Jump to content

Y&R: February 2017 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I know a lot of people can't abide by Faith but I thought the scenes between Faith and Sharon were really very good. I thought all of Sharon's scenes- with Chelsea and with Nick were well executed. This is the type of stuff that SS does very well. Now if she could only get the macro (big picture) storylines down pat.

 

Still hoping somehow that Gloria's storyline arc will be shortened somehow. It serves no purpose for her to be onscreen every episode. The Fenmore's storyline is stalling out.

 

Strangely enough, the only story that appears to have any movement to it, IMO is Devon and Hillary's 'Will They or Won't They' get divorced saga. I think because SS's 'micro'/little moments writing style truly suits intimate storylines like this one, where stages of a relationship are on display and you don't really need big plot points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 793
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It's nowhere similar to WJB. No wonder Sally Sussman's bible was turned down the first time she applied for the HW job. It was probably full of Gloria and boredom. This woman wrote under William J  Bell and didn't learn a damn thing!  And the only one asking for Pratt back is that idiot Johnny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I disagree that she didn't learn anything, but I do think you have valid criticisms. The show is vastly improved, but I don't think she's at the level of Kay Alden, Jack Smith or Bill Bell yet. Of course it's still early so things can change. I think it's similar to Generations in that she creates compelling characters, but can sometimes struggle with the stories. I still can't understand the dynasty that her black family had being an ice cream shop lol. 

 

For me the good far outweighs the bad and again it's still early and I'm enjoying the show day-to-day so it's fine for me. I want to see where the show is at in a few more months. She still hasn't had much of a chance to introduce new characters and that will have a big part on how the stories fall in the future. So far we've gotten Ravi and Reed and I think they're having a positive impact on the show and were both smart choices to bring on. I'm curious to see what else she has planned in terms of new characters and how they'll impact the canvas. My biggest complaint is the same as many--too much Gloria, but my complaints mostly lie in Judith Chapman's acting. If Joan Van Ark were playing the role (or any capable actress) I highly doubt anybody would be complaining about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The show has no real story going on right now. Her stories are like an incomplete sentence....just full of fragments. Lauren's story rushed by so fast and went from her to automatically about Gloria and now her silliness with Jack.

 

The story with Reed isn't working because of Amelia Heinle in the role. She totally ruins it for me. The actor playing Reed is a much better actor than she is. She is just horrible.

 

I didn't care for Dyan so Sharon being grilled by Chelsea today was so boring to watch. And Chelsea is not needed anymore with Adam no longer there.

 

What else was on today? Oh I feel asleep cause I was so bored by the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I couldn't understand that either, lol.

 

When it comes to Sally Sussman's work (on GENERATIONS, on DAYS, on Y&R), one thing is clear: she can create characters who are fun to watch, but unless there's an element of wackiness to her stories (poisoned necklaces, Eileen Davidson playing multiple roles, Aunt Mary on GENERATIONS and her moose-head stuffed with diamonds), her writing flounders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

What it is, I think, is a show faced with a dilemma, which is repair a canvas filled with characters who are either past their expiration date or beyond salvaging after a decade or so of damage.  

 

I think Y&R is where it was before Bill Bell was forced out of necessity to transition the show away from the Brookses and Fosters and toward the Abbotts, Newmans and Williamses.  IMO, the show needs a serious transfusion of characters and families who haven't been tarnished or neglected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The cast needed a big overhaul. Some recasts and others fired. There didn't need to be some big event to do that just some good writing which Sally Sussman doesn't seem able to do.

 

The characters that are getting the most airtime by her ....I don't care about and they were on way too much under the other writing teams.  Add the hot mess that is Gloria and you've got one awful soap.

 

 

And where is Traci?? Why are we stuck with Gloria????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Kelli Giddish (Di Henry, AMC) has been reinstated as a regular in her popular role on Law & Order: SVU after a few seasons off.
    • I really like Paul Telfer a lot.   But I loathe Xander!
    • OK. No harm done. Agree to disagree... (Even thought I'm not sure about what...

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) Anyways... I did really feel disgusted by Eurovision this year and I doubt I'll watch this horrific musical torture in the future. My ears and my psyche will not survive.  
    • Regarding the mobster storyline: The scripts, the cardroom set, and the writing for Joey -- are all terrible. They seem to be writing a realistic depiction of compulsive gambling as an addiction, showing that it pops into his head all the time -- it has become hardwired into his brain.  The APA (American Psychological Association) describes compulsive gambling as having a similar effect on the physical brain as drug and alcohol addiction. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/07/how-gambling-affects-the-brain I think Jason Graham (Doug) is doing an adequate job playing Doug as a compulsive gambler, with the thoughts/urges coming into his head all the time, and being unable to stop. However, the cardroom set is awful and the mobster storyline is a bad cliché, so it's all so uninteresting to watch. I think Mr. Graham is doing the best he can with the crap they gave him to work with. If anyone reading or watching has a gambling issue, check out Gamblers Anonymous.  They have many types of meetings -- in-person, online, video, audio, etc.  They also have resources for friends/family of compulsive gamblers.
    • Today was painful (especially for Philip).  I still feel for Xander. He was clear he was happy sharing and working with Philip. It's just one more betrayal from someone he loved. Going back to last year when he found out about Victor and Fiona, then Alex and Philip. He forgave and tried. Then Philip went behind his back again. He's been walking on the edge for weeks. This is a man who was abused, neglected and has never had any therapy for his horrific past. He has zero coping skills because he's never learned them. I hate this but I refuse to hate Xander
    • Lucy Coe wasn't even this big of a whore. 
    • Kate being the one that Alex called was a nice surprise. The cut to her looking all sheek made me instantly get excited for her to get back into business mode. And the Jack reference from when she first came to town (on-screen) was inserted naturally which is always welcome. When they were talking about how much sex sells, I almost got the impression they were sizing each other up in a May/December type of way.  All the Philip stuff was gruesome. I'm happy the show isn't shying away from Xander's ugliness. I love them both, and it just makes me intrigued for the aftermath for it all to be taken seriously. I cheered when Philip spat out at that Sarah knew the truth. I'm on tenterhooks for their eventual confrontation. I was surprised that Kate wasn't a little vicious towards Sarah for Xander's obvious behavior, but maybe that's still to come. How wonderfully entangled is it that both Philip and Shawn/Steve stopped each other from getting the drug. Both equally at fault. Who/what will ultimately save Bo? And with everything going on, is a Salem where it's looking likely that EJ is about to own the hospital imminent?  
    • Oddly.. Chase and Steve seem to have both vanished from the canvas in December so the Estelle return loses impact when two of her kids stop appearing shortly after her return (and I assume TR leaves in early 1986 as well). The Steve recast doesn't work... but it's odd that he has a long scene with Teri with Cagney looking jealous.. when the majority of his time on the show previously was a relationship and engagement to Stephanie (who he barely has a scene with in the episodes I see). Your idea for Wendy/Bela/Stephanie sounds just like what Ryan's Hope did with Michael/Kim/Rae... and considering Louise Shaffer was playing Rae and Stephanie.. it would have been a lousy redux of a superior story on another soap (that had months of build-up) I think Quinn becoming assistant to Stephanie was Mayer/Braxton... but not 100 % sure. I don't know if Mayer/Braxton was setting up Sarah as a bad girl disguised as a good girl.. but the actress (Joyner) was playing the scenes in that manner.. and Tomlin wisely tapped into that when he took over.  
    • She’s such a caricature - which is a shame because I think the actress is capable of so much more.   I don’t know why Cady often feels like she has overcompensated in her performances. She already proved she can play much more than just Dixie Cooley during her first stint at ATWT (her best acting era). Her performances in various roles since then have been quite strange at times.
    • It feels like the show suddenly woke up today and remembered it was Sweeps month. Lots of action and forward momentum, including a delicious Nina/Carly fight. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy