I had already been watching.

Do you remember when you became aware of who was writing it, and may be a writer change over?

 

By the time AMC was part of my soap line up, I was already a part of message boards so was aware of Head Writers and things.

(Long answer) Do you think about the show differently than you do other soap operas?  If so, or not, why?

 

I've never considered AMC one of 'my' soaps because I never watched it for an extended period of time uninterrupted. Because I never was a viewer during any particularly great period I never felt the connection to it that I do something like DAYS, where I had watched since I was a small child. This isn't to say I don't treasure it's place in soap history, or that I haven't found myself interested in learning about and/or watching clips from the past. Of the Agnes soaps, I've found that OLTL better suited my tastes overall and I consider it my second soap that I moved on when I couldn't stomach DAYS any longer (for however long that period lasted for)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I began watching in the summer of 2003, Jackson is Greenlee's father was the big storyline at the time. Michael Cambias was also front burner. 

 

I was actually a fan of Passions at the time (hey, don't judge!) and I began watching AMC waiting for Passions to begin. DOOL was boring at the time with, IIRC was the goop SL. 

 

Oddly, I was really drawn by AMC's opening credits. I'm a sucker for dramatic opening credits with good music. I knew who the HW was by reading the credits when the show began, but in 2004 I joined Soap Opera Central's message boards and gradually began to learn more and more about soap's behind the scenes. 

 

My all time favorite soap is As The World Turns, I loved it and miss it. AMC differed than ATWT in that it felt so soapy and dramatic, primarily because of Erica Kane. Susan Lucci has just the right dab of soap opera ridiculousness. I also really liked Kendall and the Chandler family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

- I began watching AMC in June of 2001. The very first factor that drew me to it was Jesse McCartney as JR Chandler. I was eleven years old, and I'd fallen deeply in love with him and his portrayal of the wounded little rich boy who needed love and attention from parents who were too wrapped up in their own drama to care about him.

 

- I became aware of who was writing the show when Richard Culliton was let go in late 2002 in favor of Gordon Rayfield (later to be joined by Anna Theresa Cascio).

 

- AMC is my "home" soap. For many years, soaps were just the "stories" that my grandparents and other older relatives watched. I'd always been familiar with the CBS soaps, but when I started watching AMC, I felt so grown up because it was "my" show. Not my grandma's, not my uncle's, not my dad's, etc. So, the characters and their histories were all new to me. I spent hours reading about the past storylines and actually retyping summaries just so that I could commit the stories to my memory. Between my daily viewing via VCR tape and my constant delving into the past, the show became a huge part of my adolescence. No matter how much I've gotten into other shows (and I do LOVE my ATWT!), coming back to AMC and its characters, its settings, its lore, etc. always feels like coming back home. The tight-knit families, the high-key humor, the tongue-in-cheek elegance, the fact that it knew how to not take itself so seriously from time to time, its grandness...all of these are the things I expect when I want to go back to Pine Valley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I started watching around fall 1995. I had grown up watching CBS soaps, and had become alienated by them enough to consider giving other networks a chance. I started reading soap magazines around this time and was interested in what they were saying about AMC - namely, Erica's pill addiction story. I had also started watching Loving, and AMC came on right after. Once I got into the show I also got to see the homophobia storyline, which I thought was extremely brave, and I still think was brave, all these years later. It was the first story of that kind I'd ever seen on a soap (I'd never seen the Hank Elliot story on ATWT). 

 

I knew who was writing the show not long after I started, as the soap magazines at the time, especially SPW, covered McTavish being replaced by Broderick.

 

I do think of AMC differently than I do other soaps, for a number of reasons. 

 

For one, because I never really got to see the best years of the show. By the time I started, it was in the stages of trying and trying to figure out what people wanted it to be, and what ABC (soon Disney) demanded it be. 

 

Another reason is because I think AMC was very much a hybrid soap, in a very unique way, from very early on. From the start you had social issues, class issues, very broad comic relief, and young love. It was something that no other soap could ever manage to pull off, even if they'd tried. And it's something AMC itself often struggled to pull off, but when they did, like in the early '80s, or for a brief period in the late '80s, bits and pieces of the mid-90s and the early '00s, etc. it was damn good. 

 

The show is also very unique in that it was revived online, of course. I'm sorry we'll never know what might have been. 

 

Beyond the above, the other reason is that AMC, to the end, had a creator who genuinely loved the show, loved the characters, and tried to keep the show to what she felt in her heart as much as she could. Did she always succeed? Of course not. We could go on about that, as many have over the years, but she tried. And seeing Agnes appear even in those last years, still clearly delighted and moved to be so close to her baby, was very touching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks everyone.  I think you're right Carl--even at its headshaking worse Agnes Nixon was a consultant (except for the nearly two years Pratt had her kicked out) and she had, for better or worse, last say. 

In the Soap Opera Encyclopedia (one of the first soap press places where AMC is praised--throughout the 70 it is talked about like it was insulting to soaps.):

Probably television’s most consistently entertaining and intelligent serial [despite] a blend of styles that may, for some, be emotionally unsatisfying.  In a single episode there are elements of Sixty Minutes, Love Story, and The Carol Burnett Show—social realism side by side with sophisticated drawing room farce.  No tone is sustained for an entire episode.  But life is often just as messy as this show, and the individual segments are engaging, the actors likable the writing witty, the emphasis on family laudable, and the presentation of social issues outstanding.  AMC has also been blessed by that precious soap opera commodity, continuity, both in its cast and in its writing, having only two headwriters in its history [up to this point], Agnes Nixon and Wisner Washam.[1]


[1] Wisner Washam joined Nixon’s writing team in 1972, where he was promoted to the associate headwriter position by the end of the 1970s and stayed, with a brief hiatus, until 1992.  Nixon remained the executive headwriter at AMC until her retirement in 2001, and then became executive story consultant for the show until its cancelation in 2011 (with only a 20 month period beginning in 2008 when ABC, due to creative disagreements and despite much fan outrage, had her removed from production completely).  However, from 1981 until her retirement there were extended periods when Washam, or another associate, Lorraine Broderick, as well as others were given the official headwriter position credit—notably when Nixon would focus on her ratings-challenged third soap opera, Loving (1983-95).  For the sake of simplicity I treat the entire era from 1970 until 2001 as being Nixon’s work, because despite the entire soap writing team having story input—soap opera is a collaborative form, after all, from the creatives to the advertising and network execs—she was still the one who set the tone for the show, dictated the majority of story, and had final say on all creative decisions.

Please ignore my notes

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

1993. I had a preteen crush on Sarah Michelle Gellar after reading about her and AMC in a magazine. (This did not pan out, as even then I was screamingly gay)

 

 

I wasn't aware of those sorts of issues until at least 1998-1999, when I began to seek out soap opera forums on the Internet/USENET.
 


It always struck me as a very homey, comfortable show. When I began watching all the ABC soaps, One Life to Live was and remained my favorite, as it was gritty and dealt with social issues and raw, difficult characters; I related to that as a grunge-era tween. It felt more adult, while I frankly initially found AMC too sweet and sappy. I thought everything with Harold the dog and Janet, etc. a year later(?) was cartoonish and too childish at the time, even though the Janet plot had me hooked. Claire Labine's GH was also homey, but more serious - AMC felt like the most stereotypically 'soap opera' show, with campy plots, very broad humor, overly lavish mansions and arch characters who were counts and princesses, etc. Only Days of our Lives had had that for me at that time, and that was a very different show than the ABC ones of the period - pure comic book.

 

I didn't appreciate AMC's unique mix - which Carl perfectly describes - for what it was by comparison until a year or two in, but I loved a number of characters (Erica, Dimitri, etc.) from the start. As an adult I understand its mix of tones and its homespun charm as well as its timeless soap opera classicism much better. It's one of a kind, and that's one major reason I grew to understand AMC and OLTL as the perfect tonal compliments to each other back to back on the TV schedule very quickly as a kid - light and dark. You had big humor with Opal or wacky stuff with Harold the dog or Janet/Jane the campy villain, but you also had real drama like Edmund and Maria and their endless trials (I loved them as a kid), Kelsey and her pregnancy, later Noah and Julia, etc.

 

This may not be factual, but the way I remember it, they premiered the 'white' opening or whatever it was over the Christmas holidays somewhere in 1994-1996 - I don't recall when - but I remember just being wowed by that. It was like watching the seasons change to winter in the town itself that I followed as many days as I could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When did you start watching AMC, and was there a reason why you did (boredom, family member watched, illness)?

Growing up, my paternal grandmother watched the CBS soaps and my maternal grandmother watched the ABC soaps. For a brief time after high school, I lived with my maternal grandmother, who fixed "dinner" during what we call lunch (which differs from "supper," for all of you that didn't know.

Please register in order to view this content

 ) I usually ate dinner while AMC was on in the next room, and I became intrigued by the humorous character of Opal Purdy Gardner as she was trying to "land" Palmer Cortlandt. At first, I only watched these scenes, but then I became interested in other scenes as well. This would have been in the fall of 1990. 

Do you remember when you became aware of who was writing it, and may be a writer change over?

Being interested in show business, I always paid attention to credits. I'm the guy in the theater who didn't leave until the end, even before Marvel superhero "stings" after the credits rolled. I really started to become interested in the changeovers when the show went from Megan McTavish to Lorraine Broderick in the mid-90s. 

(Long answer) Do you think about the show differently than you do other soap operas?  If so, or not, why?

I always think differently of AMC, because it is the only soap I actually watched fully. I stayed tangentially connected to other soaps due to family members and for a brief time, subscribed to Episodes and SOD. Since AMC has been gone, it's just not the same. I come here to these boards mostly for the nostalgia and I enjoy the general entertainment and political threads. I never added another soap to my lineup, because daily viewing, even on VCR, was sometimes difficult to keep up with while working full time. I really think AMC and OLTL 2.0 really had it right in their rebirths as a show that only aired 2-3 times a week as a "half hour" (although initially that p***ed me off). One thing I always appreciated about AMC was its "realism," which unfortunately flew out the window more and more often, esp. as Chuck Pratt took over. By then, I guess I was so invested, I saw it through with eyes permanently rolled. I can laugh through Opal's tarot readings and Myrtle dating Santa Claus, but never could stomach Jeremy's psychic powers and Erica's unabortion (although I appreciated both actors, and thought the character had a horrible undeserving exit). And although Opal remained a favorite, the real drawing power for me through most of the run was David Canary's portrayals of Adam and Stuart Chandler. Even the most asinine story (who killed Stuart?) could be riveting due to his performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I sort of grew up with it always on. Not that I remember much from when I was a kid. LOL. My mom, aunt and grandma all watched the ABC soaps. I've always had affection towards the ABC soaps because of it. They felt like 'home' for a long time. Meanwhile, NBC was my "guilty pleasure" (around 1997 I was young and soaps like Sunset Beach and later Passions were actually appealing to someone younger). DAYS has always been my #1, but OLTL and AMC hold a very special place. I love GH too but not in the same way. GL also always had a special place for me.

 

I know this isn't about all the soaps LOL but just felt like throwing it all out there. I can't recall anything specifically about AMC that made me a fan or watching since it was always background noise growing up. I think certain soaps just appeal more to you, even if you may "like" them all.

 

We had so many unique soaps. It sucks networks and executives spent some of their last decades on the air trying to make them more generic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I lived in a town that had only two stations - one being a CBS affiliate which showed some ABC and NBC programming, and the other being an affiliate of NBC which showed some ABC programming.

 

As far as ABC daytime programming, channel 12 (mainly CBS) showed General Hospital, Bewitched, and The Dating Game.  Otherwise, it showed the entire CBS line-up.

 

Channel 3 (NBC) showed Dark Shadows, Let's Make a Deal (before it moved to ABC), Ben Casey, and The Lorretta Young Show. 

 

So, I never saw From These Roots, The Nurses, or  Never Too Young.  And, because the NBC continued to show Let's Make a Deal after the show moved from NBC to ABC, I never saw anything in that ran against it.   (Hidden Faces and Life with Linkletter are two of the shows that I remember not seeing.)

 

I saw my first episode of All My Children (along with The Best of Everything and A World Apart) in the summer of 1970s when I was on vacation in Biloxi, Mississippi.

 

(By the way, of the three, The Best of Everything was my favorite.)

 

The plot of All My Children that day was that Phil had just learned of his true parentage and was running away to New York.  Amy Tyler was crushed, and she was talking to a man (who I think was Nick Davis).

 

My viewing area gained a third local station (the ABC affiliate) in October 1971.   I saw my second episodes of A World Apart and All My Children, plus my first color episodes of General Hospital and Dark Shadows on a Friday holiday we get to attend the Mississippi State Fair.   (For some reason, I don't remember watching One Life to Live - probably due to my The Edge of Night addiction.,)

 

The episode of All My Children that I saw was about Mona's receipt of the news of Eric.   She kept talking to Dr. Tyler about how she would break the news to Erica and how Erica would react.

 

I then resumed watching A World Apart, Dark Shadows, and  All My Children during school holidays.   (A World Apart was by far my favorite.   I was crushed at the cancellation of Dark Shadows and then A World Apart.)

 

 

I was aware that the creator/writer of both One Life to Live and All My Children was Agnes Nixon.   I had never seen her Another World (being a dedicated fan of The Secret Storm), but I had read about the early One Life to Live in an issue of Afternoon TV.   Additionally, I saw Ms. Nixon when she was a guest star on The Mike Douglas Show.  (I remember that Marty Rossi was that week's co-host.)

 

 

In my mind, I did not think of All My Children as different from other soap operas.  I knew that important social issues were presented, and I realized that there was more comedy on it that the other shows I had seen with my mother.   However, I credit Agnes Nixon with creating two very important comedic characters that I had seen on Search for Tomorrow (the show whose initial headwriter was Ms. Nixon before her marriage.)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

1. I started watching in 1970 when the show premiered, based on my appreciation of Nixon's writing, having loved her material on TGL, AW, and OLTL. Plus, I wanted to see Rosemary Prinz again, whom I had adored as Penny on ATWT.

 

2. I have always been acutely aware of who is writing the soaps. I follow my favorite scribes around the dial.

 

3. I like the fact that when it began, AMC was a hybrid of traditional soap storytelling and themes, mixed with topical material and even wry humor. Pine Valley always had a real sense of community during its first decade, which made it feel cozy and like a second home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Download isn't working for me either.  With that said, thank you for all the work you have done!
    • @P.J. Well, it wasn't her first award. I am sure she has written books, and spoken at colleges, and gotten some notoriety from it. Most importantly, she is fulfilled. Something Dani is not.  @Paul Raven Exactly, it does not ring true to me. Dani has that big personality because she is masking pain. And she probably clung to Bill because he made her feel smart and important (at one point). There are ways to add more layers to her.
    • Absolutely. And IIRC Rose Alaio has mentioned production having it out for her.
    • That goes back to Chance/Abby-there was way more to explore with their marriage but the first problem that pops up that's pretty much it-moving on. And Kyle/Lola, years worth of story dropped so he can fall back in love with Summer. Sharon/Rey married off with no plans for their future so they kill him off. And so on...
    • All of that would be interesting. Why would JG ever do that?
    • GH 1976 Pt 2 Medical student Bobby Chandler’s bone-marrow test results are in, and Steve Hardy has the difficult task of telling him he has Malenkov’s Disease, a rare and fatal blood disease. Bobby, newly married Samantha, hears his one-year-maximum prognosis and insists that Steve not tell anyone, as he has to have time to work out his own feelings. To cover up the treatments he’ll be starting immediately, Bobby, with Steve, decides to tell his family he has mononucleosis. His wife and his mother, Caroline, accept this story, but attorney Lee Baldwin senses it’s much more and presses Bobby for the truth, then promising to keep Bobby’s secret. Even though Bobby moves into a state of remission, Lee realizes the gravity of the problem and moves his wedding to Caroline forward, assuring Bobby that he will always be there for both Caroline and Sammi. But Bobby’s remission is short-lived, and his symptoms are now more severe, requiring frequent whole-blood transfusions. And a new experimental drug he is taking holds the threat of serious side effects. Sammi learns that Bobby’s attempt to buy life insurance was turned down and, herself a nurse, realizes that his symptoms are more severe than mono. She tries to press Leslie for the truth, but Leslie can’t violate a patient’s confidence. She does, however, pressure Bobby to let Sammi share is with him. Bobby insists that he can’t; he won’t send her into mourning while he’s still there to watch. But Sammi, angry at being treated like a child, presses the issue and manages to find out the truth. She then asks Lee to convince Bobby that his mother must be told so they can all show him the love they have for him before it’s too late and they have only  regrets for what went unsaid. Lee agrees, and after the wedding he protectively tells Caroline the truth. Sammi then tells Bobby that she is pregnant, news that he receives with very mixed emotions. Steve hits an optimistic note when he tells Bobby that a new breakthrough in leukemia chemotherapy may help him in his fight for life. This new treatment calls for more extensive testing, and Steve is overjoyed to find that there has been a variation in Bobby’s condition which indicates that he -doesn’t have Malenkov’s Disease after all. His condition, while serious, can be successfully treated  extensive drug therapy in New York, and Lee quickly arranges for all of them to move there so they can support Bobby during the extensive treatment and long recovery.  Dr. Jim Hobart and his wife, Audrey, are continuing their therapy sessions, trying to decide if they have a future together. Audrey admits she has stayed with Jim only because he needed her while he was drinking, and he in turn admits that he knows Audrey married him not out of love but out of gratitude for saving her son Tommy’s life in surgery. When Jim finally tells Audrey that he created his own alcoholic abyss and blamed her only because she was conveniently close, she wonders what will happen to: her when he recovers. If he doesn’t need her, can she go on? Does she need so much to be needed? When Jim, improving, starts teaching at the local college, he finds his self-image improving. But Audrey, worn out from therapy, suggests that she take a short vacation alone. Jim sees this as a way of undermining his recent strides and is angry. He relates this situation to his recent impotence, caused by his emotional problems. Jim reacts to his own feelings of inadequacy by withdrawing from Audrey, treating her impersonally and coldly. She takes this as an indication of her own failure. But when Jim reacts enthusiastically to one of his students, lovely young Sally Grimes, Audrey questions her own responsibility for the situation and accepts a dinner invitation with Steve Hardy, her first husband. Steve’s reassurance that she’s been a paragon of tolerance is negated when Jim walks in late and showing signs of drinking. When she asks how he could do it, he bitterly replies, “It’s a way to help me escape from you,” and turns and leaves. He goes to Sally’s, where they make love. When Sally later expresses regret at interfering in his marriage, Jim assures her there was nothing left to spoil—his wife is frigid but has blamed their sexual failure on him; thanks to Sally, he now knows he’s not inadequate. Since Sally won’t have an affair with a married man, Jim decides to make the break with Audrey. He bit- _ terly tells her Sally proved to him that he never had a problem—all he needed was a real woman, not one who was all burned out. He scathingly says that she takes men and castrates them; cases in point, her three husbands: Steve Hardy, Tom Baldwin, and himself. Shocked and horribly hurt by his accusations, Audrey swallows sleeping pills but immediately realizes the folly of her actions and tries to get help. Steve, meanwhile, senses something wrong and on a hunch goes to her apartment, where he finds her unconscious. He rushes her to the hospital for treatment, and after sixteen hours she begins to come around. She tearfully repeats Jim’s accusations while still groggy, and Steve reassures her that nothing Jim said was in any way true. As she dozes in the security of his presence, he whispers to her, “There’s a lot of woman in you, there was and there is, my sweet, lovely Audrey.”  Nurse Beth Maynard, despite her frequent pronouncements that she’s immune to emotional involvement, has fallen in love with resident Kyle Bradley. Beth’s sister, Nurse Diana Taylor, feels that Kyle treats Beth as if she were a casual conquest, however, rather than a woman he loves. Kyle’s life is now complicated by the arrival of Nurse Kate Marshall in town. She is staying with her godmother, Jessie Brewer, R.N., while. she recovers from a painful divorce. She and Kyle had an affair a few years ago, and she knows he’s married but keeps his wife “under wraps.” Kyle, in turn, knows that the discovery of Kate’s affair with Dr. John McAllister drove his wife to suicide. Kyle and Kate resume their affair. Despite the fact that Kyle is now living with Beth, Diana has seen enough to convince her that Kyle is deceiving her sister. But Beth won’t believe this, until she sees them embracing herself. When she confronts Kate, Kate bitterly tells Beth everything past and present about herself and Kyle, including the interesting fact that he’s married. Beth, shocked and hurt, throws Kyle out, and Jessie, who overheard Kate’s vindictive diatribe to Beth, arranges her transfer to another hospital.     
    • This is so true - the instant love is annoying. Adam/Sally/Billy/Chelsea are the best evidence of why this rings hollow. While I can see Adam/Chelsea reuniting based on a long history and Connor, there's no way Sally would instantly declare love. While Billy is just a desperate soul, Sally would be far more cautious after what happened with Adam. The *real* Sally would not only scheme to get Adam back, but make Chelsea's life difficult. She just got over it and gave up. Please. Instead of insta-love why can't some of these characters more casual? I hope Claire flings with Holden after Kyle falls into Audra's trap. Abby turns to Nate when Devon obsesses over Amanda - even if she's not in town. Lauren turns to Jack during this Michael stress, who in turn lands in Diane's web. We need messy triangles/quads and more.
    • Literally looks like a damn VFA or bingo hall. But we’re supposed to believe high rollers go there.
    • More 1976 LOL Carrie is very afraid that Ian’s paying her bills will force Arlene into a relationship with him she doesn’t want. She asks Joe if there’s some way to give Ian  back the money. Joe tells Arlene that her mother’s afraid of the situation, but Arlene assures him that the only thing she fears is that Tom will find out and think she’s more than a friend to Ian. Betsy, understandably resentful of Arlene, can’t see what her brother sees in her and is upset to see Arlene with Ian, as she’s sure Tom will be hurt. Tom is initially quite angry when he happens to learn that Ian paid Carrie’s hospital bills in full but believes Arlene when she assures him Ian’s just a friend. Ian, meanwhile, after Arlene admits she has strong feelings for a young doctor and can therefore regard Ian only as a friend, puts the pieces together and makes an appointment to see Tom for a cardiac examination. Tom realizes why Ian has chosen him and refuses a considerable fee to become Ian’s personal physician. . Betsy has suggested that Tom not ask Arlene to Meg’s formal New Year’s Eve party for the sake of all concerned. Meg, while having Carrie alter her party dress, mentions she’s being escorted by a wealthy man but doesn’t mention Ian by name. Ian had asked  Arlene to fly to Mexico with him for the New Year, but she declined, explaining she had another date. Tom, seeing how left out she feels, tells Arlene they are going to Meg’s party after all, and she begins looking for a dress, unable to afford the type of smashing creation she really wants. Ian, learning that Arlene’s  looking for a dress suitable for Meg’s party, arranges to have a designer creation sent in place of the off the rack dress she selected. When it arrives, Arlene and Carrie immediately plan to return it, but, on second thought, Arlene decides it wouldn’t hurt if she wore it just this once.  Ben Harper is released from prison, and Betsy tries - to show him they have nothing left between them by dating Jamie. However, her feelings for Ben get in the way of her enjoying Jamie’s company. Jamie has decided to accept an out-of-town law firm’s offer and, before leaving, helps Diana arrange the passport requirements for her newly arranged missionary trainee post in Peru. Diana tells Jamie she’s finally found peace except for her sadness at having to leave Johnny  behind. Beaver Ridge has continued to deteriorate since Rick left Meg in control, and Jamie warns Rick that since he owns fifty-one percent of the club, he’ll have to come up with fifty-one percent of the money needed to put the place back on its feet. Cal has mentioned to Rick that she would rather have a smaller, more informal home than his imposing house, and when she learns he’s put the house on the market she assumes he’s considering her desire for an easier home to run. Rick is determined that Cal not know the full extent of his financial problems. Since she wants it so badly, Rick promises Cal he’ll buy the mill house as their home, but he refuses adamantly to accept money from her trust fund toward the purchase, recalling the trouble resulting from the last time he borrowed  money from a woman—her mother, Meg.  Ian informs Ray that he'll get his cut of Beaver Ridge only when he, Ian, has the controlling interest.  When Rick can’t raise his share of the Beaver Ridge capital, he approaches Ray for help. Ray sends him to Ian, who refusés to make a loan, explaining it’s his firm policy, but suggests he pay one hundred thousand ~ dollars for two percent of Rick’s holdings in Beaver Ridge, thus transferring majority ownership to himself. Rick thinks it over and realizes he has no choice but to accept. He hates losing control of Beaver Ridge but  feels his first responsibility is Cal and he must protect her from his financial worries. Ben has moved in with Van and Bruce, explaining to Meg that he wants no help and no coddling, he has to make it on his own. He manages to find a job as a salesman in a sporting-goods shop, despite his parole. Betsy hires Carrie as Suzanne’s baby sitter in order to be absent when Ben visits his daughter. Ben finally tells Betsy he’d hoped there was still a chance for them despite everything but her dating Jamie and avoiding him seems to mean he was mistaken. Betsy admits she’s no longer seeing Jamie and agrees to be home when Ben visits. They then call a truce and decide to attend Meg’s party together.  
    • A few years after my grandfather and great aunt passed away, my grandmother married her widowed brother-in-law. You could have knocked us all over with a feather when they told us. My point is: it happens in RL, a lot more often than people think. In the Jack/Siobhan case, it would have been super messy, which is exactly what you want on a soap. Putting Siobhan with Joe forced them to write her as very naive and gullible, which seemed totally wrong for the character they initially introduced. I liked Rose, too, but that story also got derailed by the stupid mob stuff.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy