Jump to content

OLTL Shelved


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Also, there are plenty of NON-online fans that are terribly confused with GH/OLTL already because of the actors playing diffrent characters. Because they don't go online they don't know the reason. The receptionist at my doctors office is an avid ABC soap fan and I had to explain everything to her. Recasting would have been even more detrimental because recasting 1 character is one thing but 3 at the same time is another. It worked for AMC because of the time jump and that the last this Colby is a much better actress. ABC should have just let them go IMO because there would be no way in hell to explain to non-online fans what the situation is even if they wanted to.

Also, Crossovers would have been good beacuse it would help insure the success of both shows. If both shows succeed ABC gets a lot of money if both shows fail they will not gain money. Not saying Crossovers are crucial but it will help insure the success. That said, I like crossovers between OLTL and AMC but GH characters just don't fit in the nixon shows and Nixon Show Characters don't fit it GH. The Nixon shows have a similar concept (Brotherhood of Man/Identifying your own Prejudice/The Coman Bond of humanity) that ran throughout the shows history where as GH had A LOT of diffrent focuses (First it was Medicine then Action/Adventure Then social Issues then the mobsters). Granted the Nixon shows drifted away from the concept but it could be reinforced easily unlike GH were every fan wants it there own way. Too me adding a complex nixon character on the GH canvus is like trying to compare "War and Peace" to "Twilight".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 430
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Crossovers and sharing characters should not be confused. Crossovers are doable and nothing to argue or sue about. Sharing characters means each and every story needs to be coordinated. Impossible!

Funny, how PP could not wait to get TnB back together, so yeah, that would have been a mess!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Had both GH and OLTL been on the same Coast and in an even better scenario, been in adjacent parts of the same studio or neighboring studios in the same city, etc.,I think it could've worked but even given all those 'what ifs', Daytime Soaps have always appeared to be notoriously resistant to cross-overs and doubling certain characters.

The travel complicates things but I think the biggest obstacle is the mindset that these shows embody. They are mostly slow to innovate. We all know this. So even something mutually beneficial to both shows, both shows' producers seem loathe to embrace the change.

Really a shame, a lot of cancelled daytime soaps went to their demise after being to slow to embrace changes (I'm looking at you, ATWT and GL, crossover potential!) and maximize the potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, right? Makes no sense. There were so many seamless possibilities that wouldn't have taken much in the way of writing but I guess these soaps were notoriously territorial and in the 1980s when these shows were flying high, I guess they didn't see the potential?

Oh, if I were old enough to have been a writer back then, it would've been so easy:

A medical convention involving Doctors, nurses and Administrators at Cedars and Oakdale Memorial. Or a health crisis (or natural disaster) affecting one of both towns where Oakdale/Springfield's finest convene to problem solve.

A hostile takeover bid by Spaulding Enterprises toward Walsh Industries, etc.

A crazy springbreak featuring the college aged youth of Springfield and Oakdale.

Missed opportunities, one and all. Too bad.

...but I digress...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the bottom line with the crossover dilemma is both soaps and creative teams wanted primary creative control over the OLTL characters in question. To which I say, personally - as much as I thought the transplants were largely successful in Port Charles - these characters are OLTL property, they're needed to help relaunch that show, so GH plays by OLTL rules with OLTL characters. Particularly since GH was only loaned them in the first place. It doesn't matter how emotionally attached Ron and Frank may be to OLTL. It doesn't matter that nobody (myself included) thought OLTL would really come back. All that matters is that it did come back and they were/are now beholden to that agreement. So play by their rules. The other sticking point with that, of course, is the fact that at least one or two of the OLTLers were foolishly signed to multi-year contracts at GH on the basis of that loan.

If I was in charge at OLTL I would've said you can have John and Starr full-time so long as we get them to do a short stint for the launch, and visits afterwards. That was already a huge concession to GH, but it would've been easy to do and would not have hurt OLTL much IMO (except for the fact that the OLTL HWs had apparently planned Natalie's entire first arc around the presence of John). And Todd will do double-duty, but we get him back for launch (much as they did in reality) and then he goes back and forth between the shows from hereonin. Todd had business interests in Port Charles, and he made a fantastic pot-stirrer and troublemaker in that town; he was a shot in the arm for GH last spring. But would I have reunited him with Blair, done that whole bit, yes. Because the fact is that the Todd character is money for OLTL, and so are these soaps' big couples, and the new show needed to have primary agency when it comes to their star characters, their couples - they cannot be beholden to GH's interests as though Frank and Ron are some sort of ludicrous OLTL creative team in exile (like Batista) while they're actually running an entirely different soap opera, anymore than OLTL could've been expected to have control of GH's Carly or Sam or Michael, or whoever else was connected to the OLTL characters. So Todd does both shows. And could you have kept playing on the tension with Todd and Carly as he went back and forth from then on, teasing him being torn between the women - sure, although I would've still kept moving her to A.J. Quartermaine, as they were doing around that time, because that pairing is Carly's destiny IMO.

A crossover setup was doable IMO, but not when there was, I suspect, a lot of pride, ego and chest-thumping on both sides. Nobody wanted to give anything up when it was easy enough for OLTL 2.0 to let at least Alderson and Easton mostly loose - they had apparently been willing to let them walk after brief runs at launch, then doubled back and changed their minds - and I suspect FV and RC refused to accept they couldn't have full creative control either. "We signed them to contracts!" Tough [!@#$%^&*], it was a loan. Make it work.

That being said, I find the Triskelion story on OLTL, slow though it was to get going, a lot more interesting than whatever polyglot of GH and OLTL Ron would have come up with for the Two Todds himself. Judging by the Cassadine/Faison/etc. arc developing on GH right now, it's not all that impressive when put into practice day by day. (Neither was the Irene reveal on OLTL, after the first few days.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hated the structure of the baby switch story on AMC and OLTL in 2003-2004, but I can't deny that from what I've heard, it did very good business. For AMC, at least. OLTL got fucked around with Kevin and Kelly; that thread ended on our show like a damp squib. That was the problem with it for me - while Malone's team played a lot of the drama on their show that summer, ultimately it petered out and in the endgame, OLTL was the afterthought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy