Jump to content

Y&R: December 2016 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

I think it's as good a premise as any. I go by major department stores everyday in this city that still have upscale brick and mortar but their online is lacking. How they keep it together is beyond me. I've been waiting to see a story like this on Y&R, and I like that Jack is taking advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

Other than Victor and Nikki, Dru and Neil, Nick and Sharon, and MAYBE either Danny and Christine or Paul and Christine Y&R just has never done supercouples well at all ever. I know even Bell tried to force Brad and Traci there in 1991 but it was so bad he finally relented. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 No! Not one bit.

 

 I've been watching this show from the beginning and I've waited over 40 years for Jill be able to run Chancellor Industries. Even after Katherine died they gave it Victor. WTH! Jill wasn't even allowed to run her own home until now. So being white hasn't helped her even though she's had the decades of experience to do so. If Devon turns 65 and still isn't running his own company then I will understand the complaint.

 

Devon is not a Chancellor he's a Mccall/Winters. Jill was the one who married a Chancellor, the only one to bear Chancellor offspring, and the only character that had a relationship with Katherine for four decades. Katherine paid Devon out- more than all her other offspring combined, why would he be given Chancellor too?

 

 Devon is set to inherit McCall Unlimited, which is similar to Newman Enterprises and Chancellor Industries . But Devon running McCall (or Chancellor) would be as ridiculous as Genevieve buying and running Jabot. Inheriting $$$ to buy something doesn't make you instantly able to run it. Nick & Victoria have loads more business experience than Devon yet they don't run Newman, Victor does. Most of the young billionaire CEO's are self made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would consider those couples supercouples, in their own right, but Y&R definitely had the most number of characters that were either unattached or constantly bounced with different people.....I think Y&R had more popular pairings then anything, like Rex and Katherine, Jill and John, Jack and Nikki, Lauren and Scott or Lauren and Brad Ryan and Nina or Ryan and Victoria or Cole and Victoria ....but those were definitely not supercouples....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

And in more recent times people have tried to push Lame, Phick, and Villy so hard especially since the latter two were affairs not traditional romance lol.  As for Lauren and Scott when I look back on that pairing we had to see Lauren settle actually have to settle for fourth place after Paul, Brad and Jack and then have it blow up her face big time. I suppose that's how Bell planned Lauren's comeuppance? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Y&R has done supercouples. The difference between the way they do supercouples & other soaps is that members of one supercouple can be parts of other supercouples.


For instance Danny/Cricket & Paul/Cricket and Ryan/Victoria & Cole/Victoria were Y&R supercouples.

 

Then there were smaller pairings that were very popular like Danny/Patty, Brad/Traci, Brad/Lauren, Neil/Olivia, Malcolm/Olivia, Paul/Cassandra, Ryan/Nina, Victor/Diane, Lauren/Scott, Andy/Faren, Andy/Diane, etc.

 

Hell Victor is a supercouple three times over (Victor/Nikki, Victor/Ashley & Victor/Hope).

 

The problem began during Ed Scott's tenure when Y&R began throwing characters under the bus to prop Victor/Nikki & decided that Giggly Heffa was Jack's "soulmate"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

That could have worked. The problem with the Devon/Katherine relationship was that it never existed. They had a couple nice scenes, that was it. Not only that the Tucker/Katherine story didn't really make Tucker part of the family. Most of Tucker's time was spent with Ashley. Tucker was never part of, and he had no interest in, the Chancellor/Reynolds clan.

 

Meanwhile viewers have been watching the relationship between Kay & Jill for decades. We should have saw some big things happen for Jill, since their lives were connected for all these years.

 

 

It was the worst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nick HAS run Newman Enterprises. The problem was he ran it into the ground.

 

And Victor's sexism would never let him allow Victoria to run Newman despite the fact that she's always been his most business driven child.

 

It's the same sexism that means Jess Walton's Jill can't start HER OWN company & be a power player in her OWN right instead of sponging off the Chancellor name 40 years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The supercouple trend should have stayed in the 1980s as it really ceased to be relevant in the 90s.

 

Bill Bell may not have entirely bought into the idea of a supercouple but he sure as hell had them and promoted them for awhile. Maybe though, he ended his focus on them at the right time, which turned out to be a smart move in the long run. Most other soaps stayed too long in that era.

 

Had Terry Lester been around today, you bet your sweet bippy, he would've winked at Lauren or called her "Sugar" or intimated in some way the closeness of their friendship.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Yes, this thread is getting loads of participation over the past few days. Funny, that's what some half-way competent writing will do, we all are interested enough to comment now. Hopefully the writing will have some longevity as it has been less than a week since the regime change has popped up onscreen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

It has nothing to do with sexism. Jill has cared about everything Chancellor since Y&R started in 1973.  Phillip Chancellor II being her first love, her first marriage, the mansion, the Chancellor offspring, Katherine's life, and the company. Chancellor had as much to do with Jill life as Katherines. Jill is not sponging, she earned every bit of it as we watched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There was a time Y&R used to have daily threads. A few years later it was weekly threads.

 

Under the last couple of regimes it dwindled to monthly threads with barely any posts.

 

So you're right that this has been the most discussion Y&R has prompted in a long time.

 

Katherine willed the money to Devon. As one of Katherine's grandchildren Devon deserves it. Jill has her own money. The end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy