Jump to content

Y&R February 2018 Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 494
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

I don't understand it either.  Cane is infinitely more interesting with an edge, and you're absolutely right.  He still cheated, lied and took the kids college money.  How in the hell is all of that Hilary's fault?!?!  

 

What makes it worse is reading interviews with DG complaining about how horrible the last year was.  Newsflash, you whispering ass... YOU'RE AN ACTOR!  Suck it up, buttercup!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I don't care either.

 

Theonly way that would be interesting is if Engen were back as Adam (he and JM had great hate chem back in the day) and their sibling rivalry were alive and well.  And I'd still root for Adam.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I missed a lot of the Sully mess because I was watching maybe once every three to four months at that point while very rarely checking synopses. But I’m not invested at all. Why bother when both of the real birth parents are “dead”/aren’t on the canvas? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

It's really, really stupid. Next thing I suppose we'll have Cane whining that Juliet tied him down to be a bed and raped him with Hilary for some reason have full knowledge of it. It's even stranger that Goddard complained because he's more interesting as seedy town villain that whatever noble hero type [!@#$%^&*] he wants to play. I can't even Khalil has been saddled up with him for a decade now. Khalil has chemistry with all the men except for Goddard. 

 

For whatever reason I don't think they actually anticipated the fact that Hartley would actually leave. So when he did, they had no back-up plans and that's why the story has been stretched out  since 2015 now. That or the story just stunk like hell to high heaven in the first place, and thanks to lazy mediocre writing and poor plotting it's become something of a boondoggle to the show, and now that Chelsea's leaving the show can give it a resolution for now. It's kind of like Abby's paternity story in the early '00's except far, far, far less interesting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wished Chelsea didn't change her mind and took Christian with her. I guess now Sharon, Phyllis, and whoever knows about Christian's paternity will still keep it a secret. Sharon should be the mother figure to Christian anyway because she's raised him for most of his life instead of his mother figure being the current piece of ass that Nick is sleeping with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I got confused with the two....so Christian is the son Adam had with whatshername.....and Connor is Chelsea and Adam's son? I was hoping everything would have come out but looks like the secret will stay buried....yawn.....Nick again looked like a damn fool.

I hated the flashbacks and thought they weren't necessary considering Chelsea and Nick weren't this great super couple no matter how much the writers wanted us to believe.

And Chelsea stealing the money which led to her exist made zero sense. Just dumb!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 

I highly disagree.  Sharon should NOT be raising him at all. I happen to think what she did was cruel. She knew he wasn't hers and kept him away from his mother and Mariah assisted. 

 

She has no rights to the child. I happen to like Sage and the Actress who played her. I think it was very unfair that Sharon and Mariah didnt pay for it. Not to mention the child was not hers. Any excuse she fed Dylan was horrible and I am not going to approve nor would most for her to get her hands on Christian. 

 

It was a cold thing to do and not to mention she had it happen with her when Adam did it with Faith and would she have wanted another person to raise her daughter that kept her away purposely??? NO she made sure she took Faith away from Ashley and also told her it was best Faith didnt see her also. 

 

Sharon should have served time for that and not to mention time for arson as well since we are on the subject. After that I will be outraged if she gets her hands on Christian. Sharon needs to do something else and keep away from Christian. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

+1 on not thinking it's right that Sharon ends up raising Christian. She was complicit in kidnapping that baby anyway you slice it. She shouldn't be rewarded with raising him. 

 

But I disagree on jail time. It's a soap. No one goes to jail unless they want to tell a jailhouse story. Lol

 

Plus, wasn't is like $250K. That's nothing to live on. Especially when she's giving up a supposedly successful designing career. Just dumb.

 

However, I do think they've set up very well the bitter Connor versus lap of luxury Christian brother fued for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Okay, I continue to maintain that what is so good about this particular reveal followed by umbrella storyline is that you can see & understand many different points of view where there is not one bad guy or one 100% right person.  About your stated opinion, that Lois & Gloria did the right thing, you know that this was technically an illegal adoption? For it to have been legal the father, if known, would have to have been informed & have signed off on terminating his own paternal rights. And, of course, it is clear how many people they lied to.  Personally I feel like Lois is going to take the biggest "public" blame with Lulu a close second in the blame category. I am looking forward to a tongue lashing I hope Brook Lynn gives to Gloria. I continue to be more than annoyed with Dante. First his attitude toward Gio with regards to Rocco & a drinking game & its results. Second his attitude toward Lulu. Meanwhile enjoying the show every day!
    • Lois and Gloria did the right thing I feel knowing it was Camila that raised Gio has BL feeling some jealousy No one is saying that Camila was a bad mother to Gio I believe it will be Gio saying that Camila was great to him, thanking Lois and Gloria to get BL to see truth
    • Its realistic for Dani and  true of how the character thinks and operates. We've known her long enough to by that this would be consistent with her past characterizatioin
    • Random takes: - What was even the point of that jeweler guy? Also—Dani was borderline harassing him. - I know I’m probably in the minority here, but I want Jacob and Kat to happen. I need something messy to completely dismantle the Duprees—and Katomas just isn’t cutting it.  - I officially can’t stand Jacob and his wife. Same goes for Anita and Vernon. - Hayley’s corset was just as ugly as it looked uncomfortable. - I genuinely don’t remember when or how Derek and Ashley reconciled—and I’m someone who didn’t even mind their storyline! LMAO. - Tuesday’s episode was a mess. - Dani finding out about Hayley’s pregnancy and immediately thinking, “She’s faking it”—huh?! What writer thought that was a realistic reaction? I get denial, but that leap was absurd. I agree the ‘Leslie Victorious’ moment was way OTT. But hey, at least I wasn’t yawning. The following episode, where she handed over her daughter’s last few belongings was much better. - I can’t with the constant back-and-forth between Orphey Gene’s and the Country Club. I forgot this was such a soap trope, but even back in my loyal viewer days (late ‘90s, early 2000s), it wasn’t this bad. While GH has a ton of beautiful sets, we’re stuck with the same three—and half of them are ugly. Also: it’s been way too long since we had a party, gala, or any kind of event. I know the Richardsons’ anniversary gala (back in late April) has had a big ripple effect, but I was kinda getting used to those large-scale episodes. Fingers crossed they don’t go with Guza.  
    • The horrific comments execs and writers make when they justify rape storylines or keeping rapists as love interests is just so icky. I remember Ron Carlivati's comments about the reraping of Marty storyline on OLTL. Made my skin crawl.  No matter what you think of her, Susan Lucci could have demanded front burner storylines but she never did. She was happy to be part of an ensemble. I never got that vibe from Zimmer.  For me, Reva was just not a character I cared that much about after a certain point no matter how talented Zimmer is/was. I think Zimmer had a keener eye for what made a good storyline, but she was less willing to take a backseat if it meant someone else got to shine. I'm trying to recall if she ever mentions Michelle Forbes in her book--one of the few times the viewers did not care about Reva in a storyline. My sense is if she did, it was probably some backhanded remark about how she had to show Forbes the ropes.    
    • GH was good? I havent watched since Joss went away to do her traininig and Lulu had just called Brooklyn out for having Dante's baby and not telling him
    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy