Jump to content

DAYS: November 2013 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 451
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Don't know what to make of this tweet, but CM stans are saying its homophobic and "Disgusting and truly humiliating to Freddie and Chandler. This is simply making a mockery of the LGBT community"

Guy Wilson @THEguywilson 1h

at Ralph's for midnight hollywood grocery shopping aka is she a chick or a tranny (?) and will he/she pleeeze stop touching all the grapes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some actors use glycerin. Other actors can just do that.

It's kind of funny to see that gif, because Jensen Ackles does that type of thing a lot.

KKL does too (not sure if she still does now - I rarely watch Brooke scenes since 2002 or so).

Or do you mean the tear just vanishes? That might be a lighting thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A lot of the time it's glycerin, or tear sticks. Some actors can just do it - I don't know how. (my father still asks if Brooke cries out of just one eye).

Please register in order to view this content

Unless it was scripted for him to cry I'd kind of guess Vaughan did it himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's not rape, as you so obviously expressed. It's some form of bargaining or at worst a kind of blackmail. Ultimately Sami gained something in their exchange and she complied to get something she wanted, hard to call that "rape" hard as the show might try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When I first heard Greg was going to DAYS, I fist-pumped and then thought "Oh, I hope they don't ask him to cry," (a reference to an infamous graveside scene on GH... bless his heart, he did his best, but... er... no).

Whether that was a real tear or was helped along by drops or glycerin, he totally sold it. Sure showed me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Under California law, rape is an act of sexual intercourse against the will of the victim that can occur under a variety of circumstances, including when:

  • the victim is prevented from resisting due to alcohol or drug intoxication.
  • the assailant uses physical force or the threat of force to over-power and control the victim.
  • the victim fears that she or he or another will be injured if the victim does not submit.
  • the victim is at the time unconscious of the nature of the act, and this is known to the assailant.
  • the victim is incapable of giving legal consent due to a mental disorder or developmental or physical disability, and this is known or reasonably should be known to the assailant.
  • the act is accomplished by threatening to use the authority of a public official to incarcerate, arrest, or deport the victim or another person.
  • the assailant uses duress, such as a direct or implied threat of hardship or retribution, to coerce the victim.
  • the assailant uses force, fear, or threats to accomplish sexual intercourse against the will of the spouse. (This provision of the law is known as the "spousal rape law.")

Source: http://www.scu.edu/wellness/topics/sexualassault/What-is-the-Ca-law-regarding-rape.cfm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thank you. You guys come to the rescue again. I'll take a look later.   Thank you for the info!!! Now I find myself less confused. You and @DRW50 are amazing.
    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy